Trump’s move to slash research funding shakes medical community
Efforts by the Trump administration to drastically cut federal investments in medical research are threatening to kneecap major research institutions and stifle scientific progress to combat chronic illnesses.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced last week it was limiting the amount of funding for indirect funds, those meant for administrative and facility costs, to 15 percent. While this move has been halted by a federal judge, university medical researchers fear their work could soon come to a screeching halt.
Richard Huganir, Bloomberg distinguished professor of neuroscience and psychological and brain sciences at Johns Hopkins University, has worked on projects funded by the NIH for more than two decades.
"What would have happened if the cut to 15 percent [to indirect costs] was a reality — which basically would mean that science and universities would be nonviable,” Huganir said. “The students, the postdoctoral fellows who are starting their careers, are incredibly worried and upset that they may not have a career, and so there's a lot of impact, you know, at that level.”
According to Huganir, NIH funding covers roughly 70 percent of research in the U.S. The rest is covered through philanthropy and other federal agencies like the Department of Defense and the National Science Foundation. If federal dollars are cut off or severely reduced, he said the scientific community has “no way to recover.”
The indirect costs that are being targeted by these funding cuts include heating, facilities fees, cleaning and financial management, as well as employing students and support staff.
The 22 state attorneys general who filed the lawsuit requesting a restraining order on the NIH’s action said in their complaint that “universities and research institutions are vital economic and social institutions in each state, employing thousands of their citizens, educating and training thousands more, and creating investment and partnering opportunities with the private sector.”
Even some Republicans have sounded the alarm over the potential impact if NIH funding is slashed.
“A smart, targeted approach is needed in order to not hinder life-saving, groundbreaking research at high-achieving institutions like those in Alabama,” Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) told Al.com.
And it’s not simply that these universities and institutions depend on the NIH. The federal government in turn relies on the work that scientists conduct.
“The government needs this information because at the end of the day, we need to know how to better care for people, how to help reduce the likelihood of chronic disease,” Keri Althoff, professor of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University, told The Hill.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who looks set to become President Trump’s Health and Human Services secretary this week, has cited chronic illness in the U.S. as his top priority. He reportedly told Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), one of the few Republicans who expressed some doubt over his nomination, that he would “reexamine” the NIH cuts, earning her vote.
The mutually beneficial relationship between the NIH and researchers has allowed for the U.S. to become a global leader in biomedical research. If the current rate of work in the U.S. is significantly diminished, China would stand to expand its prominence on the global stage.
“Scientific budgets in Europe are nowhere near what they are in the United States,” Huganir said. “Japan [does] high quality research, but it's nothing compared to the quantity we do.”
“China is expanding tremendously in science,” he added. “The Chinese government is really investing in science in a very big way ... they've become a notable competitor now.”
Advocates have warned that patients stand to lose the most from diminished U.S. medical research.
Lisa Lacasse, president of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, spoke out against the move to cut funding Tuesday, warning that restrictions on research activities and downsizing the federal workforce would have an “indisputable impact on the fight against cancer.”
“If these changes are implemented, cancer patients stand to lose access to innovative treatments and clinical trials, and the United States will lose its global competitive edge in biomedical research,” Lacasse said.
The White House has criticized the “hysteria” in response to the NIH cuts, arguing it is seeking to cut waste in the research field.
“Contrary to the hysteria, redirecting billions of allocated NIH spending away from administrative bloat means there will be more money and resources available for legitimate scientific research, not less,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said.
“The Trump administration is committed to slashing the cottage industry built off of the waste, fraud, and abuse within our mammoth government while prioritizing the needs of everyday Americans.”
However, Althoff at Johns Hopkins said there are already “a lot of checks on all of this information that we need to provide to the federal government to demonstrate that we are doing this work successfully.”
“We do it because we believe in this mission of returning this important information that we find to improve the health of Americans,” she added.
