There’s less social media transparency and, likely, more disinformation
In 2016, RAND Corporation researchers described Russia’s attempts at influencing the American public as a “firehose of falsehoods,” characterized by a high volume of content distributed broadly, repetitively and with little commitment to truth and consistency.
Our knowledge of these tactics was partly built on a degree of social media transparency that no longer exists in 2024.
The social media site X ceased offering free access to researchers in 2023, now charging them $42,000 a month for the access necessary for large-scale research. Reddit also ended free access for large-scale research in 2023.
Meta just replaced CrowdTangle, its platform allowing journalists and researchers to monitor trends on Facebook and Instagram, with a replacement that is reportedly less transparent and less accessible.
And then there’s TikTok, generally considered by researchers to be among the most opaque and difficult to work with of major social media platforms. TikTok has not necessarily grown worse in this regard, but its opaqueness has grown more consequential as its popularity has expanded.
These recent declines in transparency may blind researchers and the public to the effects of other changes in the social media ecosystem that are altering how disinformation is being spread. These include the continuing rise of influencer marketing, the growing capabilities of artificial intelligence and declining content moderation by social media platforms, itself a consequence of such moderation becoming politically fraught.
The increasingly controversial nature of confronting misinformation and disinformation reportedly culminated in leadership and staff departures at the Stanford Internet Observatory, an organization studying how social media platforms are abused. When Renée DiResta, the observatory’s former director, explained how opinion had shifted against the organization, she highlighted the important role of partisan social media influencers.
Recent BBC reporting also points to the central role of influencers in spreading Russian disinformation targeting U.S. voters, as do recent allegations from the Department of Justice that Russia provided financial support for several well-known conservative influencers.
These instances reflect the growing importance of the influencer economy more broadly and reporting by the BBC and allegations by the Justice Department help substantiate concern that some influencers are becoming vectors of malign foreign influence.
News stories such as these tend to focus on influencers with large followings, yet research indicates that it’s influencers with comparatively small followings who appear to be the most persuasive. Political organizations also approach these micro-influencers because they are relatively cheap to recruit and offer access to key demographic groups.
If these smaller-scale influencers are also being recruited, wittingly or unwittingly, to spread disinformation to U.S. audiences, researchers would have little ability to spot it. Meta’s new tools, for example, only allow for an examination of a subset of public users with at least 25,000 followers or who go through the process of receiving a verified badge, leaving many of the most prized influencers beyond large-scale examination by the research community.
The conversations around disinformation in 2024 have been dominated by AI, especially its ability to enhance the quality and quantity of disinformation encountered online. But I have so far focused instead on influencers because they offer a more direct solution to a key challenge faced by those seeking to target the U.S. public with disinformation: content distribution.
Compared to digital advertising, the influencer marketing space is largely unregulated, unmonitored and potentially as alluring an option for distributing targeted disinformation today as online advertisements were in 2016. At the same time, the research community is in a much worse position to assess these evolving tactics relative to where they were during the 2020 elections, or even the 2022 midterms.
What can be done today to confront disinformation in an environment where content moderation is increasingly viewed as overly partisan? The clearest answer may be “prebunking.”
Prebunking can include presenting a disinformation narrative along with counter-evidence debunking the claim or, less controversially, it can focus on explaining the tactics used to make disinformation persuasive. One such tactic includes the use of fictitious American-sounding “news” websites to host disinformation, such as The Houston Post, which was cited in the previously mentioned BBC reporting as the origin of disinformation recently targeting American voters.
Google deployed a widescale prebunking campaign educating millions of European voters in the leadup to this year’s European Union elections. They reportedly have no plans to launch similar prebunking campaigns in the U.S. because of broader fears that the practice could become politicized.
While focusing on common mis- and disinformation narratives appears too controversial, it is unclear why this controversy should extend to public education campaigns focused on tactics. Specific narratives may be partisan, but tactics — such as the deceptive use of fictitious news websites — are employed by propagandists across the political spectrum.
As policymakers work to enhance the research community’s ability to understand how these tactics are evolving, policymakers should start by deploying prebunking campaigns focused on teaching the public about known disinformation tactics.
R. Gordon Rinderknecht is an associate behavioral scientist at RAND, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research institution.
Date: |
-
Yahoo News - World
EU bans Algerian spread toasted on social media
Yesterday - European Union -
CBS News - Top stories
Meta launches Instagram for teens to address social media concerns
Meta bills the new Instagram service as having built-in protections for teens that give parents peace of mind.Yesterday -
The Guardian - World
Meta to introduce ‘teen accounts’ to Instagram as governments consider social media age limits
Meta says teen accounts will apply to new users under 16 and restrictions will eventually be extended to existing accounts used by teenagers. Meta is putting Instagram users under the age of 18 ...Yesterday -
Yahoo Sports - Sports
Patriots cut Jalen Reagor from practice squad after social media post
The Patriots have released WR Jalen Reagor from the practice squad hours after he made a cryptic post on Instagram.Yesterday -
Yahoo Sports - Sports
Patriots release former 1st-round pick Jalen Reagor after his cryptic social media post
There's a reasonable chance that the Patriots took issue with Reagor's less-than-flattering social media post on Tuesday.Yesterday - NFL -
MarketWatch - Business
Trump social-media stock ‘DJT’ slides nearly 3% after CNBC poll finds Harris defeating Trump in November
Trump Media’s stock has been mostly trending lower since mid-July.12 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Inc. - Business
Corporate America Cares Less and Less About Inflation
Fewer S&P 500 companies are mentioning inflation during earnings calls ahead of the Fed's first rate cut.Yesterday -
CNBC - Business
Trump Media shares sink more than 6% two days before merger 'lockup' period ends
Former President Donald Trump on Friday said he will not sell his stake in Trump Media, which owns the Republican's preferred social media app, Truth Social.Yesterday - Donald Trump -
CBS Sports - Sports
Jon Jones 'more than likely' planning to retire after UFC 309, hoping to train with Alex Pereira
Jones vs. Miocic might be a double retirement fight for the UFC heavyweight titleYesterday - UFC
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
US has worst healthcare system among wealthy nations, survey says
The United States healthcare system was deemed the worst overall in a new analysis of 10 similar nations by a leading health research nonprofit. "Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing ...2 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Marist polls: Harris leads Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin; they're tied in Pennsylvania
Vice President Kamala Harris is leading former President Donald Trump by 5 points in Michigan, is leading slightly in Wisconsin, and is tied in Pennsylvania, according to new Marist battleground ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
These 3 Dems, 14 Republicans crossed aisle on funding bill vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) government funding bill was sunk through the combined efforts of Democrats and Republicans in the lower chamber on Wednesday. Fourteen members of Johnson’s own ...3 hours ago - Republican Party -
The Hill - Politics
Trump vows to travel to Springfield following false pet-eating claims
Former President Trump pledged to travel to Springfield, Ohio, after false claims that he and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), have made about Haitian immigrants eating pets in the city. ...5 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Republican Arizona county chair endorses Democrat to replace him
The Republican chair of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in Arizona has endorsed a Democrat to replace him. "I am endorsing Joel [Navarro] because he is a man of integrity, because he is a ...6 hours ago