Supreme Court won’t hear Pennsylvania legislators' challenge to executive actions expanding voting access
The Supreme Court decided Monday that it won’t take up a case to restore a lawsuit by Pennsylvania Republicans that challenged executive actions expanding voting access on the basis that only state legislatures can regulate federal elections.
Twenty-seven state legislators filed the lawsuit to challenge a 2021 executive order by President Biden increasing access to voting through several measures and an edict by Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) to enact automatic voter registration statewide.
However, after a district court threw out the case, the state legislators asked the justices to bypass a federal appeals court and determine ahead of the 2024 presidential election whether they have standing to bring the challenge. The justices on Monday declined to do so.
The Republican legislators are hinging their request on the so-called “independent state legislatures theory,” which contends that authority for regulating federal elections is singularly vested in state legislatures.
Adherents to the theory point to the Constitution’s Election Clause – which states that state legislatures shall set the “times, places and manner” of holding elections for U.S. Senate and House members – as rationale.
The Pennsylvania state legislators also cite a second constitutional provision, the Electors Clause, which says that states, in a manner directed by their legislatures, appoint electors to certify federal elections.
But the Supreme Court already declined to endorse the theory in 2023, when the justices ruled 6-3 against a bid to give state legislatures sweeping authority in drawing congressional maps and regulating federal elections.
“The Elections Clause does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion in Moore v. Harper.
The Pennsylvania legislators argued that the high court still needed to determine “individual state legislator standing,” noting that 27 individual legislators banded together to “guard their duty to determine the manner of federal elections.”
Date: |
-
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won’t take up challenge to Jack Smith’s Trump Twitter data access
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge by social platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to court rulings that forced the platform to turn over data on former President Trump’s ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - NBC News
The threat of election chaos looms as the Supreme Court returns to action
The Supreme Court returns from its summer break on Monday with a new slate of cases to decide, but it is an issue not even on the docket yet that is the center of attention: the upcoming ...1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won’t weigh Michigan ban on state funding for private schools
The Supreme Court will not weigh whether Michigan’s ban on public dollars for private schools can stand, allowing a decades-old amendment to the state’s constitution to remain intact. Five ...2 hours ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won’t revive lawsuit over DOJ school board memo
The Supreme Court won’t revive a lawsuit from parents in Michigan and Virginia who sued Attorney General Merrick Garland after he directed federal authorities to address threats against school ...2 hours ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won't hear arguments in Texas emergency abortion case
The Supreme Court decided not to hear arguments in a case involving Texas that could have provided an answer about whether a state abortion ban conflicts with a federal emergency care law. The ...2 hours ago - Abortion -
Top stories - CBS News
Supreme Court won't hear dispute involving Jack Smith and Trump's X data
Special counsel Jack Smith obtained in January 2023 a court-authorized warrant for information associated with former President Donald Trump's X account as part of its election interference probe.2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Entertainment - ABC News
Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from singer R. Kelly, convicted of child sex crimes
The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the singer R. Kelly, who is now serving 20 years in prison after being convicted of child sex convictions in Chicago2 hours ago -
Top stories - ABC News
Supreme Court won't hear appeal from Elon Musk’s X platform over warrant in Trump case
Prosecutors got search warrant in the election-interference case against Trump.1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
Top stories - CBS News
Supreme Court convenes for new term, here's a look at some of the cases they're hearing
The U.S. Supreme Court is reconvening for its new session Monday. The court's docket includes cases dealing with the regulation of so-called ghost guns and the controversial concept of medical ...25 minutes ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Democrats accuse food, beverage companies of ‘profiteering’ through ‘shrinkflation’
Two Democratic lawmakers have sent a letter to some of the country’s biggest food and beverage companies arguing they are “profiteering” through “shrinkflation,” the practice of reducing product ...50 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
The imagined national debt crisis: A long-running distraction
Republicans in the House of Representatives threatened to shut down the government in September 2024 in order to reduce the national debt, but Democrats bailed them out, recognizing that closing ...58 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Trump says son Barron heard about assassination attempt on tennis court
Former President Trump said his youngest son, Barron, was playing tennis when he learned in July that his father had been shot at the Butler, Pa. rally. Trump recounted the experience in a sit-down ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Musk-founded PAC says it will give $47 for every swing-state voter referral who signs petition
The America PAC, founded by tech billionaire Elon Musk, is asking the public to sign a petition in favor of the First and Second Amendments and offering supporters $47 for each subsequent ...1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
US spending on Middle East conflict tops $22B since Oct. 7: Research
The United States government has spent more than $22 billion on fighting the conflict in the Middle East since war erupted a year ago on Oct. 7, 2023, according to new research. The Costs of War ...1 hour ago