Is Britain’s ‘green’ foreign policy innovative or mere posturing?
Britain’s new foreign secretary, David Lammy, has been in office for 11 weeks. Restless and energetic by nature, he had been preparing for the job for two-and-a-half years. He is now impatient to reshape U.K. foreign policy and show that the recently elected Labour government is very different from its Conservative predecessor.
Lammy is a political veteran. He became a Member of Parliament a quarter of a century ago at the age of 27 and was a government minister under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. A Harvard Law School alum who practiced as an attorney in California in the late 1990s, he is a forceful speaker who knows how to grab headlines. This flair for publicity was on full display on Sept. 17, when he made his first set-piece speech on international affairs at the Royal Botanic Gardens on “the most profound and universal source of global disorder — the climate and nature emergency.”
Today, even to address the issue of climate change is to make ears prick up on both left and right. Where once there was widespread consensus on the case for global warming, there is now sharp division. Former President Donald Trump has downplayed the extent of the human contribution to climate change and dismissed global warming as a "hoax," while five years ago this week an angry Greta Thunberg blinked back tears and berated the UN Climate Action Summit for its failings.
Lammy pulled no punches. The climate crisis is “the central geopolitical challenge of our age,” a threat “more fundamental” than “a terrorist or an imperialist autocrat.” He warned: “It is systemic. It’s pervasive. And accelerating towards us at pace.”
This comparison with terrorism and “an imperialist autocrat,” presumably loose code for Vladimir Putin, is dramatic. Lammy’s underlying argument is that the effects of a changing climate are not separate from traditional issues of geopolitics and international security; rather, they are intimately intertwined with them. He promised that during his tenure “action on the climate and nature crisis will be central to all that the Foreign Office does.”
Lammy is not wholly wrong. Whatever one’s views on the cause and extent of climate change, it is already having an effect on global security. Melting ice in the Arctic is opening up previously inaccessible reserves of oil and gas, and in response Russia has reopened Cold War-era military bases and redrawn its naval strategy to reinforce its territorial claims.
Increasingly inhospitable conditions in the Sahel have contributed both to political instability in that African region and to increasing migration towards Europe. Some analysts have argued that a protracted period of drought contributed to the Syrian civil war, which has so far killed 618,000 people and displaced 13 million. These are “facts on the ground” that Western foreign policy has to take into account.
On the other hand, climate change is not the same type of threat as terrorism or state aggression, and it is much more susceptible to methodical scientific analysis and mitigation. This creates the danger that Lammy’s publicity-seeking narrative may be viewed as scaremongering or distorting the government’s priorities. In the U.S., one in five people thinks human activity has little or no effect on climate change, and a quarter of Republican voters believe the federal government is already doing too much to mitigate environmental changes.
As the American presidential election draws ever closer, British politics is becoming fixated on the possible consequences of a victory for Vice President Kamala Harris or Trump. The Labour government knows it would have a much more comfortable and harmonious relationship with a Democratic president, but it is also aware that polls show only a slender lead for Harris, with a real possibility of a Trump victory. If that happens, will Lammy’s bold stance come back to haunt him?
The foreign secretary has already had to explain away a track record of critical remarks about Trump. While he has built some bridges with figures in Trump’s circle — like Elbridge Colby, a possible National Security Advisor in the event of a GOP victory — his decision to place climate change at the center of British foreign policy risks a sharp difference in approach.
A likely Trump approach to the world includes an energy boom based on fossil fuel, scrapping investment in “meaningless Green New Scam ideas” and a second withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change. Lammy could scarcely have chosen an area in which there are more potentially deep divisions between the U.S. and the U.K.
The foreign secretary’s fundamental analysis, that changes in the environment are what NATO describes as a “threat multiplier,” is sound. But by placing climate change at the heart of his decision making, he has upped the ante substantially. Is he aware of the risk or in danger of a rude awakening?
Eliot Wilson is a freelance writer on politics and international affairs and the co-founder of Pivot Point Group. He was senior official in the U.K. House of Commons from 2005 to 2016, including serving as a clerk of the Defence Committee and secretary of the U.K. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
Date: |
-
Financial Times - World
Why Europe needs a foreign economic policy
Current EU structures discourage joined-up thinking in pursuing geostrategic goals2 days ago -
The Hill - Politics
Congress must roll back a key anti-innovation Biden-Harris policy
It's imperative that we eliminate barriers to getting life-saving treatments to patients more quickly.3 days ago - Joe Biden -
ABC News - Top stories
Biden reflects on leaving 2024 race, mixed foreign policy legacy in last UNGA address
President Joe Biden, reflecting on his decision to step aside, told world leaders: "Some things are more important than staying in power. It's your people."3 hours ago - Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Harris leads on foreign policy nationally, but Trump has edge in swing states: Poll
Vice President Harris leads former President Trump nationally on the question of whether the presidential candidates would "pursue a foreign policy which benefits people like you," but trails him ...5 hours ago - Donald Trump -
Financial Times - World
Britain and Germany are failing differently
Two contrasting ways of running a country are now similarly unsuccessful3 days ago - United Kingdom -
Inc. - Business
3 Key Takeaways From the Fast Company Innovation Festival
They don't fit the business mold, but these leaders offer smart lessons in creativity, innovation, and power.Yesterday -
Inc. - Business
Ignition Schools: The 50 Top Colleges and Universities for Startups and Innovation
These institutions do more to nurture tomorrow's entrepreneurs and innovators than any others around the world.20 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
ESG pseudo-science gets brutally debunked
State laws requiring public funds to be invested with financial institutions focused on financial performance have debunked the myth that such laws increase costs, as other states without such laws ...24 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: House Democratic Party leadership hold hearing on Project 2025
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and other top Democrats are convening a hearing Tuesday to voice shared concerns about the conservative policy agenda known as Project 2025. Democrats ...24 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: Zelensky, world leaders address UN General Assembly
(3pm)24 minutes ago - United Nations -
The Hill - Politics
Top Dem says Speaker Johnson can’t be trusted to certify election results
The head of the House Democratic Caucus warned Tuesday that voters should have no faith in Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to certify this year’s presidential election results because of his role in ...27 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Nebraska governor: No plans for special session on winner-take-all electoral system
Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) said Tuesday that he would not be calling a special session for lawmakers to consider changing the state’s electoral system to winner-take-all after one key GOP ...37 minutes ago