Executive orders pose risks to liberty and governance
The 2024 presidential election campaign between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump is the most policy-free in living history. The candidates and their supporters are trying to focus more on vibes, accentuating or minimizing controversies, and culturally signaling supporters to bring out the vote. But whoever wins will have enormous power to change policy, especially by issuing executive orders and other presidential directives.
Paul Begala, President Bill Clinton's former adviser, summed up the power of modern executive orders when he said, "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kind of cool." Excessive use of executive orders should chill supporters of the Constitution, limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. There is a proper role for executive orders, but it's too broad for our constitutional government.
American law does not define executive orders, presidents' most consequential means of unilaterally wielding power. In practice, they are written directives with the force of law that the president issues to set policies for the executive branch and to direct and manage how federal agencies, employees and department heads operate.
Executive orders are often innocuous. They can clarify laws, streamline cooperation between different federal agencies, and realize congressional objectives. President George Washington’s first executive order asked the heads of executive departments to describe their jobs and the current state of the union — a reasonable and constitutional order. Other times, executive orders can be formidable instruments of power. The most infamous such order in American history was President Roosevelt’s that forced the internment of Japanese Americans and lawful residents in camps during World War II.
The natural order in our republic has been for the scale and scope of presidential power to increase and for Congress' power to decrease. Presidential power has burgeoned over the course of American history and especially since the New Deal with significant assistance from other national emergencies like two world wars, the Cold War and the War on Terrorism. Presidents frequently take these powers for themselves, but too often Congress gives presidents their powers that they then exercise through executive orders.
And the courts will not save us. They rarely limit presidential authority — a noteworthy exception being the Youngstown decision that stopped President Truman from nationalizing steel firms during the Korean War. Courts struck down only 14 executive orders through the end of the 20th century and few since, if any — in any event, a minuscule small share of the more than 14,000 issued since the government started counting.
A pessimistic projection is that the president will become increasingly powerful as Congress withers and the courts are the last remaining check on executive authority — courts staffed with judges appointed by presidents. This lamentable trend must reverse, and the presidency should be placed back into its properly proportioned box, but preparing for the growth of the imperial presidency is the most prudent action.
In that vein, I edited a “Cato Handbook on Executive Orders and Presidential Directives” to highlight several particularly damaging executive orders and other directives that conflict with the principles of individual liberty, free markets, limited government, peace and the Constitution. The purpose is to help a new administration identify which orders should be revoked or amended. Doing so would reduce the harm and increase the scope of liberty in policy areas like health care, immigration, foreign policy, trade, defense and others.
There are plenty of executive order suggestions in our handbook for the next administration to like, regardless of whether Harris or Trump is elected. For instance, Harris would like some of our recommendations on revoking immigration orders, and Trump would appreciate the guidance on revoking the energy or administrative state orders we identify. There will also be plenty of recommendations that both major party candidates will dislike. No matter the outcome of the 2024 election, the next administration could take some of Cato’s recommendations to reduce the harm.
The Cato handbook is not a comprehensive list of executive orders and directives that should be revoked. There are so many that such a list would be impossible to compile, but the handbook is merely the lowest hanging fruit and best places to begin the long journey back toward constitutionally limited government. That low-hanging fruit is ripe indeed.
Alex Nowrasteh is the vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute.
Date: |
Topics
-
World - Yahoo News
YouTuber and Rwandan government critic jailed
Yesterday -
Business - CNBC
Why the U.S. government is investigating Google
A series of complaints say Google's dominant behavior in the online search, advertising, and web applications markets is violating antitrust laws.8 hours ago - Google -
Sports - ESPN
Breaking down the WNBA Finals: Is this the year the Liberty win it all?
Minnesota dominated New York in the regular season. Can they do it again in the WNBA Finals? Will the weight of a first title overwhelm the Liberty?5 hours ago - WNBA -
Sports - The New York Times
Meet the Team Standing in the Way of a New York Liberty Championship
A Minnesota Lynx team that was picked to finish ninth in the W.N.B.A. standings will take on a Liberty team that was built to win titles.21 hours ago - New York -
World - The Guardian
WNBA finals 2024 predictions: will Collier and the Lynx stop the Liberty powerhouse?
Our writers give their verdicts as Minnesota aim for their fifth title against a star-packed New York team hunting their first. The Lynx are here because .... There’s not a problem that ...10 hours ago - WNBA -
Business - The Wall Street Journal
London-Listed Companies Given More Freedom to Boost Top Executives Wages
The Investment Association simplified its principles of remuneration after a review aimed at ensuring that the U.K. markets continue to attract high-quality companies.Yesterday -
Sports - The New York Times
Why N.F.L. Executives Think the Jets Fired Robert Saleh Too Soon
Executives who spoke with The Athletic about Saleh’s firing blamed team owner Woody Johnson for making a rash decision.21 hours ago - NFL -
Business - Financial Times
Former Pfizer executives pull out of activist investor Starboard’s campaign
Hedge fund had enlisted help from ex-chair Ian Read and former finance chief Frank D’Amelio14 hours ago -
Top stories - ABC News
Supreme Court could give Oklahoma murderer another shot at avoiding execution
The Supreme Court appears likely to give Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip another shot in court at overturning his conviction for lack of a fair trial.19 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
FCC chair rebukes Trump calls to revoke CBS, ABC broadcast license
The chairwoman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is forcefully pushing back on calls from former President Trump to punish broadcast networks that he says are not fair to him. “While ...16 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Harris should promise to elevate FEMA head to Cabinet
FEMA's lack of resources has become a critical point of discussion, and the next president should take a hard look at this by proposing the merging of FEMA and NOAA into an independent ...18 minutes ago - Kamala Harris -
Politics - The Hill
What officials are saying in aftermath of Hurricane Milton
Floridians awoke Thursday morning with the worst of Hurricane Milton largely behind them, but a long road to recovery still ahead. Hurricane Milton made landfall Wednesday evening as a Category 3 ...32 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Live updates: At least 4 dead, millions without power in aftermath of Hurricane Milton
Hurricane Milton made landfall as a Category 3 storm along Florida's Gulf Coast, bringing powerful winds, a deadly storm surge, flooding, widespread power outages, and deaths.41 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
A path toward a nuclear off-ramp with Iran
The U.S. aim should be both to tame Iran's nuclear ambitions and arrest the prospects of further conflict escalation in the region.48 minutes ago - Iran