Justice Department asks Supreme Court to reinstate anti-money laundering law

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to issue an emergency order reinstating a federal anti-money laundering law as a legal battle plays out in a lower court.

Passed in 2021, the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) would require millions of business entities to disclose personal information about their owners by next month.

The law is on hold after a series of rulings that began when a federal district judge in Texas this month found the legislation likely exceeded Congress’s authority and blocked its enforcement. At the end of multiple whiplash decisions, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused the federal government’s request to reinstate the law as it appeals.

In an emergency application docketed Tuesday, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to revive the law as the government continues its appeal in the 5th Circuit, insisting the law is constitutional and that the lower court overreached.

“Contrary to the district court’s decision, the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause empower Congress to adopt the CTA’s reporting requirements,” the Justice Department wrote.

The law would require millions of small business entities by next month to provide information about their owners, like their dates of birth and addresses, to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), an arm of the Treasury Department aimed at combatting money laundering and other crimes. Violations can carry civil and criminal penalties.

The Biden administration argued that, at minimum, the lower court overreached by blocking the law universally, not just the parties who sued over the law.

The proper scope of such injunctions has been a recurring issue, and the government’s new filing floats that the Supreme Court could choose to immediately take up the new case to lay down the ground rules for lower judges. If the justices agree, the case would pose much broader implications for lawsuits challenging federal laws.

“This case, in its current posture, would provide an ideal vehicle for addressing the lawfulness of universal relief if the Court concludes, in light of the persistence of the practice and the ample percolation of the relevant issues, that the time has come to resolve the propriety of such relief,” U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote in the filing.

Four entities subject to the new law — a firearms dealer, an information technology company, a dairy farm and the Libertarian Party of Mississippi — as well as an owner of the tech company and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) sued over the law in May 2024.

“At a minimum, the injunction should be stayed except to the extent it protects respondents and the members of NFIB identified in the complaint,” the emergency application states.

The CTA has been the subject of multiple challenges, but courts have largely sided with the government in the other cases.

Topics

TikTok and Government Clash in Last Round of Supreme Court Briefs

The briefs, filed a week before oral arguments, offered sharply differing accounts of China’s influence over the site and the role of the First Amendment.
The New York Times - 5h
Federal court decision won't change California net neutrality law

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals blasted the FCC's attempts to regulate broadband internet, but state laws in California and New York remain intact.
Los Angeles Times - 7h
DOJ Takes the Dizzying Corporate Transparency Act Saga to the Supreme Court

The anti-money laundering law has been volleyed back and forth at the appeals level. Should businesses comply with its reporting requirements anyway?
Inc. - 1d
Judicial body won't refer Clarence Thomas to Justice Department over ethics lapses

The head of the Judicial Conference said there is legal uncertainty over whether it has the authority to refer complaints about Supreme Court justices.
NBC News - 1d
What grounds does Trump have to request a TikTok ban delay from the Supreme Court?

President-elect Donald Trump requested that the Supreme Court suspend the TikTok ban until after he takes office while he works on a political resolution. University of Minnesota Law School ...
CBS News - 1d
US agency does not have authority to reinstate net neutrality laws, court rules

Ruling a blow to Biden administration that had encouraged Federal Communications Commission to pursue goal. A US appeals court ruled on Thursday the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) did not ...
The Guardian - 1d
Chief Justice Roberts Condemns Threats to Supreme Court and Judiciary

In his year-end report on the federal judiciary, the chief justice decried violence, intimidation and disinformation and warned against defiance of court rulings.
The New York Times - 3d