With Assad out of the way, will Iran choose realpolitik?
During World War II, the butler of the British ambassador to Turkey was spying on the Allies. As a butler, he had access to the ambassador’s files and was able to uncover and copy top-secret information, including the Allies’ plans for D-Day. Fortunately, the Germans considered him unreliable and disregarded the information.
We may not realize it at the moment, but sometimes a singular incident can have far-reaching effects, setting off a sequence of events no one could have foreseen.
The atrocities carried out at the hands of Iran’s proxy Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, have proved just such a moment, with ramifications extending well beyond the slaughter and torture of women and children in Israel.
As Israel continues to dismantle Hamas, it has also significantly diminished the effectiveness of another of Iran's proxies, Hezbollah, closing Lebanon’s border with Syria.
With Hezbollah destabilized, an opportunity presented itself in Syria. A former al Qaeda affiliate, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, seized the moment (along with other rebel groups) for a long-awaited assault on Assad — securing the fall of the Assad regime within 10 days.
The rebels are now in full control of Syria, and with Assad’s “humanitarian” asylum in Russia, Iran’s complex of regional proxies is substantially reduced.
Like dominoes striking each other — Hamas, Hezbollah and finally Syria — regional ambitions of Iranian influence have been severely undermined.
Iran is at a crossroads. It can either embrace “realpolitik” through practical, realistic negotiations with the West, or it can “roll the dice” in its quest to become a nuclear power.
United Nations Chief Nuclear Inspector Rafael Grossi recently reiterated his concern: Iran was increasing its stores of purified uranium and was perilously close to a concentration required for nuclear weapons.
Around the same time, Iran's former nuclear negotiator, Mohammad Javad Zarif, called for discussions to resume regarding the country’s nuclear program. Ostensibly, Iran’s new “open-minded” president, Masoud Pezeshkian, seeks to “engage constructively with the West.”
Iran’s vistas, via its no longer substantial “axis of resistance,” are at best severely compromised. Will it choose the more plausible path of “realpolitik” or tempt fate in the face of an emboldened Netanyahu and Trump?
Iran has pursued a less extreme foreign policy with the West before, during the presidency of Ali Rafsanjani — exhibiting a more cordial demeanor. A similar policy could conceivably bear fruit again with Pezeshkian.
The question before us is twofold — will Iran choose wisely? And will Trump give “realpolitik” a chance to “bear fruit,” if Iran so chooses?
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Trump's designee for secretary of State, has been quite vocal about his estimate of the dangers of Iran. Sensing Iran’s weakness, it is possible (via influence from his advisors) that President-elect Trump will accept nothing less than a complete withdrawal from its nuclear program.
It is hoped that cooler and more rational heads prevail in the administration, since much of what drives Iran’s leadership (religious and otherwise) is respect from the West and acceptance by the Arab League. Thus, Iran’s leaders are not keen to abandon that upon which the country has staked so much of its effort for respect and power — its nuclear program.
Yet there remains the possibility (and hope) that Iran will employ a more plausible approach in its discourse with the West — conceivably retaining its nuclear program for domestic use only. This will allow Iran to save face.
Today, Middle East experts agree that China, not Iran, poses the top threat to Washington. Iranians mobilized in numbers for democracy in reaction to the 2009 presidential election. And although history is not a sufficient predicate for defending national interests, let us not forget that, according to declassified CIA documents, it was the U.S. and Britain who denied Iran democracy once before — through a CIA/MI6-engineered coup.
In the absence of Assad, there is little reason for Iran to pursue an alternative (and potentially counterproductive) political “nuclear” agenda.
Given Israel’s superior nuclear and conventional military capability, and the anticipated arrival of President-elect Trump, “realpolitik” is Iran’s best option — one of realistic expectations and transparency regarding its nuclear designs.
If Israel senses that Iran is opting for a nuclear agenda, it will not hesitate (with or without U.S. acquiescence) to eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities. (This plan has already been rehearsed for immediate implementation.)
What's more, Iran is well aware of Israel’s concerns and capabilities, should it forego a “realpolitik” (more pragmatic) solution to its political dilemma.
With the right diplomatic overtures from the Trump administration, Iran can be brought into the orbit of constructive bilateral relations with the West.
Several conditions are key to allow Iran and the U.S. to achieve a sustainable nuclear agreement while allowing each to claim credit for success.
The Trump administration should reopen talks with Iran via direct negotiations with Pezeshkian — implementing the “Non-Proliferation Treaty” — to include verification of Iran's nuclear program. Iran (as compensation) must receive sanctions relief. As a consequence of this achievement, the Persian Gulf countries should establish a nuclear-free zone in the region as a first step toward collective security.
The U.S. should conclude the effort through further negotiations to foster a comprehensive agreement between the countries of the region to establish (via treaty) an integrated mechanism towards mutual security and collaborative cooperation.
