Trump is following Obama’s path to gridlock — and could be creating the anti-MAGA that takes him down
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61722/61722c901d9a9524ad641abb40d19f0eaf6ee5b3" alt="Trump is following Obama’s path to gridlock — and could be creating the anti-MAGA that takes him down"
Presidential adviser Elon Musk, while towering over President Trump in the Oval Office this month, said the Trump coalition has a mandate for reform from the people because Trump and the GOP won both chambers of Congress and the executive branch.
However, forcing a mandate down the American people’s throat is not governing, it’s ruling — and Americans intensely dislike being ruled. If Trump and Musk are not careful, they could end up following former President Obama’s footsteps and make a mistake that alienates the country — and in the process form a strong opposition movement that stagnates the rest of his term.
In 2008, Barack Obama was swept into office on a wave of hope and optimism, campaigning as a “great compromiser.” In his first meetings with congressional leadership, Republicans walked away with the impression that the new president was ready to govern.
Obama and congressional Democrats set out to pass a stimulus package for their first order of business, describing it as a “shot in the arm to the flatlining economy.” Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats had already drafted legislation and were ready to move. Like Musk, the Speaker believed they had a mandate: “We wrote the bill…We won the election.”
While Obama did listen intently to Republicans, he failed to incorporate their ideas into the legislation, and when challenged, he echoed Speaker Pelosi, saying, “Elections have consequences … and I won.” Within the first two weeks of his administration, Democrats passed a one-sided stimulus bill full of Pell Grants, expanded broadband internet and investments in green energy. The legislation failed to prioritize transportation infrastructure, something that would have garnered bipartisan support and probably fractured the Republican opposition. Instead, not a single House Republican voted for the bill.
In 2008, Obama won the popular vote by 52.9 percent, dominated the Electoral College (365 to 173), and expanded his party’s House and Senate majorities. In 2024, Trump also won the popular vote, though by a smaller margin (49.8 percent), and took a smaller Electoral College victory (312 to 226). While Obama may have had the votes to do whatever he wanted in Congress, Trump only has a slight minority in the House and Senate.
Since beginning his second term, Trump has ruled by executive fiat and has unleashed Elon Musk and his DOGE “department” like a bull in a China shop. They are moving fast and breaking stuff just, like Obama and the Democrats did in ’08. They are right; the American people want reform. However, one-party reform is not real change, usually: it’s just a changing of the guard. Some Democrats have acknowledged this in different ways.
California Rep. Ro Khanna offered to help with the DOGE effort, and Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez introduced a bill to establish an electoral reform subcommittee and joined the Blue Dog Coalition, which is “dedicated to the financial stability and national security of the country.” However, Trump and Musk, like Obama and Pelosi, are relying on their own team instead of reaching across the aisle.
History doesn’t bode well for this strategy. When Obama alienated Republicans at the beginning of his administration, it signaled the beginning of the end for him as a compromiser and dealmaker. Then-Minority Leader John Boehner said, “If he had reached across the aisle in a meaningful way, he would have found a lot of Republicans ready to work with him.”
The lack of bipartisanship led to a backlash for Obama and united the Republican opposition, evolving into what would eventually become the Tea Party and then MAGA.
A mandate for change is not a blank check for one party to do whatever it wants. Trump and Musk may want to rethink their strategy with DOGE if they want real reform. If they want to fracture the Democratic opposition and cement change, they need to reach across the aisle, working with the other side to govern. Otherwise, their strategy of ruling might backfire just as Obama’s did.
Jeff Mayhugh is the founding editor of Politics and Parenting and vice president at No Cap Fund.
-
‘Against everything this country stands for’: ex-NFL player Chris Kluwe takes his local anti-Maga protest national
The athlete hopes his arrest after excoriating the Maga movement in a city council meeting will inspire others to resist. Last week the former NFL player Chris Kluwe was arrested at a city council ...The Guardian - 2d -
Musk doubles down on email from federal employees, Trump backs him up
President Trump commented in support of Elon Musk's initiative which led to an email sent by the Office of Personnel Management to federal employees asking for a list of accomplishments during ...CBS News - 3d -
Trump’s tariff push has spooked investors. Here’s what it would take for him to step in to stop the selling.
