The supremely partisan court of Chief Justice Roberts
The Supreme Court has become a political clubhouse, consumed with optics, log-rolling and media leaks. Its decisions in certain matters are sourced not in the text, structure or history of the Constitution, but in the partisan policy choices of the justices.
Rudimentary principles of judicial ethics are swept under the rug. Requirements of impartiality are ignored. The court officially denies this criticism, but there is no refuting it.
The court was partisan when it decided Bush v. Gore, Shelby County v. Holder, Citizens United and Dobbs v. Women’s Health. But it has never been more partisan than its decisions in the trio of cases involving the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and former President Donald Trump. This proposition was elaborated in a New York Times article by Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak on Sunday.
The Times gives us a few bits of news that were not out there and a lot of backstory that we only suspected. The article’s spotlight of attention falls on Chief Justice John Roberts.
Many had seen Roberts as an institutionalist who cared about the public’s perception of the court. He said he feared that if the court is perceived as too partisan, it becomes a legislature, and the public will not respect its decisions.
In his 2005 confirmation hearings, Roberts famously told the Senate that he would judge like an umpire calling balls and strikes. He said: “Umpires don't make the rules; they apply them....It is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ballgame to see the umpire.”
What he said is nonsense.
After the court took its summer recess, constitutional law expert Stephen Vladeck wrote that the defining theme of the term had been Roberts turning “sharply to the right.” This week, Vladeck wrote, “What Sunday’s Kantor/Liptak piece drives home is that Roberts wasn’t pushed to go that way; he pushed the Court.”
The Times article features leaked internal documents and summaries of internal conversations, providing tremendous insights into the high court’s process.
In the Colorado ballot disqualification case, Kantor and Liptak report that there had been broad consensus on the court that the justices were going to reverse. This is hardly startling. But what we didn’t know is that the justices rushed to judgment to keep Trump on the ballot.
Roberts reportedly lobbied for a unanimous ruling, which is no surprise. But only five justices thought that Congress could only enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment through a statute, a position that fights the text and structure of the Constitution. Four justices were not so sure. The reporting indicates that Roberts was at the crossroads, and he went over the waterfall on the right.
As for the Trump immunity case, we learn from a leaked confidential memo that Roberts offered a “scathing critique” of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling. Most surprising — aside from the fact that the Times obtained the memo in the first place — is that Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch feared the timing of the case would “drag the court into political battles.”
When a judge decides a case involving political facts, he is inevitably dragged into “political battles.” There is nothing wrong with that. But why avoid “political battles” by coming down so hard on the side of a rogue former president and against accountability under law?
Although the April 25 oral argument foretold the ultimate outcome of the July 1 decision, Roberts gave no quarter to the liberals once the drafting of his opinion began. The chief justice ignored the text and original understanding of the Constitution to give Trump the healing benediction of immunity.
In Fischer, the Jan. 6 case involving the obstruction of congressional proceedings, the Times reported that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson strangely changed her vote well after the conference, suggesting that the initial vote was 5-4 to reverse. According to the article, in exchange for joining the majority, Jackson was able to push the other five justices toward a narrower opinion — one that limited the scope of the criminal obstruction statute, but that left open the possibility that the charges could be upheld by the lower courts on a more complete record.
You might wonder what leverage Jackson had, since her vote was not necessary for reversal. Perhaps Roberts, who has said that 5-4 decisions erode public confidence, obtained Jackson’s vote at the price of leaving a sliver of hope that the charges against Trump might ultimately be sustained.
The real gem is the reporting that the majority opinion in Fischer had originally been assigned to Justice Samuel Alito, only for Roberts to pull it on May 20 — assigning the opinion to himself more than a month after the justices voted on the outcome and the initial assignments made. The timing coincided with the Alito flag scandal — a story Kantor had broken on May 16, a Thursday, with the case reassigned the following Monday. Instead of demanding that Alito recuse, Roberts simply wrested the opinion away from him.
