Supreme Court declines to take up ‘dark money’ case
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge to San Francisco’s "Sunlight on Dark Money" disclosure law, which would have tested the limits of disclosure and free speech in campaign finance.
San Francisco voters overwhelmingly approved the initiative in 2019, compelling election ads to include a disclaimer naming the top three donors to the group running the ad.
If the donor is another committee, then the committee’s top two donors and the dollar amounts given by both need to be disclosed.
The law is “about having a better-informed electorate and making sure that people who are giving big checks in local politics don't do it secretly, but do it publicly,” said Jon Golinger, a democracy advocate at Public Citizen who helped draft the San Francisco law.
But plaintiffs called the secondary disclosure requirements overly burdensome and alleged they would "scare away donors,” infringing on their constitutional rights.
They were represented by the First Amendment advocates at the Institute for Free Speech, a conservative nonprofit that regularly opposes political spending and contribution restrictions.
The Institute for Free Speech petitioned the Supreme Court in February to consider two questions: whether the disclosure requirement “advances any important or compelling state interest,” and if the law “violates the First Amendment freedoms of speech and association.”
“San Francisco’s secondary donor on-communication disclosure requirement forces the Committee to either give up its protected First Amendment right to speak about a candidate or proclaim the City’s message as part of its speech,” the original complaint argued.
Both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected their argument.
“In response to the growing prevalence of money in politics, many governments have required groups that run political advertisements to identify their funding sources publicly,” Circuit Court Judge Susan Graber wrote in the opinion.
The disclosure requirement “is substantially related to the governmental interest in informing voters of the source of funding for election-related communications,” Graber concluded, and “does not create an excessive burden on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights relative to that interest.”
The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal in a brief, unsigned order.
Date: |
-
Health - ABC News
Supreme Court declines Biden administration appeal in Texas emergency abortion case
Court let stand decision barring emergency abortions that violate law in Texas.42 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won’t take up challenge to Jack Smith’s Trump Twitter data access
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge by social platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to court rulings that forced the platform to turn over data on former President Trump’s ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Business - Inc.
Supreme Court Will Tackle Workplace Discrimination Case This Term
The high court’s docket includes cases that could recast the threshold for hiring bias claims, as well as suits addressing guns, transgender rights and online pornography.1 hour ago -
Entertainment - ABC News
Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from singer R. Kelly, convicted of child sex crimes
The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the singer R. Kelly, who is now serving 20 years in prison after being convicted of child sex convictions in Chicago2 hours ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court declines to resuscitate Georgia Republican’s racketeering suit against Fox News
The Supreme Court will not revive a Georgia Republican’s far-fetched lawsuit against Fox News accusing the conservative news company of racketeering and conspiring to elect his opponent in a 2022 ...2 hours ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court won't hear arguments in Texas emergency abortion case
The Supreme Court decided not to hear arguments in a case involving Texas that could have provided an answer about whether a state abortion ban conflicts with a federal emergency care law. The ...2 hours ago - Abortion -
Top stories - ABC News
Supreme Court won't hear appeal from Elon Musk’s X platform over warrant in Trump case
Prosecutors got search warrant in the election-interference case against Trump.1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
Top stories - CBS News
Supreme Court convenes for new term, here's a look at some of the cases they're hearing
The U.S. Supreme Court is reconvening for its new session Monday. The court's docket includes cases dealing with the regulation of so-called ghost guns and the controversial concept of medical ...32 minutes ago -
Business - CNBC
Supreme Court rejects Martin Shkreli fine appeal
Martin Shkreli in 2022 was banned from the pharmaceutical industry and ordered to disgorge profits earned from raising the price of the drug Daraprim.38 minutes ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Abandon Harris campaign endorses Jill Stein
The “Abandon Harris” group pushing for voters to protest Vice President Harris over the conflict in Gaza is endorsing the Green Party’s Jill Stein in the presidential race. The group, formerly ...29 minutes ago - Kamala Harris -
Politics - The Hill
Schumer: Oct. 7 'will go down in infamy'
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the highest-ranking Jewish elected leader in American history, marked the first anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in Israel as a “day that will ...35 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Trump agenda would add twice as much to national debt as Harris's: Budget group
A new estimate finds that former President Trump’s tax and spending plans could add twice as much to the national debt as those brought by Vice President Harris, amounting to more than $7 trillion ...35 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
How the US can help Lebanon move past Hezbollah
The current ruling class in Lebanon must overcome its own Stockholm syndrome.35 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Charlamagne tha God knocks Republicans over false Helene response claims: 'Everything can't be politicized'
Charlamagne tha God is speaking out against what he describes as "lies created by the GOP" surrounding the federal government's response to Hurricane Helene. "It's actually nuts that at a time like ...42 minutes ago - Republican Party