Memo to podcasters: Free speech does not justify promoting antisemitism

Joe Rogan, America’s most popular podcaster, recently hosted Darryl Cooper, a Holocaust revisionist and pseudo-historian known for defending Nazi Germany. For almost three hours, Rogan gave Cooper a platform to defend Hitler, downplay the Holocaust and even joined Cooper in describing the current surge in antisemitism as mere Jewish “overreaction.”

This came just weeks after Rogan similarly let “independent researcher” Ian Carroll spew antisemitic diatribes about Jewish world domination. Comedian Theo Von, another massively popular podcaster, this month gave far-right activist Candace Owens a platform to spread antisemitic conspiracy theories about a worldwide Jewish pedophile ring.

With all this coming after Tucker Carlson openly defended Iran and Qatar — just months after hosting Cooper himself and Vladimir Putin — it is painfully clear that conservative media has declined since the days of William F. Buckley.

Contemporary media influencers gain attention by courting controversy. Figures like Carlson and Rogan build their brands by showcasing inflammatory figures who make dangerously a b surd statements, justify atrocities or simply shill for hostile foreign governments. When criticized, these figures rarely take responsibility, instead claiming they are just “asking questions” or “engaging different views.” When challenged, they and their supporters cry “censorship” or “cancel culture” before digging in their heels.

However they see themselves, provocateurs like Rogan and Carlson aren’t free speech warriors. Their platforming of extremism is not morally neutral. The First Amendment guarantees protection from government censorship, but it doesn’t absolve individuals from using their platforms responsibly — and it certainly does not compel the public to listen.

It’s not censorship for private citizens to guard and govern public discourse — it’s responsible citizenship. When podcasters invoke free speech rights to justify platforming vicious thoughts, they trade on the social contract of self-governance that keeps that right safe from government intervention. But individuals have a responsibility to oppose harmful ideas and to call for their removal from public discourse.

It is laughable to argue that “just asking questions” or “having discussions” about harmful ideas has no impact on their prevalence. Parents of toddlers knows that entertaining an idea invites its recurrence. To engage in “discussions” with a toddler who demands that his or her dinner consist only of Oreos would signal the possibility of a future Oreo dinner. In the same way, “asking questions” that amplify extreme and vicious ideas merely normalizes extremism and false information in society.

Research demonstrates that repeated exposure to false or extreme claims, even those framed as mere speculation, makes people perceive those claims as more plausible or true. Thus, by uncritically presenting inflammatory views, figures like Rogan, Carlson and Von are not simply “having conversations” — they are reinforcing and legitimizing harmful ideas, especially when they describe these ideas as “nuanced” or “comprehensive,” as Rogan did to Cooper. This shifts the “Overton window” toward making antisemitism, and other forms of extremism, mainstream.

Podcasting is a newer medium, but normalizing extremism under the guise of “just asking questions” is an old trick. Indeed, George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party, employed it over six decades ago. He said, “If you are denied some of the facts or if the facts are twisted or misrepresented then you cannot possibly guide the ship of state.” The “facts” Rockwell referred to were the same antisemitic libels featured on Rogan’s and Von’s shows — to say nothing of Rockwell’s equally repugnant beliefs about other minorities. Just as a responsible parent should not entertain their toddlers’ unhealthy dietary preferences, a responsible citizen should not entertain the normalization of hateful extremism.

This isn’t to say that good-faith discussions about controversial topics cannot occur. There are countless examples of difficult and even painful discussions exploring different sides of an issue, even ones as fraught as antisemitism.

However, there’s a distinction between genuine discourse and uncritically platforming extremism. Rogan, Von and their crowd have done the latter. Simply nodding along, as Rogan and Von did while their guests made claims about secret Jewish control of America is not a “conversation,” and it most certainly is not “asking questions.” It is a passive endorsement of Jew hatred.

Furthermore, platforming these claims has real-world consequences. Owens and her antisemitic conspiracies — the same ones she advanced on Von’s podcast — were explicitly referenced by a school shooter in Nashville, who said Owens motivated him “above all” in his pursuit of “violence and extremism.” If thought leaders wish to claim they are simply “having conversations,” then they must either call out extremism or refuse to platform it.

However, media figures aren’t solely responsible for which ideas take root in society. Influence and popularity — and thus social power — is granted by those who choose to listen. This means that even if we can’t stop Rogan from giving Cooper three hours to spew Holocaust denial to an audience of millions, we can choose not to join that audience, not even by “hate-watching” or “hate-listening.”

