Zombie anti-abortion laws are menacing American women
The Arizona Supreme Court issued a shocking ruling last week that revived a moribund state law from 1864 that banned abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother. That statute, which carries up to five years in prison for violations by both doctors and patients, is now the law of the land in Arizona.
Especially stunning is that the court simultaneously invalidated a 2022 law that protected abortion access in Arizona until 15 weeks of pregnancy (or earlier in the event of a medical emergency).
Yet the 4-2 Arizona Supreme Court majority can hardly be blamed for picking the old law over the new one — it was merely following the directives laid out by the U.S. Supreme Court. The manner in which Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization killed Roe v. Wade means that, when it comes to abortion, the law — along with the tens of millions of American women and girls who are capable of becoming pregnant — will continue to be hijacked back to a time where women had few, if any, meaningful rights.
The irony here is twofold. The first is that the Texas law originally struck down in Roe banned abortions except to save the life of the mother. What Roe deemed unconstitutional is now the law again, this time in Arizona.
The second irony is that the Dobbs majority, in an opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito, specifically ruled that “we … return the power” over how abortion may be regulated by the states "to the people and their elected representatives.” “Our decision returns the issue of abortion to those legislative bodies,” he further explained, “and it allows women on both sides of the abortion issue to seek to affect the legislative process by influencing public opinion, lobbying legislators, voting, and running for office. Women are not without electoral or political power.”
But here’s the thing: In 1864, not only was slavery still legal in many parts of America, but women could not vote anywhere, including in Arizona — which was not even a state yet. Women could not legally vote until the 19th Amendment gave them that right in 1920. They could — and did — vote in 2022, yet those votes were rendered meaningless by the Arizona decision, which nullified them in favor of those cast by a class of white men 160 years prior. Back then, those were the only people eligible to resolve “the basic legality of pre-viability abortions for all 330 Americans” through “their representatives in the democratic process in the States or Congress,” to borrow from Justice Brett Kavanaugh in his concurring Dobbs opinion.
The Arizona Supreme Court said it preferred the old law to the new one because of Dobbs: “In June 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe, thereby eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion and returning ‘the authority to regulate abortion … to the people and their elected representatives.’” Because Dobbs intervened, the court essentially reasoned, the newer law from 2022 is now obsolete.
The Arizona court followed Dobbs’s lead in other ways. In that case, the Supreme Court majority unveiled a revised test for determining whether fundamental rights that are not specifically enumerated in the Constitution nonetheless exist: history and tradition. Because “abortion was criminal in at least some stages of pregnancy and was regarded as unlawful” around the time the 14th Amendment was ratified, Alito reasoned, under the history-and-tradition test, it enjoys no constitutional protection against government control now.
Inexplicably, Alito traveled as far back as 13th-century England to dispel the existence of abortion rights, citing a legal treatise by the English judge Henry de Bracton, who died in 1268. That’s 600 years before the 14th Amendment — which Roe v. Wade interpreted to protect a woman’s right to decide for herself without governmental coercion or punishment whether and when to have children — was even ratified. Against that backdrop, the Arizona Supreme Court’s focus on a law enacted shortly before the post–Civil War amendments, which included the 14th, seems downright modern.
But there’s more. The primary flaw in Alito’s reasoning was his utter disregard for the interests of women in the face of governmental intervention in family planning decisions. A rights-based legal question under the 14th Amendment’s Due Process or Equal Protection clauses typically identifies both sides of a scale — the individual’s interest on one side, and the government’s regulatory interest on the other — and then balances them. Roe and the cases that came after it gave weight to the woman’s side of things. Alito ignored that altogether, introducing in its place the interests of “fetal life,” which the Mississippi law that Dobbs upheld called an “unborn human being.”
Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan, stated that the court “says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of.” By taking women back to a time when they had no rights to speak of, the Arizona Supreme Court conformed to this aspect of the Dobbs decision, too.
