Tim Walz trusts the experts — and that’s why he lost the debate
As Tuesday night’s vice presidential debate came to an end, Gov. Tim Walz (D) used his closing statement to shout out this election cycle’s bizarre political realignment, which has led public figures ranging from “Bernie Sanders to Dick Cheney to Taylor Swift” to come out and support his running mate, Vice President Harris.
A few minutes earlier, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) had been the one mentioning some notable endorsements, name-checking “Bobby Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard” — two “lifelong leaders in the Democratic coalition” who support his and former President Trump’s ticket.
It was a microcosm of a crucially important issue that briefly bubbled to the surface during the 90-minute showdown, and which undergirds many of the policy and style differences between the two presidential tickets. It boiled down to one question: Whom do you trust?
Not you, the voter — but you, the candidate. And what Walz wanted to make very clear, in a remarkable exchange that got little post-debate coverage, was that he trusts the experts.
It began with Walz touting “the experts” that supported the border bill that was killed in the Senate, citing endorsements from the Border Patrol, the Chamber of Commerce and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. A few minutes later, Vance responded to a question on the economy by dismissing the views of “economists” with “Ph.D.s” who “don’t have wisdom” about his side’s tax plan.
Walz used the opportunity to hammer home a point he thought he could score against Vance. “I made a note of this,” he began. “‘Economists can’t be trusted. Science can’t be trusted. National security folks can’t be trusted.’ Look, if you’re going to be president, you don’t have all the answers. Donald Trump believes he does.”
He then transitioned it to a “pro tip of the day” — “If you need heart surgery, listen to the people at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, not Donald Trump.”
It’s hard to gauge whether Walz’s rant on the virtue of trusting the experts was rehearsed or ad-libbed — earlier answers on the Iran-Israel crisis or his lie about Tiananmen Square, which he clearly should have been prepped for, came off as rambling, cringey and at times borderline incoherent. But whether it was a revelation that hit him in the moment or a prepared remark, the inclination was bizarre.
Trust in “the experts” can best be exemplified in polling by Gallup’s “confidence in institutions” survey, which has been conducted yearly for decades. By nearly every measure, Americans’ trust in institutions is at all-time historic lows.
And that distrust is well-earned. As I’ve written before, some of the blame for the decline in trust in “the experts” can be directly laid at the feet of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who so arrogantly bungled the messaging on the COVID pandemic. But he certainly shares the blame with a cadre of other over-credentialed, unimpressive, pseudo-prestigious elites who have failed the public.
And while Walz may have thought he scored an unimpeachable point with his Mayo Clinic quip, no institution was spared the embarrassment of the COVID crisis — recall the 2021 video from the famed medical center, with a supposedly "expert” doctor explaining the way to achieve full herd in immunity in America by vaccinating 70 percent to 80 percent of the population. The Mayo Clinic is expert in certain areas, but an “expert” seal of approval no longer has the sheen it once did after the failures we’ve experienced.
During the debate, Vance pivoted back to the economy as a counter to Walz. “You say trust the experts, but those same experts for 40 years said that if we shipped our manufacturing base off to China, we’d get cheaper goods. They lied about that,” he said. “They said if we shipped our industrial base off to other countries, to Mexico and elsewhere, it would make the middle class stronger. They were wrong about that.”
When Walz appeared to agree with some of that sentiment, Vance said Walz had “acknowledged that the experts screwed up” — a claim Walz dismissed as “a gross generalization.”
Walz planted his flag firmly in the “trust the experts” camp. Good luck with that in November — it’s a dwindling constituency.
“Trusting the experts” blindly, to the detriment of the people, is a losing strategy. But it was his kneejerk deference to authority, institutions, the establishment and the system — in many of the answers that had nothing to do with the “experts” — that led Walz to ultimately lose the debate.
In contrast, Vance’s inherent distrust of these same institutions resonates in our present political and cultural moment.
Politico talked to a body language (yes, of course) “expert,” who scored the debate closer, noting that Vance’s beard could be seen as a “negative” to women, “conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals.” Walz’s “wide eyes” were a positive, that “showed his passion,” and “gave extra weight to his feelings and held our gaze.”
There you have it — another guaranteed way to torpedo “expert” credibility.
Dick Cheney, Taylor Swift … and the “experts.” It’s quite a team.
Steve Krakauer, a NewsNation contributor, is the author of “Uncovered: How the Media Got Cozy with Power, Abandoned Its Principles, and Lost the People” and editor and host of the Fourth Watch newsletter and podcast.
Date: |
Topics
-
Top stories - The New York Times
Tim Walz as a Harris Ally: Folksy, Factually Sloppy and Far Less Visible
The Minnesota governor has brought his charm to the campaign trail, but his debate was uneven and he has so far been scarcely seen on national television. His team says that may be changing.6 hours ago -
Lifestyle - The New York Times
The Vance-Walz VP Debate and the Value of a Boring Suit
A night of few fireworks between the candidates was also a night of little sartorial flair. And that was the goal.Yesterday -
Top stories - CBS News
Walz, Vance stump for running mates after VP debate
Tim Walz and JD Vance were back on the campaign trail Wednesday making their cases for their running mates, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, in the wake of Tuesday's vice presidential debate. CBS ...7 hours ago -
Top stories - CBS News
VP debate ratings show how many people watched the Walz-Vance showdown
An estimated 43.15 million viewers tuned in to the CBS News vice presidential debate.8 hours ago -
Sports - CBS Sports
UFC 307: Why Alex Pereira needs to make it a point of calling out Jon Jones if he wins on Saturday
'Poatan' likely only has a few opportunities left to establish himself as one of the all-time greats and a fight with Jones would do just that1 hour ago - UFC -
World - The Guardian
Starmer repaid freebies to restore trust in politics, minister says
Sarah Jones suggests PM believes he should be held to higher standards now he is in government. UK politics live – latest updates Keir Starmer has repaid thousands of pounds in freebies to ...11 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Record number of kindergartners had vaccine exemptions last year: CDC
The number of vaccine exemptions reported among U.S. kindergarteners reached another record high during the 2023-2024 academic year, exceeding last year's record. According to the Centers for ...48 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Blue Ridge Parkway to be closed indefinitely after Helene, National Park Service says
It comes right as the region – and road – typically sees a boom in usage as weather cools and the leaves change colors.56 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Biden administration restores pre-Trump farmworker protections from pesticides
The Biden administration this week restored Obama-era farmworker protections from pesticides that were rolled back under the Trump administration. The rule restores a requirement preventing people ...57 minutes ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
Walz to attend 'Million Muslim Votes' summit
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, will attend a Muslim American advocacy group's summit on Thursday in an effort to turn out voters as Vice President Harris works ...1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
Tina Peters sentenced to 9 years behind bars in voting system data scheme
A Colorado county clerk was sentenced to nine years in prison Thursday after spearheading a data breach scheme in the 2020 presidential election. District Judge Matthew Barrett sparred with former ...1 hour ago