Voters have to elect Kamala to find out what she’ll do
![Voters have to elect Kamala to find out what she’ll do](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/07/harriskamala_072224_ap.jpg?w=900)
In the run-up to the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Now many Democrats are urging that same approach with respect to electing Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris: Voters have to elect her to find out what she’ll do.
You won’t find out much about her policies from the unveiling of Harris’s economic plan last Friday. It would be more accurate to call her speech an “economic platitude.” The dictionary defines a platitude as “a flat, dull, or trite remark, especially one uttered as if it were fresh or profound.” And that pretty much sums up Harris’s economic plan so far.
She promised she would provide more detail in the coming months, but that may mean after the election. Politico says many Democrats would prefer she stick with her detail-free campaign.
According to Politico reporters Nicholas Wu and Daniella Diaz, Harris is “leaning into a general positive message that has wider appeal, specifically because it’s light on the details.” And they report that’s just fine with Democrats: “Democratic lawmakers call it a savvy strategy. They’d rather lay out a specific plan post-November, when a potential President-elect Harris would have to staff up her administration and determine her governing priorities.”
Get it? Don’t confuse the voters with details about how Harris would achieve all the promises she made in her speech. Better to keep the voters ignorant of any facts that might raise embarrassing questions — questions that Harris can’t answer.
There are at least three reasons why the Harris campaign is “light on the details” of her policies.
First, the generous explanation. It has been only a month since President Biden announced he wouldn’t be running for reelection and threw his support behind Harris. That’s not much time to develop a comprehensive agenda. That said, she no doubt saw Biden’s physical and mental decline better and sooner than most — though she repeatedly denied it — and surely was working behind the scenes with her closest advisers to develop a contingency plan.
Second, she has no idea how to implement all the policy platitudes she’s proposing. For example, she says she will initiate the “first-ever federal ban on price-gouging on food and groceries.” But how would Harris actually impose price controls on food? Are we talking about prices at the wholesale or retail level? Can she force grocery stores to not raise their prices while ignoring the prices charged by their suppliers? Or would she target the wholesale companies that buy and process food from farmers and ranchers and sell it to the grocery stores?
And when would she implement her price-gouging restrictions? Prices often rise briefly in the wake of natural or manmade disasters, but they usually return to normal long before bureaucrats are able to act. And what if prices rise because of arbitrary shortfalls created when her union backers go on strike? For that matter, since wages are the price of labor, is it price-gouging when unions demand unreasonably high wage increases?
Even as Harris proposes to monitor and micromanage the prices of what could be thousands of food and grocery items, she claims “I will focus on cutting needless bureaucracy and unnecessary regulatory red tape.” But then, who is going to be monitoring nationwide grocery prices? Who’s going to decide if they’re a result of price-gouging?
Harris’s policy platitudes raise lots of other questions. She wants to expand the child tax credit from the current $2,000 per child to $3,600, and perhaps $6,000 for families with newborns. The Tax Foundation estimates that proposal would cost taxpayers $3 trillion over 10 years. How does Harris plan to pay for that proposal? With bigger federal deficits? Higher taxes? The answer is almost certainly both.
When a reporter posed that question, her answer was a rambling word-salad that made no sense with respect to the question asked.
The third and most disturbing reason Harris will be light on specifics is that she and her party need low-information voters. Informed voters ask too many questions and demand too many answers — answers this presidential candidate is not capable of providing.
For years, we’ve heard Biden, Harris and the Democratic Party whine about the growing threats to democracy. Well, one of the biggest threats to democracy is low-information voters. Now we learn that that’s exactly what Democrats want and need.
Merrill Matthews is a public policy and political analyst and the co-author of “On the Edge: America Faces the Entitlements Cliff.”
Date: |
Topics
-
The Guardian - World
X’s AI chatbot spread voter misinformation – and election officials fought back
When the Grok tool gave false information, a collection of election officials sprang into action to tamp it down. Soon after Joe Biden announced he was ending his bid for re-election, ...1 hour ago -
CNBC - Business
California attorney general warns tech platforms to look out for voter deception ahead of election
California Attorney General Rob Bonta cautioned executives at tech companies to work harder to protect voters from deception.11 hours ago - California -
CBS News - Top stories
What voters think of Harris and Trump's debate performances
Voters across the country are reacting to Tuesday's debate. CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion watched it with a group in Pennsylvania. In Michigan, CBS News chief Washington ...11 hours ago - Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Officials say delays in election-related mail could disenfranchise voters
State and local election officials warned that ongoing issues could risk disenfranchising voters.13 hours ago -
Los Angeles Times - Entertainment
Election 2024 (Taylor's Version): Swift outswaggers Trump with her Kamala Harris vote
Taylor Swift unleashes her influence against the Trump-Vance ticket by endorsing Kamala Harris after fake AI images online suggested the megastar backs the Republicans.16 hours ago - Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Voters discuss Trump's comments on 2020 election, Harris' fracking stance
Pennsylvania voters spoke with CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion after the presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. They ...17 hours ago - Donald Trump -
BBC News - Top stories
Undecided Americans impressed by Harris - but will debate shift their votes?
We spoke to seven voters who see the debate as crucial in determining who they will support in November.19 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
3 Meals: Michigan voters reveal what issues will guide their choice in the upcoming election
Major Garrett heads to Saginaw, Dearborn and Charlotte, Michigan, to hear voters' thoughts on the issues shaping their decisions in a state pivotal on the path to the White House.19 hours ago -
NBC News - Top stories
Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris: Will it sway voters?
Music superstar Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for president minutes after she walked off the debate stage following her faceoff with Donald Trump — signing the post as “Childless Cat Lady.” ...23 hours ago - Kamala Harris -
MarketWatch - Business
‘I don’t want anyone telling me what to do’: My second husband wants to put our $750,000 home in a trust for his children. Does he have the right?
“After I retired I sold my home that we had been living in and it became part of my portfolio.”Yesterday
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Biden, can you spare a DIME?
President Biden's over-reliance on economic sanctions to deter Russia and Iran has not been effective. He needs to dive into the diplomatic, information and military playbook as well.30 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Rick Scott to run ad during Miami Dolphins game hitting Mucarsel Powell as a ‘socialist’
Florida Sen. Rick Scott's (R) reelection campaign will run an ad labeling his opponent, former Rep. Debbie Mucarsel Powell, a "silly socialist" during a Miami Dolphins game on Thursday. The ...30 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Morning Report — Post-debate: What’s next for Harris, Trump?
Two days after Vice President Harris and former President Trump faced off in their first presidential debate, one question looms large: Will it move the needle? Pollsters have characterized the ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
GOP senators express frustration with Trump's performance at debate
Senate Republicans are feeling frustrated and disappointed by former President Trump's debate performance and his inability to resist taking the bait from Vice President Harris on side issues such ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
What to know about Google's second antitrust trial
Google is on trial for the second time in two years for alleged antitrust violations, as the Department of Justice (DOJ) accuses the tech giant of dominating all sides of the digital advertising ...1 hour ago - Google