Judge reverses Trump firing of employee appeals board member

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the Trump administration’s firing of a federal employee appeals board member was unlawful.
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled in favor of Cathy Harris, who chaired the three-person Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) during the Biden administration. He indefinitely reinstated her to her post on the board, writing that federal law prevents presidents from removing members of the MSPB without cause.
“The President’s attempt to terminate Harris was unlawful,” Contreras wrote in a 35-page decision.
The order allows Harris to return to her post, granting her full access to the benefits of her office while barring the Trump administration from recognizing any other person as a member of the MSPB in her position.
Harris was fired via a one-sentence email from the Presidential Personnel Office last month. She had four years left in her seven-year term on the MSPB, from which the president can only remove members for “inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.”
Contreras’s order dictates Harris will continue to serve as a member of the board for the duration of her term unless she’s removed for one of those reasons.
During a hearing Monday over injunctive relief, Justice Department lawyer Jeremy Newman said the Constitution vests in the president “sole authority and duty” over the executive branch, including over firings. The president must be able to remove at will principal officers who exercise executive power, he argued.
Nathaniel Zelinsky, a lawyer for Harris, called the government’s theory of the case “breathtaking,” suggesting it amounted to empowering the president to “fire anyone in the executive branch” while Congress “can’t do anything about it.”
“The plaintiff deserves relief in this case,” he said.
Contreras ruled that the MSPB falls within the scope of Supreme Court precedent giving Congress the power to specify the length of members’ terms and determine under which circumstances the president may remove those members.
“The President thus lacks the power to remove Harris from office at will,” the judge wrote. “Because the President did not indicate that he sought to remove Harris for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, his attempt to terminate her was unlawful and exceeded the scope of his authority.”
Harris’s is one of several lawsuits challenging firings of independent federal agency leaders with statutory removal protections. The head of the Office of Special Counsel, plus Democratic appointees to multimember commissions such as the National Labor Relations Board and Federal Labor Relations Authority, have also challenged their firings.
A different federal judge ruled Saturday that Trump’s firing of OSC Director Hampton Dellinger was unlawful, which the Justice Department quickly appealed.
That case already reached the Supreme Court, though the justices punted on the Trump administration’s request to wipe the lower court’s temporary reinstatement of the official. The challenge will likely return there soon.
Contreras acknowledged Monday that his ruling would likely be appealed to the high court in short order, as well.
“That’s where all of us are heading,” the judge quipped.
Topics
-
Trump illegally removed member of board protecting government employees, judge rules
President Donald Trump unlawfully removed a member of a federal office that protects government employees from partisan interference, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.ABC News - 2h -
Judge Says Trump Can’t Fire Chair of Federal Workers Board Without Cause
Cathy Harris had sued to block her dismissal from the panel that handles government employee disputes. Employees swept up in the Trump administration’s mass firings have appealed to the board.The New York Times - 20m -
How a low-profile federal board could host appeals for thousands of fired government workers
Thousands of federal workers fired in recent days by the Trump administration may be able to use an appeals process to get reinstated in their jobs — and potentially receive back pay.NBC News - Feb. 24 -
Request to block mass firing of probationary employees denied by judge
A judge has denied labor unions' request to temporarily block the administration from carrying out mass firing of probationary employees and deferred resignation offers.ABC News - Feb. 21 -
Judge orders rescission of OPM memos directing agencies to fire probationary employees
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to rescind memos that directed agencies across the federal government to fire probationary employees, finding they were ...The Hill - 4d -
Judge rules mass firings of federal probationary employees likely illegal
He ordered the Office of Personnel Management to tell certain federal agencies it couldn't order the firings of probationary employees, including at the Defense Department.CBS News - 4d -
Trump Claims Power to Fire Administrative Law Judges at Will
The Justice Department said a law protecting the officials from arbitrary removal is an unconstitutional intrusion on presidential authority.The New York Times - Feb. 21 -
Judge orders DOGE employee to testify in lawsuit against the Trump administration
U.S. District Judge John Bates called the Department of Government Efficiency's work "opaque" as he ordered an official to shed more light on its structure and activity.NBC News - 4d
More from The Hill
-
How Trump's new tariffs will affect Americans: 5 things to know
President Trump kicked off a trade war on Tuesday, levying major tariffs on the top three U.S. trading partners — Canada, Mexico and China. He imposed 25-percent import taxes on Canada and Mexico, ...The Hill - 42m -
US aid cuts are expanding Chinese influence
China is rapidly filling the vacuum left by the Trump administration's decision to freeze and reduce foreign aid, using strategic lending and infrastructure investments to counter American ...The Hill - 49m -
Hubris and conceit: Why Musk is having so much trouble as czar
Musk represents a pernicious feature of the modern presidency, that the executive has all the answers and need not be constrained by supposedly outmoded constitutional and legal considerations.The Hill - 49m -
FAA union president says DOGE fired essential employees without assessment
Dave Spero, the president of a union representing employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), said at a Tuesday hearing that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) fired ...The Hill - 55m -
Refiners' trade group: Tariffs won't make US energy secure, lower consumer costs
A refiners’ trade group knocked President Trump for his 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico, both neighboring nations known for having the largest bilateral free trade agreements with the ...The Hill - 59m
More in Politics
-
How Trump's new tariffs will affect Americans: 5 things to know
President Trump kicked off a trade war on Tuesday, levying major tariffs on the top three U.S. trading partners — Canada, Mexico and China. He imposed 25-percent import taxes on Canada and Mexico, ...The Hill - 42m -
US aid cuts are expanding Chinese influence
China is rapidly filling the vacuum left by the Trump administration's decision to freeze and reduce foreign aid, using strategic lending and infrastructure investments to counter American ...The Hill - 49m -
Hubris and conceit: Why Musk is having so much trouble as czar
Musk represents a pernicious feature of the modern presidency, that the executive has all the answers and need not be constrained by supposedly outmoded constitutional and legal considerations.The Hill - 49m -
FAA union president says DOGE fired essential employees without assessment
Dave Spero, the president of a union representing employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), said at a Tuesday hearing that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) fired ...The Hill - 55m -
Refiners' trade group: Tariffs won't make US energy secure, lower consumer costs
A refiners’ trade group knocked President Trump for his 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico, both neighboring nations known for having the largest bilateral free trade agreements with the ...The Hill - 59m