Trump has a constitutional obligation to eliminate the Department of Education
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31ebc/31ebcdb5ae16d387778a9f7bb31f681dc887ce5a" alt="Trump has a constitutional obligation to eliminate the Department of Education"
The Trump administration is reportedly preparing an executive order that could eliminate or roll back significant parts of the Department of Education, a move that has already received significant criticism from Trump’s political opponents.
If issued, the order would come on the heels of Trump’s controversial decision to dismantle much of the U.S. Agency for International Development, which is now under the direct authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Democrats have alleged that Trump’s plans to close or significantly scale back some federal agencies, including the Department of Education. Congress, they argue, created the department, and therfore an act of Congress would be needed to close it.
But even without congressional action, Trump does have the legal authority to shutter most of the department’s staff and programs. Rather than wait for approval from Congress — which will likely never come — Trump should simply end most of the Department of Education’s work now and let federal courts work out the constitutionality of the decision.
Ordinarily, the president does not have the authority to close parts of the federal government that have been established by Congress. But in the case of the Department of Education, Trump has every right to act, because Congress had no authority in the first place to empower the department with most of its current programs.
Trump took an oath to faithfully abide by the Constitution, and the Constitution nowhere gives Congress the right to involve itself in most of what occurs at the state and local levels regarding education. Thus, gutting the Department of Education of much of its programming cannot be unconstitutional, because many of the programs are themselves unconstitutional. In fact, if Trump believes the department’s activities are in violation of the Constitution, then he is obligated to shut them down.
The argument against the constitutionality of the Department of Education is remarkably simple. Article I clearly outlines the enumerated powers of Congress. State and local education programs are not mentioned as one of its responsibilities. Article II outlines the power of the nation’s executive office. It does not mention state or local education programs either.
Making matters even clearer, the 10th Amendment plainly states that “powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people.” Since powers related to education are not given to the federal government under Articles I or II, they are “reserved to the states or the people.”
For most of American history, the Department of Education did not exist. Virtually everyone agreed that the federal government had no business involving itself in education. However, opinions changed in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which determined that school segregation was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
Among other things, the 14th Amendment prevents states and local governments from passing laws that treat people unequally or unjustly limit people’s liberties, including the right to due process. Since segregation violated students’ constitutional rights, the federal government had the power and responsibility to stop it.
Federal involvement in education grew dramatically in the wake of Brown. Congress passed a law in 1979 making the Department of Education a cabinet-level agency under the Carter administration. Over the years, funding for the Department of Education has grown rapidly, and the agency has become increasingly influential in local and higher education.
In fiscal year 2025, the total Department of Education budget is $103 billion, which includes spending for programs at both the K-12 and college levels. About 14 percent of K-12 education funding comes from the federal government.
Although most education dollars still come from state and local governments, the infusion of federal dollars has given Congress and the Department of Education the ability to impose a long list of federal guidelines and priorities on school districts and higher education. These requirements include education and teacher standards and testing.
Regardless of whether you support such programs, the Constitution does not allow for the vast majority of what the Education Department does today. The department of course has authority to ensure that state and local governments are protecting the rights of citizens and treating students equally under the law. Segregation policies like those struck down by the Supreme Court in Brown should never be tolerated, and the federal government has the constitutional power to stop them.
But the vast majority of the department’s current programs have nothing to do with equal access under the law or other rights protected by the 14th Amendment. Trump should not only stop these programs — he has a constitutional duty to do so.
Trump does not need to wait for Congress. He has the authority to close most of the Education Department now, excluding those offices and programs created to protect 14th Amendment rights. Failure to close most of the department would not only allow the federal government to continue its interference in local and state education, it would also be violation of the presidential oath of office.
Justin Haskins is a senior fellow at the Heartland Institute and the president of the Henry Dearborn Liberty Network.
