What Iran's strategic silence means for its broader strategy
The recent assassination in Tehran of Ismail Haniyeh, a senior Hamas leader, has brought to light the complex and often opaque relationships that Iran maintains with non-state actors throughout the Middle East.
Unlike previous incidents, where Iran has swiftly retaliated for such actions, this situation is marked by an unusual silence.
Weeks have passed, and Iran has yet to respond, leaving analysts speculating about whether, how, or when retaliation might occur. This calculated inaction suggests that Iran’s next move may be influenced by broader geopolitical developments, particularly the ongoing efforts for a ceasefire in Gaza. If an agreement is reached, it seems increasingly possible that Iran may opt not to retaliate at all — a surprising departure from its historical approach to proxy warfare.
Iran's cooperation with non-state allies can be understood as part of a broader global pattern of proxy warfare, where states extend their influence and pursue strategic objectives through indirect means. Like many other nations, Iran uses non-state allies to engage in conflicts without the risks associated with direct military involvement. This tactic allows Iran to apply pressure on its adversaries while minimizing the possibility of international backlash.
These alliances are often based on shared ideological or religious beliefs, particularly Iran's promotion of Shia Islam. This ideological alignment mirrors other states' support for non-state actors rooted in common political or religious objectives, such as Saudi Arabia's backing of Sunni groups or U.S. support for democratic movements. In these relationships, Iran provides its allies with weapons, training and logistical support, enhancing their ability to engage in asymmetric tactics such as guerrilla warfare and cyber-attacks.
This dynamic of state support for non-state actors is not unique to Iran but is a common feature of modern conflict, where weaker states leverage unconventional means to challenge stronger military powers.
However, there are distinct characteristics that set Iran's strategy apart. Unlike many other nations, Iran uses religious ideology not only as a tool of influence but as a unifying force that transcends national borders. By fostering a transnational Shia identity, Iran extends its reach through groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and various Shia militias in Iraq. This religious solidarity serves as a powerful means of mobilizing support and exerting influence across the region.
Moreover, Iran's alliances with non-state actors are not merely temporary or transactional. These relationships are deeply institutionalized and have evolved over decades, transforming groups like Hezbollah into major political and military forces with enduring ties to the Iranian state. This long-term commitment contrasts with other state-non-state partnerships, which are often more fleeting and based on immediate strategic interests.
Iran has also blurred the lines between state and non-state actors in ways that few other countries have. By integrating these groups into its broader state military strategy, particularly through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran has created a hybrid model of influence that complicates efforts to counter its actions. This blending of state and non-state forces enhances Iran's ability to project power indirectly, making it difficult for adversaries to identify clear targets for retaliation.
Another distinctive aspect of Iran’s strategy is its support for non-state actors in the digital realm. Beyond traditional military aid, Iran has equipped its proxies with cyber warfare capabilities, giving them the tools to challenge adversaries in both the physical and virtual worlds. This technological sophistication adds a modern dimension to Iran’s influence, allowing it to disrupt its enemies on multiple fronts.
Iran’s network of non-state actors spans the Middle East, creating a regional web of influence often referred to as the "Shia Crescent." This network enables Iran to exert control across multiple countries simultaneously, making it difficult for opponents to counter its influence effectively. By decentralizing conflict and empowering independent yet coordinated non-state allies, Iran has developed a distributed warfare strategy that places pressure on adversaries from multiple directions.
The killing of Ismail Haniyeh, however, has introduced an element of uncertainty into this well-oiled machine of proxy warfare. Iran's decision not to respond immediately suggests a more calculated approach than in the past, one that may be influenced by broader geopolitical calculations. As negotiations for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continue, Iran may be weighing the costs and benefits of retaliation more carefully.
Historically, Iran has positioned itself as a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause, often using its influence over groups like Hamas to challenge Israel. But if a diplomatic resolution to the conflict appears within reach, Iran may see more value in holding back rather than risking further destabilization through military action.
This restraint, if it continues, could signal a significant shift in Iran’s broader strategy. It suggests that Iran may be moving away from immediate military responses in favor of a more long-term, calculated approach that prioritizes its broader geopolitical goals over short-term gains. The silence following Haniyeh’s assassination may indicate that Iran is willing to forgo retaliation if it believes peace in Gaza could ultimately serve its interests better than continued conflict.