Roberts has more than earned his reactionary stripes. He wrote the opinion gutting the Voting Rights Act, dissented in the gay marriage case and voted to nullify Roe v. Wade. He ruled for Donald Trump in the trilogy of cases decided last term. He has refused to make Thomas and Alito recuse themselves in Trump cases where their bias spills out on the public record.
Roberts says he worries about the perception of the Supreme Court as partisan, but he has done nothing more than pay lip service to this principle. Thus, it was important to him for the immunity case to be heard and decided this term, so that Trump would be off the hook before the election. It was important to Roberts to take Alito’s name off the opinion in Fischer — even though it wasn’t important enough to make him recuse.
The Roberts court has become so political that it is driving itself to term limits. As FDR put it in a Fireside Chat to the nation on March 9, 1937: “We have, therefore, reached the point as a nation where we must take action to save the Constitution from the court and the court from itself."
James D. Zirin, author and legal analyst, is a former federal prosecutor in New York’s Southern District. He is also the host of the public television talk show and podcast Conversations with Jim Zirin.
Date: |
Topics
-
ESPN - Sports
Court reprimands LaLiga chief in CVC case appeal
LaLiga president Javier Tebas has been given a "public reprimand" by Spain's Administrative Sports Court (TAD) over a complaint made by Real Madrid.38 minutes ago -
NBC News - Top stories
Supreme Court rejects Green Party bid to appear on Nevada presidential ballot
The Supreme Court rejected Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein’s last-ditch request to be included on the ballot in Nevada, a key swing state.2 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Supreme Court declines to reinstate Jill Stein on Nevada’s ballot
The Supreme Court rejected the Nevada Green Party’s request for an emergency order putting its candidate, Jill Stein, on the presidential ballot in the key swing state. Without any noted dissents, ...2 hours ago -
The Guardian - World
Missing Kenyan anti-government protesters resurface as police chief appears in court
Anger had been growing at police chief Gilbert Masengeli after abductions of Jamil and Aslam Longton and Bob Njagi . Three Kenyans who were abducted last month after taking part in an ...1 hour ago -
CBS News - Politics
Supreme Court won't let Green Party candidate Jill Stein on Nevada ballot
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a bid to put Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on the Nevada general election ballot.2 hours ago -
BBC News - Top stories
Faster justice scheme rolled out across Scotland
A pilot scheme tested in five sheriff courts resulted in the early resolution of more than 500 cases.7 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
How whitewater rafters with partisan differences bridge divide in turbulent election season
Major Garrett shows how a group of about 30 Americans, with different political opinions, volunteered to embark on a whitewater rafting trip in the battleground state of North Carolina to find what ...3 hours ago -
Yahoo News - World
Iran's supreme leader pardons, commutes sentences of 3,000 prisoners
8 hours ago - Iran -
BBC News - Top stories
McNally murder accused a master manipulator, court told
Stephen McCullagh is accused of murdering his pregnant partner in her Lurgan home.5 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Eight Democrats vote to ax Biden’s EV rule
Eight Democrats voted with House Republicans in favor of overturning a Biden administration rule that’s expected to force automakers to make a significant portion of their fleet electric. The ...40 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
It’s almost too late to protect our elections from AI — Congress must act now
As AI becomes more widespread, the potential for electoral mischief will only grow.48 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Microsoft strikes deal to reopen Three Mile Island nuclear plant
Nuclear energy operator Constellation Energy will reopen the Three Mile Island facility in Pennsylvania, the site of a 1979 partial nuclear meltdown, as part of a deal with Microsoft to power data ...51 minutes ago - Microsoft -
The Hill - Politics
Robinson won't be at Trump's North Carolina rally Saturday
North Carolina gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson (R) will not be in attendance when former President Trump rallies supporters in the state on Saturday, a source told The Hill. Trump is ...56 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Stevie Wonder planning pre-election tour
Grammy-winning artist Stevie Wonder recently announced a 10-stop tour across the U.S. ahead of Election Day, now less than two months away. The concert tour — dubbed "Sing Your Song! As We Fix Our ...57 minutes ago