Trump’s administration faces an opportunity for immense possibilities — and yet, great peril. Now is not the time for personalities; instead, it should pursue what is in America’s “long-term” interest: a foreign policy conducive to American strategic leadership, articulated through wise (not personal or convenient) use of economic and political hegemony — one in which a military solution must always remain an option but not necessarily the default option.
F. Andrew Wolf Jr. is the director of The Fulcrum Institute, an organization of current and former scholars in the humanities, arts and sciences.
Topics
-
Syria's Alawites, Sect of the Assads, Fear for Their Future
They say disparate violent incidents in the past two months—including alleged extrajudicial killings and the destruction of a religious shrine—are beginning to resemble a pattern of anti-Alawite acts.The Wall Street Journal - 7h -
A Trump playbook for ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran
At this late hour, the United States cannot afford more diplomacy on Tehran’s terms.The Hill - 1d -
Cohere co-founder sees big AI opportunity in enterprise, happy to stay out of ChatGPT's way
Cohere on Thursday debuted its early access program for its AI agent platform called North, as it deepens its focus on the enterprise.CNBC - 2d -
I chose to be childfree. I didn’t think I was choosing isolation, too
I’ll never stop trying, but parents and childfree people both have to work hard to maintain a community. We’d been riding our mountain bikes and chatting for a solid half-hour when my friend ...The Guardian - 3d -
With Stakes High, Lebanese Lawmakers to Try Again to Choose a President
Despite pressure by the United States and others to elect a president in order to receive financial support, a consensus candidate has yet to emerge who can clearly end Lebanon’s political gridlock.The New York Times - 3d -
With Trudeau on the way out, can Canadians get their free speech back?
Trudeau has been the cheerful face of modern censorship.The Hill - 5d -
I was lost in the cesspit of social media. Then Jane Austen showed me the way out
Why spend every evening fighting trolls on X when you could be working your way through the greats of literature? No more online rage, recriminations, doom-scrolling …. For about as long as I’ve ...The Guardian - 6d -
Assad’s fall is an opportunity for a US win over China
Trump may believe that Syria is “not our fight,” but the competition with China is very much ours and will undoubtedly be a focus of his administration.The Hill - 6d -
Biden is trying to weaponize the Clean Air Act on his way out of the White House
President Biden’s Department of Justice filed an unusual brief in Sunoco v. Honolulu.The Hill - Jan. 4
More from The Hill
-
Stavridis says Trump’s plan for Greenland ‘not a crazy idea’
James Stavridis, former NATO supreme allied commander, said he doesn’t think President-elect Trump’s comments about Greenland are “crazy." “It’s not a crazy idea.… We could do an awful lot in terms ...The Hill - 37m -
With federal gun control on ice, advocates look to other solutions for school shootings
Advocates are urging greater action against school shootings in 2025, saying the only way to slow the bloodshed is a combination of moves from legislators, schools and parents. Multiple trackers ...The Hill - 1h -
Trump's talk of expansion puts world leaders on alert
President-elect Trump’s talk of territorial expansion has rattled world leaders at an already precarious time in global politics. Trump doubled down last week on his suggestions that the U.S. buy ...The Hill - 1h -
GOP rep suggests California relief aid should be withheld over state policies
Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) said he believes Congress should withhold disaster relief funds from California in the wake of Los Angeles wildfires until environmental policy changes are made by the ...The Hill - 9h -
LA County supervisor pens letter to Trump asking him to visit wildfire damage
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Chair urged President-elect Trump to visit the burning region in a Friday letter to the incoming leader. “I've sent a letter to President-Elect ...The Hill - 9h
More in Politics
-
Stavridis says Trump’s plan for Greenland ‘not a crazy idea’
James Stavridis, former NATO supreme allied commander, said he doesn’t think President-elect Trump’s comments about Greenland are “crazy." “It’s not a crazy idea.… We could do an awful lot in terms ...The Hill - 37m -
With federal gun control on ice, advocates look to other solutions for school shootings
Advocates are urging greater action against school shootings in 2025, saying the only way to slow the bloodshed is a combination of moves from legislators, schools and parents. Multiple trackers ...The Hill - 1h -
Trump's talk of expansion puts world leaders on alert
President-elect Trump’s talk of territorial expansion has rattled world leaders at an already precarious time in global politics. Trump doubled down last week on his suggestions that the U.S. buy ...The Hill - 1h -
GOP rep suggests California relief aid should be withheld over state policies
Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) said he believes Congress should withhold disaster relief funds from California in the wake of Los Angeles wildfires until environmental policy changes are made by the ...The Hill - 9h -
LA County supervisor pens letter to Trump asking him to visit wildfire damage
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Chair urged President-elect Trump to visit the burning region in a Friday letter to the incoming leader. “I've sent a letter to President-Elect ...The Hill - 9h