Georgia Supreme Court halts reinstatement of new election rules while weighing appeal
Georgia's top court on Tuesday declined to let several controversial election rules go into effect while it weighs an appeal by national Republicans. The rules were passed in recent months by the State Election Board, then struck down by a lower court.
The Georgia Supreme Court decided unanimously that the rules will remain on hold as the court considers whether the State Election Board — an unelected panel of three Republicans, one Democrat and a nonpartisan chair — overstepped its authority.
The court also declined to hear the appeal on an expedited basis, effectively ensuring that no eleventh-hour rule changes will take effect before Election Day, an outcome feared by election officials who warned a last-minute implementation would cause chaos at the polls.
Last week, Fulton County Superior Judge Thomas Cox ruled that seven of the state board's new rules were “illegal, unconstitutional and void."
The rejected rules, challenged by the nonprofit Eternal Vigilance Action, founded by former Georgia state Rep. Scot Turner (R), included requirements that ballots be hand-counted on election night, that election workers undertake a "reasonable inquiry" before certifying and that election officials be given access to “all election related documentation created during the conduct of elections.”
“This is a victory for the Constitution and the principle of separation of powers,” Turner wrote in a post on the social platform X following Cox’s ruling. “Every conservative should see this as a win and significant pushback on an unelected board making law.”
But the Republican National Committee (RNC) rapidly appealed the decision, bypassing the state’s intermediate court and asking the Georgia Supreme Court to weigh in. RNC Chair Michael Whatley called Cox’s ruling “the very worst of judicial activism” in a statement announcing the appeal.
The state’s highest court agreed last week to hear the appeal, but Tuesday's ruling maintains the status quo while that process moves forward.
Georgia's State Election Board has faced several legal challenges over its new rules. Detractors claim the changes could slow down the certification process in favor of GOP candidates, while proponents say the new rules serve to better safeguard November's contests in the first big election since 2020, when unfounded claims of widespread fraud ran rampant.
The stakes are high, as Georgia remains one of seven states that could sway the outcome of the presidential election between former President Trump and Vice President Harris. Fundamental changes to how the state’s elections are run stand to undermine confidence in the state's results.
-
Georgia Supreme Court won't step in to reinstate controversial election rules
Top stories - CBS News - October 22 -
Supreme Court rejects Mark Meadows' appeal in Georgia election interference case
Top stories - NBC News - November 12 -
Appeals court rules 4 Trump co-defendants can’t move Georgia election charges to federal court
Politics - The Hill - October 24 -
How the Supreme Court has ruled on 2024 election-related cases
Top stories - CBS News - October 30 -
Supreme Court reinstates Youngkin’s voter purge order in Virginia
Politics - The Hill - October 30 -
Supreme Court rejects Mark Meadows's push to move Georgia election case to federal court
Politics - The Hill - November 12 -
Supreme Court rejects Meadows' bid to move Georgia election case to federal court
Top stories - CBS News - November 12
More from The Hill
-
Mika Brzezinski defends Trump meeting: 'I’ve been surprised at the backlash'
Politics - The Hill - 47 minutes ago -
Addressing America’s unfinished business in Afghanistan
Politics - The Hill - 48 minutes ago -
Bill Clinton: Democrats need to 'talk to people in ways that they can relate to'
Politics - The Hill - 53 minutes ago -
Whooping cough cases have quintupled. These states have it worst
Politics - The Hill - 1 hour ago -
Lawsuits target ‘potato cartel’ enabled by price data aggregators
Politics - The Hill - 1 hour ago