Topics
-
Senate HELP Committee advances Trump's Education pick
Politico - 22h -
Mexico to reform constitution in wake of US terrorism designations
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum says she will propose reforms to the country’s constitution to protect Mexico’s sovereignty after U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration designated six ...ABC News - 21h -
Trump Administration Has Fired Health Inspectors at Some Border Stations
Scientists worry that the losses may open the door to human, plant and animal diseases that would otherwise have been caught.The New York Times - 1d -
With Truth Social, Trump Has Official Mouthpiece and a Channel for Revenue
The president’s company, Trump Media & Technology Group, represents a clear mingling of his official duties and his business interests.The New York Times - 1d -
Andrew Tate’s alliance with Trump has been in the making for a long time
Trump’s attempts to intervene in Tate’s rape and human trafficking cases in Romania might seem strange, but their worlds are intimately linked. Ever since I began reporting on Andrew Tate four ...The Guardian - 3h -
Firings Expand at Interior Department With Purge of Probationary Workers
More than 2,000 workers at the Interior Department were fired in recent days, according to counts from workers groups and those familiar with the cuts, as probationary workers were targeted across ...The New York Times - 2d -
Texas to eliminate spring game, joining growing list of college football teams opting for NFL-style OTAs
Longhorns coach Steve Sarkisian is the latest coach to do away with the traditional formatCBS Sports - 15h -
Agriculture Department tries to rehire fired workers tied to bird flu response
The Agriculture Department is scrambling to rehire several workers it fired as part of President Donald Trump’s broad cuts because they were involved in the government’s response to the ongoing ...ABC News - 1d -
Here are the federal departments where terminations have been rescinded
Following the flurry of federal firings as a part of Trump's mission to decrease the government, hundreds of workers were informed that their terminations were rescinded.ABC News - 14h -
Ivory Coast takes control of last remaining French base as French military departs
Ivory Coast has officially taken control of the last remaining French military base in the country as the majority of French forces departed from countries across West AfricaABC News - 23h
More from The Hill
-
Trudeau after Canada hockey win over US: 'You can't take our country — and you can't take our game'
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took a veiled swipe at President Trump on Thursday, after Canada defeated the U.S. in the 4 Nations Face-Off hockey game. “You can’t take our country — and ...The Hill - 41m -
Live updates: Waltz to speak at CPAC amid backlash over Trump's foreign policy
National security adviser Mike Waltz is set to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Friday, amid backlash over President Trump's approach to ending the Russia-Ukraine ...The Hill - 45m -
A DOGE dividend could be a win-win-win for the GOP and Team Trump
With Democrats screaming that the sky is falling every time the Department of Government Efficiency axes one federal worker, Elon Musk’s team needs some good public relations.The Hill - 46m -
How many people over 100 receive Social Security benefits?
Here's how many Social Security retirement checks go out to people 99 and older. Hint: It's far fewer than Trump claims.The Hill - 59m -
Europe’s elite fears Trump, Musk and the truth
The EU's ruling class has become fanatical in its desire to censor.The Hill - 1h
More in Politics
-
Trudeau after Canada hockey win over US: 'You can't take our country — and you can't take our game'
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took a veiled swipe at President Trump on Thursday, after Canada defeated the U.S. in the 4 Nations Face-Off hockey game. “You can’t take our country — and ...The Hill - 41m -
Live updates: Waltz to speak at CPAC amid backlash over Trump's foreign policy
National security adviser Mike Waltz is set to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Friday, amid backlash over President Trump's approach to ending the Russia-Ukraine ...The Hill - 45m -
A DOGE dividend could be a win-win-win for the GOP and Team Trump
With Democrats screaming that the sky is falling every time the Department of Government Efficiency axes one federal worker, Elon Musk’s team needs some good public relations.The Hill - 46m -
How many people over 100 receive Social Security benefits?
Here's how many Social Security retirement checks go out to people 99 and older. Hint: It's far fewer than Trump claims.The Hill - 59m -
Europe’s elite fears Trump, Musk and the truth
The EU's ruling class has become fanatical in its desire to censor.The Hill - 1h