Why it’s impossible for Trump to get a fair jury
A convenient way to define bias in a juror is to ask, “Do you have a personal motivation to convict or acquit the defendant?” Jurors who have an actual interest in the outcome of a trial are, by law, required to be struck from a jury pool. Legally, this isn’t a high bar. Any personal interest in the outcome of the case is disqualifying.
This is precisely why — no matter how many hundreds of prospective jurors are questioned, what news sources they read, where they live, where they work or how many times they promise to be fair — Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, cannot get a fair jury.
It is preposterous to suggest that any American citizen called as a prospective juror could be “unbiased” when it comes to Trump — the presidential leading candidate, according to polls — mere months away from the election. It is indisputable that the lives of all Americans will be affected by whoever is elected as the next president. According to the polling, if Trump were convicted in the Manhattan hush money case, his chances of winning the election would go down.
The acquittal or conviction of Trump in this trial will directly affect his electoral chances in the upcoming election. Democrats feign shock at the suggestion that the prosecution is politically motivated, suggesting instead that this case is a vital prosecution to demonstrate that “nobody is above the law.” But they’re just playing coy. The case — which has been repeatedly passed over by the FEC, federal prosecutors and even the Manhattan DA’s office itself — has almost nothing to do with enforcing the law. Based on the indictment alone, it’s not even clear what law Trump allegedly violated. Yet Democrats suddenly care so much about a decade-old misdemeanor? It doesn’t take much to do the math on that one.
Judge Juan Merchan issued a memorandum in advance of jury selection outlining 42 questions that the attorneys were authorized to ask prospective jurors. His intent, it seems, was to limit inquiry into the explicit political preferences of the jurors and their past voting history. The questionnaire, though, in its attempt to strategically excise “politics,” blatantly prohibits the only question that matters at all — who do you want to be our next president? Only three meaningful answers exist: Trump, Biden or “I don’t care.” Each answer presents an inextricable bias that no amount of promises to be fair and impartial can override.
One’s first instinct might be to suggest that the court should seat only those jurors who don’t care who is elected as the next president. But this, too, would result in an unconstitutional jury. By seating only those who have no opinion, you disenfranchise the involvement of all those reasonable people who do care about national politics — no longer a jury of one’s peers but a jury of the outliers.
Then there’s those who do have a preference. By definition they are biased, because they have a direct and tangible interest in the outcome of the case, knowing that their verdict will sway the election for or against their candidate of choice.
We are, in fact, in the throes of a logical conundrum. All the prospective jurors are American citizens living in America. Of course they have an opinion as to the direction the country is taken. Their lives will undoubtedly be affected by the next presidential election — yet we’re to believe there are jurors who can both care about this country’s future and simultaneously set such concerns aside as they determine the guilt or innocence of Donald Trump?
To hold this trial in the lead up to a presidential election is, by definition, election interference. The outcome will affect the election and the jurors deciding the case — whether they admit it or not — have an interest in its outcome, one way or the other, that is unconnected to the evidence presented in court.
Andrew Cherkasky (@CherkaskyLaw) and Katie Cherkasky (@CherkaskyKatie) are both military veterans, former federal prosecutors and current criminal defense attorneys. As co-owners of the civil rights law firm Golden Law Inc., they focus their legal practice on federal felony trial defense and appellate representation and other civil rights-related issues.
Date: | |
Tag: | Donald Trump |
Topics
Filter
-
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump trial: ‘Why is this not on TV?’
Late-night hosts discuss Donald Trump’s court naps, police crackdowns on peaceful pro-Palestinian student protesters and Kristi Noem’s VP chances. Late-night hosts talked about Donald Trump’s $9,000 gag order penalty, his falling asleep during the ...The Guardian - World - Donald Trump -
Why you should get a home equity loan with interest rates on hold
With high interest rates on hold, it may be time to consider a home equity loan. Here's why.CBS News - Top stories -
Donald Trump is $1.8 billion richer after getting DJT stock bonus
Trump's ownership stake in Trump Media & Technology group now stands at $5.7 billion, buoyed by a rise in the stock's price.CBS News - Top stories - Donald Trump -
Why the 12th Amendment could prevent a Trump-Rubio ticket
Advisers for former President Donald Trump say a name consistently coming up as his potential running mate is Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. However, if Rubio ultimately isn't Trump's pick for vice president, it might not be because of what he ...CBS News - Top stories - Donald Trump -
Trump gets jail warning for violating hush money trial gag order; Stormy Daniels ex-lawyer testifies
The criminal hush money trial of former President Donald Trump resumed in Manhattan Supreme Court for the second week of witness testimony.CNBC - Business - Donald Trump -
Trump threatens to prosecute Bidens if he’s re-elected unless he gets immunity
Time magazine called the ex-president’s plans ‘an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world’. Donald Trump has warned that Joe Biden and his family could face multiple criminal prosecutions once he leaves office ...The Guardian - World - Donald Trump -
Trump campaign lawyers' bid to withdraw from discrimination case gets closed-door hearing
Arlene "A.J." Delgado is suing the presidential campaign of Donald Trump for allegedly discriminating against her after she disclosed her pregnancy in 2016.CNBC - Business - Donald Trump -
Trump held in contempt for violating gag order in "hush money" trial. Here's why.
Judge Juan Merchan said Trump violated the order nine times in recent weeks and fined him $1,000 for each violation.CBS News - Politics - Donald Trump -
The NBA's new favorite move is less traveling, more time travel -- and it's nearly impossible to stop
Whether it's tapping the brakes after a 100 mph drive like Anthony Edwards, or going from slow to even slower like Luka Doncic and Nikola Jokic, the decel move and its variations are wreaking havoc on NBA defenders.ESPN - Sports -
Move Over, Honey. Teddy Is Getting In.
Sharing a bed with a partner sometimes means making way for a beloved stuffed animal or blanket, too.The New York Times - Lifestyle
More from The Hill
-
Trump attorney cross-examines Stormy Daniels lawyer over Cohen deal: Live updates
Former President Trump's hush money trial began Thursday with a brief hearing related to whether Trump violated a gag order four more times in addition to the nine he was found in contempt of earlier this week. The judge has not yet made a ruling ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
Ex-Trump aide says 'competency and experience' would be 'out the window' in second term
Sarah Matthews, a former spokesperson for ex-President Trump, said on Wednesday she expects a hypothetical second Trump term to be bereft of any aides with “competency and experience.” Instead, she said in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, she ...The Hill - Politics -
US accuses Russia of using chemical weapons in Ukraine
The State Department accused Russia of using chemical weapons in Ukraine on Thursday, following a new set of sanctions against the country. Russia violated the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act by using the ...The Hill - Politics - Ukraine -
Ukraine is outmanned, outgunned and outmaneuvered — should they give up?
Things aren’t looking good for Ukraine.The Hill - Politics - Ukraine -
Polis signs bill strengthening Colorado's 'forever chemical' product bans
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) signed into law Wednesday a bill that will result in sweeping bans of "forever chemicals" across a wide range of consumer products. The law, SB-81, expands upon existing state legislation that prohibited the sale or ...The Hill - Politics