The latest wobble in the U.S. stock market has been fairly modest so far, with the S&P 500 still within 4% of its record closing high from last week. But that hasn’t stopped some on Wall Street ...MarketWatch - 1d -
Macron, Trump offer contrasting paths to peace in Ukraine
French President Emmanuel Macron met with President Trump at the White House on Monday, marking three years since Russia invaded Ukraine. The meeting came after European powers were excluded from ...CBS News - 3d -
Trump proposes selling 'gold card' path to citizenship
President Trump proposed selling a "gold card" path to U.S. citizenship that would cost $5 million. The president told reporters he believed it would help "wealthy" and "successful" people enter ...NBC News - 2d -
3 ways Trump may be clearing a path for whistleblowers
An unintended consequence emerging from Trump’s imperious leanings is an opening for whistleblowers to fill the breach.The Hill - 1d -
Trump's hostility toward Ukraine creates a conservative rift
President Donald Trump’s recent show of hostility toward Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has opened a rift in Republican circles.NBC News - 6d -
Davidson takes on Saint Louis following Durkin's 20-point showing
Saint Louis Billikens (15-12, 8-6 A-10) at Davidson Wildcats (16-11, 6-8 A-10) Davidson, North Carolina; Tuesday, 7 p.m. EST BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -1.5; over/under is 144.5 BOTTOM ...ABC News - 3d -
UN envoy says creating an inclusive Syrian government could help lift sanctions
U.N. special envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen has said that formation of a “new inclusive government” in Damascus by March 1 could pave the way for lifting sanctions imposed by western countriesABC News - Feb. 20
More from The Hill
-
Karl Rove: Putin wins in Trump-Zelensky dispute
Republican strategist Karl Rove believes Russian President Putin is the only winner in the public spat between President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval ...The Hill - 17m -
Democrats assail Trump, Vance over Zelensky meeting: ‘Russia’s best negotiators’
Democrats on Friday swiftly attacked President Trump and Vice President Vance over their hostile handling of an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky that devolved into a ...The Hill - 25m -
Liz Cheney on Trump-Zelensky blowup: 'History will remember this day'
Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) strongly criticized President Trump for yelling at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during an Oval Office meeting Friday, saying, "History will remember this ...The Hill - 28m -
Thune says Senate will consider bill to restrict trans athletes 'early next week'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) says legislation to prevent transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports will go to the Senate floor “early next week,” ...The Hill - 28m -
Graham: Trump, Zelensky meeting an 'absolute, utter disaster'
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has been one of the most outspoken advocates for supporting the Ukraine war effort, said he was “devastated” by the heated exchange between President Trump, Vice ...The Hill - 31m
More in Politics
-
Karl Rove: Putin wins in Trump-Zelensky dispute
Republican strategist Karl Rove believes Russian President Putin is the only winner in the public spat between President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval ...The Hill - 17m -
Democrats assail Trump, Vance over Zelensky meeting: ‘Russia’s best negotiators’
Democrats on Friday swiftly attacked President Trump and Vice President Vance over their hostile handling of an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky that devolved into a ...The Hill - 25m -
Liz Cheney on Trump-Zelensky blowup: 'History will remember this day'
Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) strongly criticized President Trump for yelling at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during an Oval Office meeting Friday, saying, "History will remember this ...The Hill - 28m -
Thune says Senate will consider bill to restrict trans athletes 'early next week'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) says legislation to prevent transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports will go to the Senate floor “early next week,” ...The Hill - 28m -
Graham: Trump, Zelensky meeting an 'absolute, utter disaster'
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has been one of the most outspoken advocates for supporting the Ukraine war effort, said he was “devastated” by the heated exchange between President Trump, Vice ...The Hill - 31m