As the adage goes, there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Such figures as Rogan, Von and Owens know how to turn outrage into influence, just as George Lincoln Rockwell did decades ago. Attention, even negative attention, grows their influence. Thus, listeners are ultimately responsible for the spread of extremism and lies.

Free speech is a right that implies responsibility. The First Amendment protects against government censorship, but it doesn’t compel anyone to platform extremism, nor does it absolve audiences of examining the consequences of their consumption. Viewers and listeners must hold media figures accountable for what they platform.

Refusing to engage with hateful, extremist nonsense isn’t censorship. It is the bare minimum for responsible citizenship, and no amount of crying “cancel culture” can change that.

Dr. Aaron Pomerantz is a social psychologist and research fellow at Rice University’s Doerr Institute for New Leaders and a Middle East Peace fellow with Young Voices.

Topics

Bondi says judge has 'no right' to ask flight deportation questions

Attorney General Pam Bondi said the district judge who ordered the Trump administration to return deportation flights over the weekend has “no right” to be asking questions about the specifics. ...
The Hill - 2d
Arrest of Mahmoud Khalil raises legal questions around deporting legal permanent residents

The arrest of Mahmoud Khaili has led to questions about how a legal permanent resident could face deportation — and what it could mean for issues of free speech on college campuses.
NBC News - Mar. 11
ASK IRA: Does Tyler Herro have the Heat rethinking his impending extension window?

Q: Doesn’t Tyler Herro realize he is playing for an extension? He has really struggled since the All-Star Game. – Andrew. A: No question. It is one thing to thrive when there at least is the threat ...
Yahoo Sports - 5d
Is the case against pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil about immigration or free speech?

Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil's lawyers were in court to argue against his deportation. CBS News' Katrina Kaufman has more on the legal proceedings and how the case may involve two ...
CBS News - Mar. 12
Ann Coulter questions arrest of Columbia protester on free speech grounds

Conservative media pundit Ann Coulter on Monday questioned the arrest of a pro-Palestinian advocate on free speech grounds. "There's almost no one I don't want to deport, but unless they've ...
The Hill - Mar. 10
California governor raises questions with ‘This is Gavin Newsom’ podcast

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) new podcast hosting prominent supporters of President Trump is raising questions about his political strategy as he wraps up his tenure as governor and keeps the ...
The Hill - 5d
Have a question about the Wisconsin Badgers heading into March Madness and the NCAA tournament? Ask me!

You can submit your question and I'll choose some to answer before the Badgers play their first-round game Thursday against Montana.
Yahoo Sports - 4d
Amorim: Players can't argue with Ratcliffe criticism

Ruben Amorim has told his Manchester United players that they cannot have any complaints about criticism from co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
ESPN - Mar. 13
Sunny Hostin: Newsom podcast with conservatives 'poor strategy'

Sunny Hostin, co-host of ABC's "The View," tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over his newly launched podcast, which has served as a platform for discussion between the likely 2028 ...
The Hill - Mar. 13

Memo to podcasters: Free speech does not justify promoting antisemitism

Topics

Related

Bondi says judge has 'no right' to ask flight deportation questions

Arrest of Mahmoud Khalil raises legal questions around deporting legal permanent residents

ASK IRA: Does Tyler Herro have the Heat rethinking his impending extension window?

Is the case against pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil about immigration or free speech?

Ann Coulter questions arrest of Columbia protester on free speech grounds

California governor raises questions with ‘This is Gavin Newsom’ podcast

Have a question about the Wisconsin Badgers heading into March Madness and the NCAA tournament? Ask me!

Amorim: Players can't argue with Ratcliffe criticism

Sunny Hostin: Newsom podcast with conservatives 'poor strategy'

More from The Hill

Trump administration sued over shuttering of VOA

Burchett calls for government transparency on UAPs, spending: 'We deserve to know'

24 House Democrats blast SBA over plans to relocate 6 regional offices

Watch live: Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez take 'Fight Oligarchy' tour to Denver

Merkley launches DOGE whistleblower portal

More in Politics

Trump administration sued over shuttering of VOA

Burchett calls for government transparency on UAPs, spending: 'We deserve to know'

24 House Democrats blast SBA over plans to relocate 6 regional offices

Watch live: Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez take 'Fight Oligarchy' tour to Denver

Merkley launches DOGE whistleblower portal