Supporting Israel isn’t enough — the Islamic Republic must go
On Oct. 1, Iran launched nearly 200 ballistic missiles against Israel in retaliation for an Israeli strike that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Israeli air defenses, with substantial support from the U.S. Air Force, intercepted most of the missiles. However, a large-scale Israeli response seems inevitable now, raising concerns about a broader conflict.
Although fears of an all-out war are exaggerated, the looming confrontation between the two states forces the U.S. to confront the consequences of decades of policies that have contributed to this crisis.
Anti-Zionism and anti-Americanism have long been central to the ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran, serving as revolutionary principles that legitimize the regime before its base. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei frequently refers to "the enemy" in his speeches, emphasizing these themes repeatedly.
In the U.S., such rhetoric is often dismissed as political posturing for domestic audiences. There is truth to this interpretation. But decades of such rhetoric have created a demand for action among the regime’s supporters.
The Islamic Republic, despite not being a democracy, still has its own internal politics and is responsive to its core base to stay in power. The recent missile attack was likely intended to appease this base, with Khamenei hoping that the U.S. would restrain Israeli retaliation, as it had done in previous confrontations, allowing him to save face.
Hostilities are unlikely to end as long as both Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran remain intact, as the regime in Tehran risks losing its legitimacy if it fails to meet its ideological commitments.
U.S. policy has consistently underestimated this ideological drive, contributing to the current tensions. For decades, the U.S. has rightly provided military support to Israel while failing to take adequate measures to curb Iran's military ambitions. Under Democratic administrations, U.S. policy has facilitated Iran’s militarization through sanctions relief and the release of frozen assets.
Achieving peace between Israel and Iran is impossible as long as the Islamic Republic remains in power. The U.S. has historically avoided a policy of regime change in Iran. Democratic administrations’ financial concessions have even extended the regime’s life.
The U.S. must change course — beginning with a recognition that its concerns about a full-scale regional war are baseless.
Iran and Israel do not share a common border, making the deployment of ground forces impractical. The logistical challenges of moving large Iranian forces through Iraq and Syria render such scenarios unrealistic, as neither country is eager to invite conflict onto its soil. Moreover, Israel’s air superiority and military capabilities would neutralize any attempt by Iran to mobilize forces at such a distance. Finally, the Islamic Republic doesn’t trust its own population with arms. A young Iranian mockingly summed it up on Twitter: “Now that there’s a war, I have to ask the politicians, will you trust us with guns?”
Simply put, Iran’s only advantage over Israel is its large population, which is a useless card as the table is currently set.
This will be an air war, where Israel holds significant advantages. Israel’s air defense has already proven its ability to stop Iranian missile attacks, and Iran’s air fleet is aging and poses little threat — 1960s-designed F-14s are its most advanced fighters, and these are largely not operational due to spare parts shortages. Reports suggest that Russia's promised Su-35 fighter jets have yet to be delivered to Iran, further weakening its aerial capabilities.
Israel’s immediate focus will likely be on targeting Iran’s oil facilities and conventional military infrastructure rather than its nuclear facilities; Israel will come back to the nuclear question after the Lebanon campaign is over.
The U.S. should put aside its apprehensions and support Israel’s efforts. To do this, U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria should be placed on high alert with the authority to engage Iran’s proxies, who are more mercenaries than ideological fighters, as is evident from their lack of suicide missions. The U.S. Air Force should continue to provide critical air defense support to Israel, while the U.S. Navy should secure the Eastern Mediterranean to prevent any Iranian submarine attacks. Additionally, the U.S. military should employ its electronic warfare capabilities to disrupt Iran’s communications and undermine its air defenses.
This campaign is likely to be swift but could have long-term repercussions. Even if the United States remains committed to negotiating a nuclear agreement with Iran, a decisive show of force would strengthen its position in any future talks. Within Iran, such a defeat would undermine the regime’s credibility among its supporters, leading to a potential crisis of legitimacy.
