Trump, Roberts on collision course as lawsuits creep toward Supreme Court

Chief Justice John Roberts is on a collision course with Donald Trump as the president increasingly tests the limits of the judiciary’s role as the most prominent backstop to his administration’s sweeping agenda.
The president stepped up his attacks this week by calling for a judge’s impeachment, earning a rare public rebuke from the chief justice.
Though it marked the most direct spat yet between the duo since Trump retook the White House, the trail ahead appears rougher as the ever-intensifying barrage of litigation against the Trump administration creeps closer to the Supreme Court.
“If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!" Trump wrote on Truth Social Thursday.
As the president expresses agitation toward district judges who block his policies nationwide, Trump so far has maintained more cordiality with Roberts, refusing to attack him personally.
“The president respects Chief Justice Roberts overall, he just expressed that to me in the Oval Office,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Wednesday.
The restraint was notable, given that Trump has no trepidation for lambasting judges who rule against him. Yet he refused to personally chastise Roberts, who had just rebuked the president for calling for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for ordering the administration to turn around deportation flights last weekend.
The chief justice’s pushback was terse, two sentences in all.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts wrote.
Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, who served alongside Roberts for nearly 17 years, said on CNN this week that “every judge is aware of the climate of the era.”
“He's trying to explain to the people of this country how the legal system works and how it doesn't work,” Breyer said of the chief justice’s rebuke. “It doesn't work by impeaching a judge because you don't like his decision. And, by the way, you may be right. The other side may be wrong. There are two sides, usually.”
When asked if the country is nearing a constitutional crisis, Breyer said “no one really knows.”
“People have different views on that. And the best thing, I think, for the judges is you follow the law. You simply follow the law. And that is what they try to do,” he said.
Trump, for his part, has brushed off Roberts’ rebuke by noting the statement didn’t explicitly name him. Trump stood firmly on his calls to impeach the lower judge but declined to go after Roberts.
“He didn’t mention my name in the statement. I just saw it quickly. He didn’t mention my name,” Trump replied in an interview with Fox News’s Laura Ingraham.
Others in Trump’s orbit were also calling for the judge’s impeachment. That Roberts felt the need to speak out at all – whether Trump was named or not – is rare.
Roberts rebuked Trump once before, during his first White House term, when Trump in 2018 assailed a judge as an “Obama judge” for temporarily blocking the administration from refusing to consider asylum applications.
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. The independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for,” the chief justice said at the time.
In recent years, Roberts has only spoken out against another prominent politician one other time, when he critiqued Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) remarks at a 2020 rally outside the Supreme Court. Schumer told Trump-appointed Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh they “will pay the price” and “won’t know what hit” them as they were inside hearing oral arguments in an abortion case.
During Trump’s first White House term, Roberts often sided with the president, but not always. In 2019, for example, Roberts joined the court’s liberals in refusing to clear the way for the administration to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
As Trump makes sweeping moves on the federal bureaucracy, immigration, federal spending and more in his second administration, Roberts may now face his greatest test of all.
The chief justice has long looked to keep the court above the political fray and once famously compared his role to an umpire who calls balls and strikes. Trump, meanwhile, has long accosted judges whenever they have ruled against him as a defendant and as president, often accusing them of being politically biased and part of the “radical left.” Trump has also, at times, invoked some of their family members.
The two men’s starkly different views on judges’ proper role became apparent at Trump’s joint address to Congress earlier this month, when Trump passed Roberts in the front row of the House chamber.
“You did such a great job, thank you…and they’re still talking about it,” Trump told Roberts as he approached the rostrum.
On the way out, Trump similarly told him, “Thank you again, thank you again, won’t forget it,” patting Roberts’ arm.
The chief justice did not appear to say anything in response.
The now-highly scrutinized exchanges prompted speculation among Trump critics that the president was referencing the Supreme Court’s landmark decision carving out broad criminal immunity for former presidents.
In a Truth Social post, the president later insisted he was referring to how the chief justice swore him in at the inauguration and went on to attack “sleazebag 'journalists’” for trying to “create a divide between me and our great U.S. Supreme Court.”
No matter how Roberts perceived it, at the time, he was preparing to rule against Trump.
Days earlier, the administration filed an emergency application with the court seeking to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid payments. The court issued its decision denying the request the morning after Trump’s speech.
Though Roberts joined the court’s liberal justices to side against the administration, he largely was spared from the spotlight. Instead, the online right directed their barrage of criticism toward Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s third nominee to the court who joined Roberts to form the slim 5-4 majority on the ruling.
But Roberts may not be able to do the same as many of the more than 100 legal challenges filed against major Trump administration directives approach the Supreme Court. Some of the appeals appear designed to prompt Roberts and his conservative colleagues to overturn some of the court’s precedents.
