The Supreme Court’s missed opportunity on the Second Amendment
![The Supreme Court’s missed opportunity on the Second Amendment](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/gun_violence_us_v_rahimi_110723gn01_w.jpg?w=900)
The Supreme Court recently issued a much-awaited opinion upholding a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms.
On paper, it was a win for gun control. In reality, it was a missed opportunity.
The facts of the case were alarming. In December of 2019, Zackey Rahimi and his then-girlfriend got into an argument in a parking lot. As the argument escalated, Rahimi knocked her to the ground and dragged her into his vehicle, causing her to hit her head on the dashboard. Concerned about onlookers, Rahimi grabbed his gun and fired a shot to scare off any witnesses. His girlfriend was eventually able to escape, but he later called her and threatened to shoot her if she ever told anyone about the assault.
Three months later, Rahimi was given notice of a court hearing regarding a domestic violence restraining order that was requested by his former girlfriend, which was then granted. Months later, he was arrested for approaching his former girlfriend’s home in the middle of the night.
Rahimi would find himself in still more trouble in the ensuing months. In December of 2020 and January of 2021, he would commit five public shootings, including one in a Whataburger after his friend’s credit card declined. As a result of these shootings, police obtained a warrant to his home, where they found two firearms that he admitted to possessing. This was a blatant violation of the federal law prohibiting those subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms.
Open-and-shut case, right? Wrong.
Though the trial court convicted Rahimi of the gun charges, the appeals court ruled that the law that he was charged under, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), violated the Second Amendment. In doing so, the court relied on a Supreme Court case issued in 2022, New York Pistol & Rifle Association v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Supreme Court held that, in order for a gun regulation to be constitutional, it must have a “historical analogue.”
According to the Supreme Court, this means that in analyzing whether a modern gun law violates the Second Amendment, courts must decide whether it is sufficiently similar to a historical gun regulation in both why and how it burdens Second Amendment rights. If the modern law does not meet these criteria, it is unconstitutional.
Predictably, this ruling set the lower courts on fire. Struggles over what constitutes an “analogue,” how far back one must look to find “history,” and what to do when the test offered absurd results festered across the country.
Rahimi’s case offers a striking example. In their analysis, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that none of the historical laws that were brought to the court’s attention were sufficiently similar. The reason, though not stated explicitly by the court, was simple: In the period of history that the court insisted on looking to, domestic violence was not punished. It was not until 1871 that Alabama became the first state to recognize a man beating his wife as battery. Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit held that there was no historical analogue to the law, rendering it unconstitutional.
When the Supreme Court took the case, the consensus among experts was that they would uphold the law. And on June 21, 2024, the court issued an 8-1 opinion that proved those experts right. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, holding that the Bruen test should not be construed so narrowly, and that here, the principle underlying several historical laws — that it is permissible to disarm dangerous people — is sufficiently similar to a law disarming those subject to domestic violence restraining orders.
But then he stopped. After clarifying that the specific law at issue in this case was constitutional based on a specific set of historical laws, the court failed to offer any real guidance going forward. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson decried this concern in her concurring opinion, stating that “[L]ower courts are struggling. In my view, blame may lie with us, not them.”
The Rahimi case was undoubtedly a win for gun control advocates and domestic violence prevention groups alike. It is hard to overstate the devastating realities of domestic violence and their interplay with firearms in America. But gun control groups should also recognize Rahimi for what it was: a missed opportunity.
The Supreme Court only takes a handful of cases every year and has now dedicated an unprecedented number of these slots to the Second Amendment in the last three years. Accordingly, Americans should expect a lull in Second Amendment cases in the years that come— in fact, some briefs even advised the court not to take Rahimi because Bruen was too recently decided. With this in mind, Rahimi needed to be a clarification of the Bruen test, not merely an “F” circled at the top of the Fifth Circuit’s paper.
