DOJ asks court to reject TikTok bid to block ban
The Department of Justice (DOJ) asked a federal appeals court Wednesday to reject TikTok’s bid to put a law that could ban the app on hold while it appeals to the Supreme Court.
The law, which requires TikTok’s parent company ByteDance to divest from the app or face a ban on Jan. 19, was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit last week.
The DOJ argued that TikTok simply rehashed claims that the appeals court has already rejected, and failed to show why it should block the law from going into effect as Congress intended.
It also emphasized that the two sides agreed to a schedule that would allow time for TikTok to make a similar request to the Supreme Court.
“Petitioners are entitled to ask the Supreme Court to enjoin the law’s application pending that Court’s review, and they expressly reserved their right to do so and set a schedule that would allow time for it,” the government wrote.
“They are not entitled, however, to an injunction against an Act of Congress when the only court to consider their constitutional challenge has rejected it,” it continued. “The Supreme Court can decide for itself whether the statute must be enjoined.”
A three-judge panel with the D.C. Circuit ruled against TikTok last Friday, finding that the law does not violate the First Amendment.
TikTok asked the court Monday to put the law on hold while it appeals to the Supreme Court, arguing that the law would shut down the app for its 170 million U.S. users on the “eve of a presidential inauguration.”
“Before that happens, the Supreme Court should have an opportunity, as the only court with appellate jurisdiction over this action, to decide whether to review this exceptionally important case,” TikTok wrote.
The divest-or-ban law moved rapidly through Congress earlier this year, passing both chambers with large bipartisan majorities. It was signed into law by President Biden in April.
However, it remains to be seen what President-elect Trump may do when he takes office next month. During the campaign, Trump opposed the law, arguing that it would benefit large platforms like Facebook, and vowed to “save TikTok.”
In an interview over the weekend, though, the president-elect appeared noncommittal about taking steps to protect the app.
“I’m going to try and make it so that other companies don’t become an even bigger monopoly,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
Topics
-
The Onion's Bid for Infowars Rejected in Bankruptcy Court
A judge ruled that the trustee charged with auctioning off the assets of Infowars’ parent company didn’t maximize value for creditors.The Wall Street Journal - 1d -
TikTok Asks Court to Temporarily Pause Ban As It Looks to Supreme Court or Trump to Weigh In
The company is requesting a pause on a law that requires the app to be sold or face a ban in the United States by mid-January, aiming to buy time for the Supreme Court or the incoming Trump ...The New York Times - 2d -
TikTok asks federal appeals court to bar enforcement of ban until SCOTUS review
TikTok on Monday asked a federal appeals court to bar the Biden administration from enforcing a law that could lead to a ban on the popular platform until the Supreme Court reviews the caseABC News - 3d -
TikTok asks for emergency pause to looming US ban
The app says the Supreme Court - and incoming Trump administration - needs more time to consider the case.BBC News - 3d -
TikTok asks court to put divest-or-ban law on hold amid Supreme Court appeal
TikTok asked a federal appeals court Monday to put on hold a law that could potentially ban the popular social media app next month as it prepares to appeal to the Supreme Court. TikTok and ...The Hill - 3d -
Appeals Court Upholds U.S. Ban of TikTok
A three-judge panel ruled Congress has the power to shut down the Chinese-backed app in the U.S. because of national security concerns.The Wall Street Journal - 5d -
TikTok Faces U.S. Ban After Appeals Court Denies Bid to Overturn New Law
The law will ban the video app in the United States by Jan. 19 if its owner, ByteDance, does not sell it to a non-Chinese company.The New York Times - 5d -
Appeals court upholds TikTok ban, declining to block law that would force sale
An appeals court judge wrote that the law that would force a sale or ban of TikTok "survive[s] constitutional scrutiny."CBS News - 6d -
Appeals court upholds TikTok ban law
A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a law requiring TikTok’s Chinese parent company to sell the popular app or face a U.S. ban. A three-judge panel with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. ...The Hill - 6d
More from The Hill
-
As FBI probe continues, 'drones are not going away': Wharton
The Hill - 13m -
Amazon launches vehicle sales in 48 cities for specific make, models
The Hill - 14m -
Luigi Mangione's fellow inmates: Free him, 'conditions suck'
The Hill - 15m -
Coffee prices hit record high after challenging growing season
The Hill - 15m -
12:30 Report — Trump’s opening bell victory lap
The Hill - 21m