Supreme Court to decide whether Oklahoma must execute death row inmate
Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma death row inmate, has been scheduled for execution nine times — and each time, he has avoided that fate following legal twists and turns.
Convicted for the 1997 killing of his former boss, Glossip has maintained his innocence for nearly three decades. Now, the state’s Republican attorney general has joined him in urging the Supreme Court to overturn his murder conviction and death sentence to grant him a new, fair trial.
That unlikely turn of events placed the rare capital punishment case before the justices, who will consider Glossip’s latest bid for freedom during arguments on Wednesday.
It’s not disputed that Barry Van Treese, a motel owner and Glossip’s former boss, was beaten to death by maintenance worker Justin Sneed; Sneed admitted to as much. But Oklahoma prosecutors said Glossip ordered him to carry out the crime in a murder-for-hire scheme.
Sneed evaded the death penalty by agreeing to plead guilty and testify against Glossip, instead earning a life sentence in prison for killing Van Treese. Glossip was found guilty and given a death sentence in 1998, but that conviction was overturned due to ineffective counsel on appeal; he was retried in 2004 and again convicted and sentenced to death.
Over the death row inmate’s objections, Oklahoma’s highest criminal appeals court upheld his conviction last year, and an execution date was scheduled for May 18, 2023.
In Glossip’s appeal to the Supreme Court, his attorneys told the justices Sneed, an “indispensable witness” in Glossip’s retrial, was not credible. They claim he lied about drug abuse and a psychiatric condition rendering him “potentially violent” — and that state prosecutors let that lie go uncorrected with the jury.
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond (R) has said he does not believe Glossip is innocent. But, in an extraordinary move, he submitted a brief to the justices in support of overturning Glossip’s death sentence following an “unfair and unreliable” trial.
“While the State previously opposed relief for Glossip, it has concluded, based on careful review of new information that recently came to light relating to prosecutorial misconduct at Glossip’s trial and cumulative error, that Glossip’s conviction and capital sentence cannot stand,” Drummond wrote in court filings.
Drummond also called the appeals court’s decision “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law,” suggesting it “cries out for correction.”
The Supreme Court stepped in to block his execution two weeks before he was set to die and in January agreed to hear his case.
It’s not the first time Glossip’s case has reached the Supreme Court. In 2015, his and two other Oklahoma death row inmates’ executions were halted by the court after they challenged the state’s lethal injection protocol.
The inmates argued the state’s use of midazolam violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment because the sedative does not entirely prevent prisoners from feeling the effects of two other drugs meant to cause death.
Ultimately, the justices ruled 5-4 against the inmates that states could use the drug. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Glossip and the other two inmates did not identify a less painful alternative.
Glossip’s latest appeal to the Supreme Court has seen significant support, drawing scores of friend-of-the-court briefs from current and former state and federal prosecutors, civil liberties groups and more than a half-dozen states. Celebrities including Kim Kardashian and television star Phil McGraw, better known as Dr. Phil, also spoke out in Glossip’s support.
However, the family of victim Van Treese has strongly condemned the derailment of Glossip’s execution. In an amicus brief to the court, topped with a portrait of Van Treese, they wrote that “today —10,047 days later — the Van Treese family has an interest in seeing Oklahoma’s duly imposed sentence on Glossip carried out without further delay.”
The family suggested Drummond, the attorney general, sensed a potential “political opportunity” in Glossip’s case when he ordered review. They asked to be heard before the justices, but the high court declined to include them in arguments.
Because the state is not arguing that Glossip’s execution should go forward, the justices appointed lawyer Christopher Michel, a former law clerk to Chief Justice John Roberts and to Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he served on an appeals court, to make that argument.
Although Glossip and the state have asked the Supreme Court to allow him a new trial, the justices could decide that they do not have the jurisdiction to review the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision to uphold his conviction and death sentence. The justices added that question when granting the case.
A decision is expected next summer.
Date: |
-
Top stories - ABC News
Oklahoma death row inmate had three 'last meals.' He's back at Supreme Court in new bid for freedom
Nine times the state of Oklahoma has set a date to execute death row inmate Richard GlossipYesterday -
Top stories - The New York Times
Richard Glossip, Death Row Inmate in Oklahoma, Has Unusual Ally: State’s Attorney General
Both sides told the Supreme Court that long-suppressed evidence about the state’s star witness undermined the case against the inmate, Richard Glossip.12 hours ago -
World - ABC News
Japan prosecutors will not appeal acquittal of world's longest death-row inmate in retrial
Japanese prosecutors say they will not appeal the acquittal of the world’s longest-serving death-row inmate in a retrial last month, bringing closure to the 1966 murder case after more than a ...9 hours ago -
Top stories - CBS News
Supreme Court won't decide Texas dispute over emergency abortions
In turning away the case, the Supreme Court leaves in place a lower court order that blocked emergency abortion care if it violates Texas' near-total ban.Yesterday - Abortion -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court asked to consider Oklahoma religious charter school's case
Oklahoma’s charter school board says it has asked the Supreme Court to reverse a decision ruling the nation’s first publicly funded religious charter school unconstitutional. The board’s petition ...Yesterday -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won’t hear Pennsylvania legislators' challenge to executive actions expanding voting access
The Supreme Court decided Monday that it won’t take up a case to restore a lawsuit by Pennsylvania Republicans that challenged executive actions expanding voting access on the basis that only state ...Yesterday -
Business - CNBC
Supreme Court rejects Martin Shkreli fine appeal
Martin Shkreli in 2022 was banned from the pharmaceutical industry and ordered to disgorge profits earned from raising the price of the drug Daraprim.Yesterday -
Business - Inc.
Supreme Court Will Tackle Workplace Discrimination Case This Term
The high court’s docket includes cases that could recast the threshold for hiring bias claims, as well as suits addressing guns, transgender rights and online pornography.Yesterday -
Top stories - The New York Times
Supreme Court, Back on the Bench, Is Diligent and Dour
The justices considered a routine case on unemployment benefits in characteristic style, peppering the lawyers with questions and dropping hints about their views.Yesterday
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Trump-Putin calls, Biden's beefs: 6 newsy nuggets from Woodward’s new book
Veteran reporter Bob Woodward's latest book "War" is generating headlines, this time with a story that former President Trump had a number of conversations after he left the White House with ...29 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
Courting Wisconsin voters, Biden touts clean water and hits the GOP’s record
President Biden touted his administration’s efforts to remove lead and other toxic substances from drinking water as he tried to make the Democrats’ case for voters in the swing state of Wisconsin. ...35 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
Porn stars launch campaign against Project 2025 targeting swing states
Concerned with provisions of Project 2025 that could criminalize pornography, a group of porn stars is jumping into the 2024 election, launching “Hands Off My Porn” and purchasing $100,000 in ads ...35 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Trump seizes on Harris 'not a thing that comes to mind' Biden remark
Former President Trump and his allies on Tuesday seized on a comment from Vice President Harris in which she said there was “not a thing that comes to mind” that she would have done differently ...37 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
Harris steps up her media game
Welcome to The Hill's Campaign newsletter {beacon} Campaign Report Campaign Report The Big Story Harris steps up her media game Vice President Harris is stepping up her media game with a blitz ...55 minutes ago - Kamala Harris