-
Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump Cuts to Medical Research Funding
A coalition of 22 attorneys general sued the federal government, claiming that the $4 billion in cuts would “grind to a halt” studies on cancer, heart disease and other conditions.The New York Times - 2d -
Medical research in jeopardy as Trump seeks to slash funding
Grants from the National Institutes of Health have helped create breakthroughs in cancer treatments, heart disease and vaccine development. But scientists from some of the nation's top medical labs ...CBS News - 1d -
What would be the impacts of Trump's proposed cuts to medical research funding?
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's attempt to drastically cut medical research grants in 22 states that joined together to sue. CBS News digital reporter Alex Tin joins "America ...CBS News - 1d -
Judge pauses steep Trump cuts to medical research funding for now
A federal judge has temporarily blocked the National Institutes of Health from implementing cuts to medical research grants under the Trump administration after 22 states sued to halt the process. ...CBS News - 2d -
Federal judge blocks Trump administration cuts to medical research funding
The National Institutes of Health says the cuts will save more than $4 billion a year, but critics say it puts potentially lifesaving research in jeopardy.CBS News - 2d -
NIH announces it's slashing funding for indirect research costs
The National Institutes of Health announced that the agency is making cuts to grants that support research institutions by limiting the amount of indirect funding for research projects to just 15%.NBC News - 4d -
Trump Administration Cuts Put Medical Progress at Risk, Researchers Say
Grants from the National Institutes of Health come with additional money for overhead. A planned $4 billion cut would leave colleges with large budget gaps.The New York Times - 4d -
Scientists warn Trump’s $4bn funding cuts will harm US medical research
Academics say the move imperils scientific progress and helps America’s rivalsFinancial Times - 4d -
Trump administration to cut billions in medical research funding
National Institutes of Health said the $4bn loss will affect ‘indirect’ funding of buildings, equipment and staff. The Trump administration is cutting billions of dollars in medical research ...The Guardian - 4d
More from The Hill
-
Watch live: Linda McMahon, Trump's pick to lead Education, faces Senate confirmation hearing
Linda McMahon, tapped by President Trump to serve as the leader of the embattled Education Department, is set to testify before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on ...The Hill - 26m -
House Democrats urge Trump to combat egg price hike
Nearly 30 House Democrats are urging President Trump to combat the rising prices of eggs and argued that the executive actions he has taken since taking office have hindered the “government's ...The Hill - 26m -
What does the CNN revamp mean for journalism in the Trump era?
The nation could benefit from a reinvigorated and trusted CNN.The Hill - 26m -
Wholesale prices jump to a 3.5 percent annual increase
Wholesale prices moved up 0.4 percent in January to hit a 3.5-percent annual increase, undergirding consumer inflation that broke 3 percent last month for the first time since the second quarter of ...The Hill - 40m -
Elon Musk is not telling the truth
Despite what he claims, there is absolutely no way Musk works 120 hours a week. His own words prove it.The Hill - 56m
More in Politics
-
Watch live: Linda McMahon, Trump's pick to lead Education, faces Senate confirmation hearing
Linda McMahon, tapped by President Trump to serve as the leader of the embattled Education Department, is set to testify before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on ...The Hill - 26m -
House Democrats urge Trump to combat egg price hike
Nearly 30 House Democrats are urging President Trump to combat the rising prices of eggs and argued that the executive actions he has taken since taking office have hindered the “government's ...The Hill - 26m -
What does the CNN revamp mean for journalism in the Trump era?
The nation could benefit from a reinvigorated and trusted CNN.The Hill - 26m -
Wholesale prices jump to a 3.5 percent annual increase
Wholesale prices moved up 0.4 percent in January to hit a 3.5-percent annual increase, undergirding consumer inflation that broke 3 percent last month for the first time since the second quarter of ...The Hill - 40m -
Elon Musk is not telling the truth
Despite what he claims, there is absolutely no way Musk works 120 hours a week. His own words prove it.The Hill - 56m