Elena Kagan keeps pressing for ethics code enforcement at Supreme Court
NEW YORK — Justice Elena Kagan is keeping up her public drive for an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court’s ethics code despite strident criticism from some voices on the right and skepticism about it among some legal ethics scholars.
“It seems like a good idea in terms of ensuring that we comply with our own code of conduct going forward in the future. It seems like a good idea in terms of ensuring that people have confidence that we're doing exactly that,” Kagan said during an appearance Monday at New York University School of Law. “So, it seems like a salutary thing for the court.”
Kagan effusively praised the ethics code the high court adopted last November under intense pressure from Democratic lawmakers that followed a series of press reports about undisclosed gifts to some of her colleagues and behind-the-scenes efforts to influence the justices.
“I think it’s a good ethics code,” Kagan said, adding that some departures from rules for lower-court judges were justified by the Supreme Court’s unique role atop the judicial branch.
However, Kagan also defended her call — first issued at a judicial conference in California in July — for an external enforcement mechanism that could be overseen by retired or highly experienced judges. She scoffed at the notion that such a panel would be too deferential to the justices.
“Judges … they're not so afraid of us,” Kagan said. “I think that that's in the picking, basically. And I think that there are plenty of judges around this country who could do a task like that in a very fair minded and serious way.”
The Obama appointee also said she did not think such a mechanism would produce a flurry of frivolous allegations against the justices. The panel charged with enforcement could sort out meritless allegations, she said.
Kagan did not say whether her colleagues have privately discussed an enforcement regime or where they stand on it, although Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said in a recent interview that she was open to it.
Kagan also declined to address a report in ProPublica that the the head of a conservative group that regularly brings cases to the high court, Kelly Shackelford of the First Liberty Institute, described earlier comments by Kagan on the subject as “somewhat treasonous.”
Kagan joked that the description sounded akin to being “somewhat pregnant,” but wouldn’t address it directly. “I don’t want to dignify it any further,” she said.
Shackelford wrote to Kagan Monday apologizing for the comment, First Liberty spokesperson Hiram Sasser said. “Kelly sent a letter saying he should not have assumed she was inviting other branches to control the court and he should not have used that word,” Sasser said.
Even as Kagan leaned into her call for the justices to adopt an enforcement mechanism, she did not repeat a suggestion she made last year that Congress’ power to dictate ethics rules for the court was well established.
“Can Congress do various things to regulate the Supreme Court? I think the answer is: yes,” she told a judicial conference in Oregon last summer. Her comment was a riposte to Justice Samuel Alito, who has said the Constitution didn’t give Congress power to dictate the court’s ethics processes.
On Monday, Kagan said she was steering clear of commenting on Congress’ power. “I don't want to say anything about that because, you know, one day, who knows, I might have to decide a case involving that,” she said.
Kagan didn’t explain or acknowledge the shift, but in July President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris — who is the Democratic presidential nominee — endorsed the notion of a law imposing an externally-enforced ethics code for the high court, as well as term limits for justices.
During an hourlong on-stage interview at a luncheon for a women’s legal leadership center, NYU Professor Melissa Murray asked Kagan about future consequences of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning the federal constitutional right to abortion. Justice Clarence Thomas suggested at the time that precedents guaranteeing rights to contraception and same-sex marriage might also someday be overturned under the same legal rationale.
“This analysis that you've just applied to abortion … it applies to a lot of other things,” said Kagan, who dissented from the court’s far-reaching abortion ruling two years ago. “Just as a matter of logic, that point is true,” the justice added, although she stopped short of saying whether she thought the high court would move toward repealing those other rights anytime soon, or ever.
Kagan also shared some details about the justices’ private pastimes, including that one topic of behind-the-scenes chatter at the court is golf. “Justice Kavanaugh is a good golfer and the chief justice is a good golfer,” Kagan said, adding that Chief Justice John Roberts’ wife, Jane Roberts, is “very good, too.”
Kagan said the shared interest in golf contributes to the court’s camaraderie, but should only matter to the public if it leads the justices to more give-and-take with their colleagues about the court’s official business. On that score, she was more opaque, saying: “The proof is in the pudding, right?”
Date: |
-
BBC News - Top stories
Chiles appeals to Supreme Court over Olympic bronze
Gymnast Jordan Chiles appeals to the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland in an attempt to be awarded an Olympic bronze medal.8 minutes ago - Olympics -
CBS News - Top stories
Jordan Chiles takes bid to reclaim Olympic bronze to Swiss Supreme Court
American gymnast Jordan Chiles is asking Switzerland's Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by the Court of Arbitration for Sport that stripped her of a bronze medal at the 2024 Olympics.5 hours ago - Olympics -
Politico - Politics
Democrats press oil executives on Trump's $1B ask
6 days ago - Donald Trump -
ABC News - World
Dedicated artists are keeping Japan's ancient craft of temari alive
Time seems to stop at Eiko Araki's studio in Japan4 minutes ago - Japan -
ESPN - Sports
Chiles takes bid for bronze medal to Swiss court
American gymnast Jordan Chiles is asking Switzerland's Supreme Court to overturn a ruling that stripped her of a bronze medal in the floor exercise.1 hour ago -
CBS News - Top stories
TikTok in court over U.S. ban: Breaking down the legal arguments
TikTok faced a key court hearing Monday in its lawsuit to block a law that could ban the social media app in the U.S. early next year. CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford is in ...5 hours ago - Tiktok -
The Hill - Politics
Jordan Chiles appeals Olympic medal decision in Swiss court
Jordan Chiles, the gymnast who had her bronze medal stripped from her moments after the 2024 Paris Olympics concluded, is fighting the decision in Switzerland's Supreme Court. "Jordan Chiles' ...7 hours ago - Olympics -
NBC News - Top stories
Judge denies Mark Meadows' effort to move 2020 election case in Arizona to federal court
A federal judge said that Trump’s former White House chief of staff missed a deadline to file the request to move his state-level case.4 hours ago -
ABC News - Top stories
Judge denies Meadows' request to move Arizona 'fake elector' case to federal court
A judge has denied former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows' request to have the Arizona "fake elector" case against him moved to federal court from state court.5 hours ago -
Yahoo Sports - Sports
Jordan Chiles files appeal with Swiss court in attempt to reclaim Olympic bronze medal
Jordan Chiles’ bronze medal win at the Paris Olympics was overturned and instead awarded to Romania’s Ana Bǎrbosu.2 hours ago - Olympics
More from Politico
-
Politico - Politics
‘The most complex, dynamic and dangerous threat environment I’ve experienced’
The second apparent assassination attempt of Donald Trump is the latest peril in a race that has been defined by anger and threats.10 hours ago -
Politico - Politics
House lawmakers demand Secret Service briefing on 2nd Trump assassination attempt
The top lawmakers on the panel investigating the July shooting requested a briefing with the Secret Service this week over what authorities said was another “attempted assassination.”Yesterday - Donald Trump -
Politico - Politics
Will Johnson’s stopgap funding plan make it to the floor?
5 days ago -
Politico - Politics
Democrats press oil executives on Trump's $1B ask
6 days ago - Donald Trump -
Politico - Politics
House Republicans set to gather as six-month funding patch roadblocks grow
6 days ago - Republican Party