Already, the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court for an emergency intervention to narrow several judges’ nationwide injunctions blocking Trump’s efforts to restrict birthright citizenship. The court is set to rule after briefings concludes early next month.
And other cases are inching closer to the justices. The Trump administration has signaled a desire to bring a lawsuit filed by Democratic attorneys general over frozen teacher preparation grants to the Supreme Court, and challenges to Trump’s independent agency firings could soon arrive too once an appeals court issues its ruling.
“It’s incumbent upon the Supreme Court to reign in these activist judges. These partisan activists are undermining the judicial branch by doing so,” Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said this week.
-
The Memo: Roberts rebukes Trump in latest twist of White House battle with judiciary
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a clear, if implicit, rebuke of President Trump on Tuesday, intensifying a clash between the White House and the judiciary. The Trump administration, ...The Hill - 6d -
Trump legal battles on high court collision course
Presented by National Council on Aging — Plus: Fallout over Trump team group chat {beacon} Trump legal battles on SCOTUS collision course TWO OF PRESIDENT TRUMP's highest-profile legal battles ...The Hill - 8h -
Breyer defends Roberts, federal judges in Trump feud
Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer defended Chief Justice John Roberts and the federal judiciary, stating that judges should not be influenced by public opinion and that impeachment is ...The Hill - 5d -
John Roberts made Trump’s authoritarianism possible. He could still save his own legacy | Steven Greenhouse
The supreme court judge has emboldened and enabled Trump, but the president’s second term must surely have him worried. John Roberts , chief justice of the US supreme court, should be very worried ...The Guardian - 6d -
Trump responds to chief justice's rebuke over call to impeach judge
As several of President Donald Trump’s efforts to shrink and reshape the federal government are being blocked in the courts, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts released a rare ...NBC News - 5d -
Top US Supreme Court justice rebukes Trump's call to impeach judge
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement after Trump called for a judge that halted his deportations to be impeached.BBC News - 6d -
Trump: Roberts didn’t mention my name
President Trump said that Chief Justice John Roberts’ statement on Tuesday didn’t mention him by name while doubling down on his call to impeach a federal judge who ruled against his administration ...The Hill - 6d -
White House locks horns with judiciary over deportations
The Trump administration is on a collision course with the courts after a week spent taunting a federal judge and escalating a battle over whether his orders have been defied. ...The Hill - 2d -
Roberts rebukes Trump, allies over attacks against federal judge
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has issued a rare statement rebuking a push to impeach judges, hours after President Trump echoed such calls amid a clash with a federal judge over migrant ...The Hill - 6d
More from The Hill
-
Buttigieg pushes for accountability after war plans chat breach
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Monday pushed for accountability in the wake of the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, getting access to a group chat in which top ...The Hill - 1h -
Atlantic journalist pushes back on Hegseth comments: ‘He was texting war plans’
Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, pushed back on comments from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the journalist's access to a group chat with information about an attack on ...The Hill - 3h -
Fox’s Brit Hume on Hegseth’s response to war plans texts: ‘Oh for God’s sake’
Fox News political commentator Brit Hume on Monday afternoon pushed back on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claim that "nobody was texting war plans" after news broke that Hegseth and other Trump ...The Hill - 4h -
GOP airs concerns — but treads lightly — over war plans Signal chat: 'It's just wrong'
Congressional Republicans on Monday aired concerns about the Trump administration’s handling of classified material after a report showed top officials used an unauthorized messaging platform to ...The Hill - 5h -
MoveOn warns Schumer, Jeffries of deep problems with base
The liberal group MoveOn has warned Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) about "deep problems" with their base regarding the Democratic ...The Hill - 5h
More in Politics
-
Trump portrait removed from Colorado capitol over president's complaints
A portrait of President Trump in the Colorado state capitol is being taken down after the president criticized the artwork on social media, calling it "purposely distorted."NBC News - 1h -
Buttigieg pushes for accountability after war plans chat breach
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Monday pushed for accountability in the wake of the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, getting access to a group chat in which top ...The Hill - 1h -
Atlantic journalist pushes back on Hegseth comments: ‘He was texting war plans’
Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, pushed back on comments from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the journalist's access to a group chat with information about an attack on ...The Hill - 3h -
U.S. lodges new accusations against Mahmoud Khalil
The Trump administration filed new allegations against Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University graduate student who was detained due to his pro-Palestinian activism on campus. NBC News' ...NBC News - 3h -
Fox’s Brit Hume on Hegseth’s response to war plans texts: ‘Oh for God’s sake’
Fox News political commentator Brit Hume on Monday afternoon pushed back on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claim that "nobody was texting war plans" after news broke that Hegseth and other Trump ...The Hill - 4h