Iran’s cooperation with non-state allies is a complex and multifaceted strategy that combines elements of proxy warfare, religious ideology and long-term institutionalization. The killing of Ismail Haniyeh highlights the delicate balance Iran must maintain between its commitments to these non-state actors and its broader geopolitical ambitions.
As Iran’s next steps remain uncertain, it is clear that any decision to retaliate—or not—will be deeply intertwined with the larger dynamics at play in the Middle East. Whether Iran ultimately chooses to respond militarily or hold back, its actions will continue to shape the region's geopolitical landscape for years to come.
Pari Esfandiari is the co-founder and president at the Global TechnoPolitics Forum, a member of the at-large advisory committee at ICANN representing the European region, and a member of APCO Worldwide’s advisory board.
Date: |
-
The New York Times - Top stories
What Mayor Eric Adams’s Crises Mean for New York City
As federal investigations swirl around Mayor Eric Adams, his political influence, his agenda and his re-election effort are at risk.42 minutes ago - New York -
BBC News - Top stories
'Strategy' key to Norris hopes on Baku street circuit
McLaren’s Lando Norris says he is “still hopeful” of a good result in Sunday’s Azerbaijan Grand Prix despite starting the race down the field.5 hours ago -
NBC News - Top stories
The Trump campaign's big bet on a new GOTV strategy worries some Republicans
Former President Donald Trump’s campaign thinks its new get-out-the-vote strategy will serve as a silver bullet to capture key battleground states.6 hours ago - Donald Trump -
The New York Times - Top stories
Once Considered Foes, Iran-Backed Groups Get a Warm Welcome From Iraq
Hamas and the Houthis have opened offices in Baghdad, reflecting the two groups’ evolving relationship with Iraq as Tehran works to build a regional power bloc.1 hour ago -
Financial Times - Business
Embarrassment, what is it good for?
The feeling may be superficial but that doesn’t make it any less agonising11 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
GOP likes its chances of defeating Tester in Montana
Republicans are feeling better and better about their chances of knocking off Sen. Jon Tester (D) in Montana’s hotly contested Senate race, which would greatly increase their chances of winning ...18 hours ago -
The Guardian - World
I’m a devout agnostic. But, like Nick Cave, I hunger for meaning in our chaotic world | John Harris
The spiritual aridity of modern life can be tough to handle. Maybe that’s why the singer, and his new album Wild God, have struck a nerve. There is a tension in 21st-century life that may come ...4 hours ago -
Financial Times - Business
What do women really want?
‘Want’, an anthology of sexual fantasies collected by Gillian Anderson, and Helen King’s scholarly ‘Immaculate Forms’ continue the boom of sex-positive books by female writersYesterday -
CBS Sports - Sports
Top NFL football knockout, survivor pool picks, advice, strategy for Week 2, 2024: Dodge this road favorite
SportsLine's advanced computer model just locked in its top Week 2 NFL survivor picks2 hours ago - NFL -
NBC News - Politics
Buttigieg says false claims about Haitian immigrants are part of Trump campaign’s ‘strategy’
Pete Buttigieg says on Meet the Press that false claims about Haitian immigrants promoted Donald Trump and JD Vance are a strategic move to distract voters from “their actual record and agenda.”1 hour ago - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Buttigieg says ties to Laura Loomer a ‘reminder’ of ‘exhausting chaos’ under Trump
Transportation Sec. Pete Buttigieg (D) said on Sunday that former President Trump’s ties to far-right activist Laura Loomer serve as a “reminder” of the “exhausting chaos” that existed while he was ...22 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Shapiro on Vance’s Springfield claims: He 'should be ashamed of himself’
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) slammed Ohio Sen. JD Vance (R) on Sunday over his amplification of an untrue claim of Haitians eating pets in Springfield, Ohio. “There is a causal connection ...31 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Would Harris be winning if she were a man?
We’ve known for decades that unconscious biases shape our perceptions of men and women in the workplace. But what happens when we bring those biases to the voting booth during a presidential election?36 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Vance, Bash get into heated back-and-forth over Springfield
Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) and CNN anchor Dana Bash got into a heated back-and-forth Sunday over an untrue claim of Haitians eating pets in Springfield, Ohio. In the interview on CNN’s “State of the ...49 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Vance: ‘Laura Loomer is not affiliated with the Trump campaign’
Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), former President Trump’s running mate, said far-right media activist Laura Loomer is “not affiliated with the Trump campaign,” when asked in a Sunday interview about ...59 minutes ago - Donald Trump