Never mind that the very text of the 14th Amendment belies the notion that unborn humans are protected under the Constitution, which the Roe court rejected outright. The 14th Amendment reads: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Even if an unborn fetus is a “person,” a so-called textualist or strict constructionist of the Constitution cannot honestly deny that a woman qualifies. Because of six conservative justices, that no longer is the case.
Kimberly Wehle is author of “How to Read the Constitution — and Why.” Her forthcoming book, “Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works — and Why,” is out in September. Follow her @kimwehle.
Date: | |
Tag: | Abortion |
Filter
-
The Supreme Court struggled with the consequences of its 2022 decision ending the nationwide right to abortion in a case pitting the health of women suffering medical emergencies against a state law that bans the procedure.
The Supreme Court struggled with the consequences of its 2022 decision ending the nationwide right to abortion in a case pitting the health of women suffering medical emergencies against a state law that bans the procedure.The Wall Street Journal - World -
How ‘History and Tradition’ Rulings Are Changing American Law
A new legal standard is gaining traction among conservative judges — one that might turn back the clock on drag shows, gun restrictions and more.The New York Times - Top stories -
Australians call for stricter laws on violence against women after killings
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the issue was a national crisis.BBC News - Top stories -
New gun laws in Turks and Caicos lead to arrest of American tourist
A warning for Americans traveling to the Caribbean: The territory of Turks and Caicos has enacted strict new laws, with a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 12 years for carrying guns or ammunition. Ryan Watson from Oklahoma is behind bars there ...CBS News - World -
Passage of harsh anti-LGBTQ+ law in Iraq draws diplomatic backlash
Human rights groups and diplomat have criticized a law that was quietly passed by the Iraqi parliament over the weekend that would impose heavy prison sentences on gay and transgender peopleABC News - World -
Human rights groups and diplomats condemn Iraq’s anti-LGBTQ+ law
US state department says law could drive away foreign investment and David Cameron calls it ‘dangerous and worrying’. Human rights groups and diplomats have criticised a law passed by the Iraqi parliament over the weekend that would impose heavy ...The Guardian - World -
Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
The almost-complete ban on abortions in the state could go into effect as soon as June 8 if the State Legislature does not repeal it, the state’s attorney general said.The New York Times - Top stories - Abortion -
Effort to repeal Arizona abortion law heads to state Senate
Arizona lawmakers moved forward Wednesday in their efforts to repeal a Civil War-era law that bans all abortions except to save the woman's life. CBS News campaign reporter Shawna Mizelle has the details.CBS News - Top stories - Abortion -
What's EMTALA, the patient protection law at the center of Supreme Court abortion arguments?
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a case that could determine whether doctors can provide abortions to pregnant women with medical emergencies in states that enact abortion bansABC News - Health - Abortion -
Oklahoma prosecutors charge fifth member of anti-government group in Kansas women’s killings
Oklahoma prosecutors charged a fifth member of an anti-government group on Wednesday with killing and kidnapping two Kansas women.NBC News - Top stories
More from The Hill
-
Riot police drag away protesters at University of Texas as Gaza tensions flare
State troopers in riot gear moved on Monday afternoon to clear out students attempting to occupy a quad at the University of Texas at Austin. Dozens of protesters were arrested on site, escalating tensions that began on Wednesday when the ...The Hill - Politics -
Jill Stein accuses police of assaulting her at protest
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on Sunday alleged police assaulted her and other demonstrators shortly before being arrested at a pro-Palestinian protest on the campus of Washington University in St. Louis. “Basically, the police ...The Hill - Politics -
US finds Israeli military units violated human rights
Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story US finds Israeli military units violated human rights The State Department has determined that at least five Israeli ...The Hill - Politics - Israel -
Evening Report — Protests continue to spread on college campuses
A quick recap of the day and what to look forward to tomorrow {beacon} Evening Report © AP Pro-Palestinian protests escalate on college campuses Hundreds of students have been arrested on college campuses across the country as ...The Hill - Politics -
FCC fines wireless carriers
Presented by Microsoft — {beacon} Technology Technology PRESENTED BY The Big Story FCC fines major mobile carriers $200M The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a fine totaling $200 million to the nation’s four largest mobile ...The Hill - Politics