The U.S. should take this opportunity to adopt a more proactive stance toward regime change in Iran. Renewing and strictly enforcing sanctions will weaken the Islamic Republic’s security forces. A leaked memorandum from 2022 on the state of the security forces read like an assessment of the Tsar’s army in 1916. Restoration of economic pressure could lead to defections or at least reduce the rank and file’s willingness to suppress future protests.
Moreover, the U.S. should engage both publicly and covertly to challenge the regime’s legitimacy, particularly among Iran’s conservative youth. Highlighting the regime’s failure to fulfill its revolutionary promises could erode its base of support, making its collapse more feasible.
Simultaneously, the U.S. must strengthen its engagement with both domestic and diaspora opposition groups to empower the Iranian people in their struggle against the regime. The ultimate goal should be for the Iranian people to lead their own revolution, just as Israel addresses its security challenges, with the U.S. playing a supportive role in both instances.
The U.S. must accept that, due to its own policies, a war between Iran and Israel became inevitable. But this moment also represents the most significant opportunity for the greatest change in the region since 1979. To ensure that this change benefits both regional stability and American interests, the U.S. must fully support Israel's military actions while strategically leveraging the fallout to encourage regime change in Iran.
Shay Khatiri is vice president of development and senior fellow of the Yorktown Institute.
Date: | |
Tag: | Israel |
Topics
-
Top stories - NBC News
U.S. supports Israel's 'limited' campaign in Lebanon in hopes of a weakened Hezbollah
President Joe Biden’s administration is signaling that it supports Israel’s operations against Iran-backed Hezbollah and Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon.20 hours ago - Israel -
Sports - Yahoo Sports
Golden State Warriors 2024-25 season preview: Is Steph Curry's supporting cast good enough?
Breaking down Golden State's biggest question, best- and worst-case scenarios, and fantasy outlook.Yesterday - NBA -
Top stories - BBC News
US gives Israel 30 days to boost Gaza aid or risk cut to military support
The letter, sent on Sunday, amounts to the strongest known written warning from the US to its ally.9 hours ago - Israel -
Top stories - The New York Times
Egg Freezing Isn’t a Choice For Most Latinas. But It Was For Me.
As a Latina, I was taught that my purpose was to produce. But I needed a break.Yesterday -
World - Financial Times
Nigeria’s economic transformation must succeed
Failure would set back the cause of reform across sub-Saharan Africa28 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
America’s trade deficit isn’t about Trump or Biden — it’s about the WTO
The World Trade Organization has become an obstacle to improving the U.S. trade balance, as it grants "developing country" status to nations like China, allowing them to receive trade concessions, ...Yesterday - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
The top election issue isn’t the economy or immigration — it's Trump's unfitness to lead
Brashness, braggadocio, mockery and brutishness are not strengths.Yesterday
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Half the country will vote for Trump. What is his appeal?
Donald Trump's appeal is based on uniting three strands of conservatism, aversion to government, aversion to change, and aversion to difference, and he has been able to do this by his authenticity.31 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Florida health officials sued for censorship over abortion campaign ad
The citizen-led ballot initiative Floridians Protecting Freedom has filed a lawsuit against state health officials alleging political speech has been censored in the state. The Florida Department ...33 minutes ago - Abortion -
Politics - The Hill
How Democrats can get Black men off the fence and to the polls
Democrats must frame voting as an opportunity for these men to not only secure their bag but to strengthen our democracy too.46 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Harris, Schiff hold commanding leads in California
Vice President Harris and Democratic Senate candidate Adam Schiff hold wide leads over their Republican rivals in their respective races, according to a new polling. Polling from Emerson College ...49 minutes ago - California -
Politics - The Hill
Omarosa: Trump 'dictated' doctors' letters about his medical history
Omarosa Manigault Newman claimed that former President Trump “dictated” what doctors wrote about his medical history during a Tuesday evening CNN appearance. “Let’s recall that Donald Trump ...53 minutes ago - Donald Trump