Why diversity and success are inextricably linked
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caefb/caefb933f86c78de763420baadbc4ec60ddd18c3" alt="Why diversity and success are inextricably linked"
When a military helicopter crashed into a civilian airliner at Washington, D.C.’s Reagan National Airport, sending all 67 souls aboard both aircraft to icy graves in the Potomac, President Trump immediately blamed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
Trump deployed not a single fact to support his attribution of responsibility. He didn’t need any, proffering instead what he called “common sense,” which is more important to Trump than facts or evidence.
The president failed to adduce an iota of evidence implicating DEI in this horrific tragedy, but there is a vast body of facts making clear that what the president regards as “common sense” is flat wrong.
Diversity improves decision making.
About two decades ago, Scott Page and Lu Hong of the University of Michigan demonstrated mathematically that a diverse group of able problem solvers outperforms a group of the best problem solvers. A diverse group of competent people working together makes better decisions than a team comprised only of the very best. Diversity beats homogeneity, even when the homogenous team is made up of only the very best.
Since then, an array of studies have demonstrated that diversity is good for business. In fact, companies with greater levels of diversity generated more revenue, more customers, greater market share and greater relative profitability.
McKinsey examined 366 companies and found those in the top quarter for racial and ethnic diversity were 35 percent more likely to enjoy profits above average for their industry.
Another study revealed diverse teams of investors in venture capital firms made smarter real-world investment decisions, scoring a 26 percent higher success rate than homogeneous teams.
An analysis of 7,615 firms revealed that enterprises run by diverse leadership teams were more likely to develop new products, to innovate, than those with homogenous management.
A study by the Boston Consulting Group found that companies with above average diversity derived 45 percent of their revenue from new, innovative products compared to 26 percent among those with below average diversity scores.
These and other such studies are merely correlational, however. They don’t prove that diversity causes success, but they cast serious doubt on the president’s proposition that diversity causes failure.
Experiments can, and do, demonstrate that diversity leads to better decisions. An experiment with mock juries found that racially diverse juries led to more focus on the facts of the case, fewer factual errors in recalling the evidence and more effective deliberation.
Another experiment asked college students to solve a murder mystery. Those groups with outsiders were twice as likely to reach the correct answer.
In a more recent experiment, diverse teams were 58 percent more likely to price stocks correctly than homogeneous groups, which were much more prone to errors in pricing.
The World Economic Forum — the folks who bring you Davos — summarized the data by stating, “The business case for diversity in the workplace is now overwhelming.”
That’s not to say that working as part of a diverse team is easier. Many of these studies found diversity made for difficulties. In homogenous teams, collaboration can flow more smoothly, while diversity can cause friction, and that friction can be painful as well as fruitful.
Friction makes diversity feel like an impediment to success and homogeneity like a soothing balm on the road to achievement.
However, as uncomfortable as friction of this sort may be, it happens because diversity brings richer information to the table, reduces the tendency to rely on ingrained assumptions, leads to more use of facts and promotes original, innovative thinking.
It’s easier for a team to quickly agree on the same facts, arguments and conclusions, and then move on to toasting themselves at the bar, but that’s seldom a formula for excellence.
In short, diversity causes both some pain and improved outcomes.
The current wholesale degradation of diversity in American government, commerce and education may make some people feel better, but it will impede our national performance, leaving our children and grandchildren worse off.
Diversity didn’t cause death in the air just above D.C.’s airport, but ridding ourselves of diversity may well cause more suffering in the future.
Mellman is president of The Mellman Group a political consultancy. Mellman served as pollster to Senate Democratic leaders for over 20 years. He is also president of Democratic Majority for Israel.
-
Why Being Trustworthy Is a Leadership Hack That Drives Success
Leaders who cultivate trust can significantly reduce employee churn and improve organizational performance.Inc. - 6d -
Fox has a successful streaming brand in Tubi. So why is it launching another video app?
Tubi had more hours streamed in December than Paramount+, Peacock or Max, and it just helped deliver the Super Bowl’s biggest audience.MarketWatch - 2d -
Is Golf’s Newest League a Success?
T.G.L., the indoor simulator league co-founded by Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy, has captured the interest of fans. Not everything has been perfect.The New York Times - 4h -
5 Secrets to a Successful Agency Partnership
Insights on avoiding pitfalls when collaborating with an agency.Inc. - 6d -
Is Jimmy Butler's success with the Warriors sustainable?
Since Jimmy Butler joined, the Warriors have been impressive. Is it enough to make them legit contenders in the West?Yahoo Sports - 1d -
Apple’s diversity policies and OpenAI deal targeted by shareholders
iPhone-maker is rare holdout in Silicon Valley against conservative efforts to force rollback on DEI issuesFinancial Times - 2d -
Apple shareholders reject ban on diversity programs
Apple shareholders rejected a proposal to eliminate internal programs intended to boost the diversity of the company's workforce on Tuesday before its public shareholder meeting.NBC News - 1d -
Apple Shareholders Reject Proposal to Scrap Diversity Programs
Unlike other tech firms, the iPhone maker isn’t walking back its DEI initiatives. And shareholders have now backed that decision.Inc. - 20h -
Researchers link a gene to the emergence of spoken language
Why did humans start speakingABC News - Feb. 18
More from The Hill
-
Trump says Zeldin plans to cut up to 65 percent of EPA staff
President Trump said Wednesday that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has floated cutting the agency’s workforce by up to 65 percent. Speaking at the inaugural Cabinet ...The Hill - 36m -
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is upending British politics
Over the past decade and a half, much of the world has entered a new form of politics in which results must be delivered faster and better than before.The Hill - 36m -
Interior halts employee spending and travel
The Interior Department has paused spending and travel for employees — a move that could potentially hinder scientific work at the agency. An email viewed by The Hill shows that spending limits on ...The Hill - 37m -
Senate confirms top Trump trade negotiator
The Senate voted to confirm a trade attorney and first-term Trump official for the position of America’s top trade negotiator as the Trump administration looks set to reconsider long-standing ...The Hill - 46m -
House Democrats call on Trump to rescind order against gender-affirming care
More than 80 House Democrats are calling on President Trump to revoke an executive order to broadly restrict access to gender-affirming health care for transgender young people, alleging the ...The Hill - 49m
More in Politics
-
Dozens of DOGE ‘receipts’ saved no money and killed contracts meant to boost efficiency
Take a quick look at the Department of Government Efficiency’s list of canceled contracts and you’d think the Agriculture Department spent $25 million on diversity trainings four separate times, ...NBC News - 11m -
Trump says Zeldin plans to cut up to 65 percent of EPA staff
President Trump said Wednesday that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has floated cutting the agency’s workforce by up to 65 percent. Speaking at the inaugural Cabinet ...The Hill - 36m -
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is upending British politics
Over the past decade and a half, much of the world has entered a new form of politics in which results must be delivered faster and better than before.The Hill - 36m -
Interior halts employee spending and travel
The Interior Department has paused spending and travel for employees — a move that could potentially hinder scientific work at the agency. An email viewed by The Hill shows that spending limits on ...The Hill - 37m -
Senate confirms top Trump trade negotiator
The Senate voted to confirm a trade attorney and first-term Trump official for the position of America’s top trade negotiator as the Trump administration looks set to reconsider long-standing ...The Hill - 46m