Somehow, in the wake of Rahimi, the lower courts have ended up hardly any wiser, and it will likely be years before they receive any further guidance. Similarly, gun control supporters will hardly know the legal standard against which the laws they advocate will be adjudicated. Undoubtedly, many more cases with outcomes like the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Rahimi are to come. It is up to the Supreme Court to decide when to put an end to the confusion. They certainly haven’t yet.
Gavin Barrett is a third-year law student at Duke University School of Law with a focus on Second Amendment law.
Date: |
Filter
-
ABC News - World
Slovakia's top court approves key parts of a contentious amendment of the penal code
Slovakia’s highest legal authority has ruled that key provisions of a contentious amendment of the penal code drafted by the government of populist Prime Minister Robert Fico are in line with the country's constitution -
The New York Times - World
Why the Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Worries U.S. Allies
Legal experts say the U.S. Supreme Court ruling pushes past most of the norms in effect among American allies, adding more concern about the reliability of U.S. power. -
The Guardian - World
The supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling mocks the rule of law | Corey Brettschneider
Citizens must make this presidential election about rescuing our democracy from authoritarianism. The US supreme court found this week that former presidents have presumptive immunity from prosecution for “official acts”. This ruling doesn’t just ... -
The Wall Street Journal - World
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Takes Back Control
In the term just ended, Roberts moved the law to match his priorities—and didn’t worry about getting liberal justices on board. -
CBS News - Top stories
Jan. 6 victims frustrated over Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunity
Many of the victims and the families of those who were attacked in the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol are sharing their frustration and anger with the Supreme Court.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Politics
Conservative legal scholars say the Supreme Court's Trump immunity decision isn't conservative
The Supreme Court's decision to grant former President Donald Trump absolute immunity for some of his conduct in seeking to overturn the 2020 election has attracted a chorus of criticism from those who saw it as another sign of conservative ...Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Trump's sentencing delayed in New York conviction following Supreme Court immunity decision
Former President Donald Trump's sentencing for his New York criminal conviction has been delayed after the Supreme Court earlier this week ruled presidents have immunity for official acts while in office. CBS News' Robert Costa explains the ...New York -
MarketWatch - Business
‘None of these will survive’: The Supreme Court’s immunity decision may kill all the criminal cases against Trump
The opinion could hamstring all four criminal cases Trump has faced, legal experts say, leaving prosecutors in several — if not all of them — unable to proceed.Donald Trump -
CBS Sports - Sports
Carmelo Hayes welcomes pressure to be WWE's next John Cena or Cody Rhodes: 'I'm worth the opportunities'
Hayes has been tied to WWE champions since the beginning of his NXT run -
NBC News - Top stories
Abortion rights amendment is one step closer to appearing on Arizona's ballot
A proposed amendment to enshrine access to abortion in Arizona’s constitution is one step closer to appearing on the November 2024 ballot.Abortion
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Federal judge issues narrow pause on FTC noncompete ban
A federal judge on Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction on a nationwide ban on noncompete agreements issued this spring, calling into question its future in the face of opposition by prominent business groups. The Dallas-based tax firm Ryan ... -
The Hill - Politics
Gas export projects in limbo
Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter {beacon} Energy & Environment Energy & Environment The Big Story Gas export projects in limbo despite court ruling New gas export projects will likely remain in limbo for many months despite ... -
The Hill - Politics
Clyburn expects ‘mini primary’ for Democrats if Biden withdraws
Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) said he would support the idea of a “mini primary” for the Democratic Party to choose a new candidate if President Biden decides to suspend his campaign amid growing concern from voters. Clyburn joined CNN’s Erica Hill on ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Judge blocks Biden administration's new transgender health protections
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked enforcement of a new Biden administration rule bolstering health care protections for LGBTQ people, handing a preliminary legal victory to more than a dozen Republican-led states that challenged it ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Biden in fundraising pitch: 'No one is pushing me out'
President Biden said nobody “is pushing” him “out” in a fundraising email sent Wednesday as his campaign faces headwinds following a bad performance versus former President Trump in a debate last week. “I'm the Democratic Party’s nominee,” the ...Joe Biden