Why Harris’s debate win won’t matter on Election Day
On style, Kamala Harris won her first debate with Donald Trump. She exceeded the low expectations that had been set for her, and she prepared sufficiently well to not have a meltdown like Joe Biden’s in June.
But she failed to achieve four strategic goals to advance her candidacy with independent and undecided voters.
Strategically, Harris needed to use the debate to establish clear differences with Trump on two key issues: economy and immigration. On the economy, Trump is preferred over her by 10 points, according to the Pew Research. On immigration, he is preferred by a seven-point margin. Harris failed to gain ground on these.
To move voters, Harris had to accomplish four strategic objectives:
First, she had to declare her independence by distancing herself from the failures of the Biden administration. Biden was elected to heal a divided nation and return the economy to pre-pandemic levels. On Day One, he decided to transform the economy around green energy and restructure our society to achieve social justice through equity. The problem for Harris is that she has fully committed to these goals, based on her previous statements. Therefore, she cannot distance herself from the programs that were created and the spending that was committed, which spurred the inflation problem we have today.
Gallup polling in January 2020, the height of the Trump economy pre-pandemic, found 41 percent of Americans were somewhat/very satisfied with the country's direction was going; in 2024, that number has dipped to 20 percent. Harris now needs to acknowledge the issue, take some level of responsibility and commit to doing better, by presenting a comprehensive strategy. She failed at all three.
Second, she had to address the fact that she has changed her position on nearly every important policy issue. The right to change your view of issues is a given, but when you are seeking the presidency, it is your duty to explain to the American people why and how this evolution occurred. This is where her strategy to avoid the press has hurt her — she never created a narrative around her evolution to build upon, and this made it more difficult to believe such an evolution at the debate. In the end, she failed to make the case for “moderate” Kamala Harris.
Third, she had to come out of the debate as the established candidate of change. This requires she distance herself from Joe Biden and establish her credentials as a moderate. Being the change candidate would validate her campaign’s main assertion that voters need to turn the page on Trump. But this was an exceedingly challenging task for Harris because she is the incumbent vice president; she already has the power to change things right now, as Trump highlighted in his closing statement.
The problem for Harris is that elections for a second term in the minds of voters are usually about staying the course. In 2024, most voters want to turn the page on Biden’s economy, immigration and crime policies. This may help explain a recent New York Times-Sienna poll that found Trump is seen as the candidate of change by 53 percent of voters polled, compared to 25 percent for Harris. Harris’s failure to clearly establish herself as the candidate of change will force her to defend “staying the course” by redefining the Biden-Harris administration to voters.
Lastly, Harris needed to convey a clear vision for where she wants to take America. She has framed her vision in the broadest of terms as an “opportunity economy.” In her speech in Raleigh, N.C., she said, “As president, I will be laser focused on creating opportunities for the middle class that advance their economic security, stability and dignity. Together, we will build what I call an opportunity economy."
But what does that mean? Details matter. Harris’s failure to make her vision more than a series of unconnected soundbites and disjointed policy prescriptions made her case unconvincing. In the end, members of key voter blocs who participated in post-debate focus groups felt Harris was the risky choice, even though many of them did not like Trump’s style.
Harris’s debate communications needed clear goals and objectives more than rehearsed style points to move the target audience to vote for her. The ball was in her court, and the hill she had to climb was steep. Harris focused on abortion voters, whom she already had, and Trump haters, who were already solidly in her camp. This is why her performance fell short as strategic communications. This is why she won on style but lost on points.
Dennis M. Powell is a strategic management consultant at Massey Powell and author of the book, “Leading from the Top: Presidential Lessons in Issues Management.”
Date: |
-
The New York Times - Top stories
Teamsters Won’t Endorse Trump or Harris in 2024 Presidential Election
The Teamsters president, Sean O’Brien, has shown an openness to former President Donald J. Trump, dividing the powerful union. Neither candidate will be the beneficiary of its considerable ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Trump holding rally in New York, Harris courting Hispanic voters with 48 days till Election Day
With 48 days to go until Election Day, former President Donald Trump is holding a rally in New York where he's expected to focus on immigration and the economy. Vice President Kamala Harris, ...10 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The New York Times - Sports
Why a Visit to the White House Matters for These Champions
Gotham F.C. will become the first N.W.S.L. team to meet with a sitting president.5 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Joe Rogan says Harris is 'nailing it' in debate with Trump
Podcaster Joe Rogan gave Vice President Harris her props after the Sept. 10 ABC News debate telling listeners she’s “nailing it.” “I just wanna say, whoever’s helping her, whoever’s coaching her, ...Yesterday - Donald Trump -
ABC News - Top stories
Polls show Harris gaining after the presidential debate
What the 538 election forecast says after the Harris-Trump presidential debate.Yesterday -
The New York Times - Business
What Trump Has Said About Interest Rates, and Why It Matters
He has suggested that presidents should “have a say” on interest rates, though he later walked the comment back.9 hours ago - Donald Trump -
BBC News - Top stories
Why finding out about Sue Gray’s salary really matters
Chris Mason explains why the story about the prime minister's chief of staff earning £170,000 a year matters.1 hour ago -
The Hill - Politics
Kamala Harris will raise your taxes, no matter what she's saying now
Kamala Harris has promised not to raise taxes for those making less than $400,000, but her proposed tax credits and deductions are not actual tax cuts, and she has promised to let the 2017 Trump ...13 hours ago - Kamala Harris -
The Hill - Politics
Why I am an evangelical for Harris
One of our chief criteria for evaluating and choosing our leaders are the teachings of Jesus calling us to help the vulnerable.6 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Why aren’t we treating cybersecurity as an election issue?
Cyberattacks, election interference, human trafficking and more - why aren't we talking about cybersecurity in the 2024 presidential election?Yesterday
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Republican Arizona county chair endorses Democrat to replace him
The Republican chair of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in Arizona has endorsed a Democrat to replace him. "I am endorsing Joel [Navarro] because he is a man of integrity, because he is a ...58 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Newark official wins special election to fill late New Jersey Rep. Payne's seat
Newark City Council President LaMonica McIver (D) has won the special election to fill a vacant House seat representing New Jersey’s 10th Congressional District, according to Decision Desk HQ. ...1 hour ago -
The Hill - Politics
RFK Jr. says he's helping Trump pick leaders of FDA, NIH, CDC
Former independent presidential candidate and antivaccine advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that former President Trump wants him to choose leaders for key public health agencies if he wins the ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
EPA retaliated against three scientists, says watchdog
Presented by TerraPower — The Environmental Protection Agency’s internal watchdog has found that the agency retaliated against three staffers for expressing different scientific opinions. {beacon} ...2 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
House GOP torpedoes Speaker Johnson’s funding bill
House Republicans voted down Speaker Mike Johnson's proposal to fund the government, leaving the path to averting a shutdown unclear and putting Johnson in danger of disappointing former President ...2 hours ago - House