The new nuclear threat: Belarus
![The new nuclear threat: Belarus](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/07/Belarus_nuclear_getty_ck.jpg?w=900)
On Sunday, Belarus issued a statement that it would use nuclear weapons if its “sovereignty and independence” were threatened. But would such a use violate international law?
The question breaks down into a few sub-questions, the first of which is how Belarus, Russia’s ally in the region, obtained nuclear weapons in the first place. The answer, of course, is that they came from Russia. From there, one must ask whether the stationing of nuclear weapons in Belarus and the training of Belarusian soldiers in the use and operation of such weapons is a violation of international law.
Here the relevant international law comes from the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons, to which both Belarus and Russia are party. Article I of the treaty prohibits “the transfer to any recipient whatsoever [of] nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons,” and Article II prohibits “receiv[ing] the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons.”
It would not be unreasonable at first glance to conclude that Russia’s stationing of the weapons violates the treaty. But there is strong precedent that it does not.
This precedent comes from the longstanding practice of the U.S. and NATO in what are referred to as nuclear “sharing arrangements,” whereby the U.S. stations nuclear warheads in allied countries. The U.S.-NATO argument that such arrangements are legal under the non-proliferation treaty is that the weapons remain at all times under the control of the U.S., thus not violating (or perhaps more accurately not triggering) the treaty. Russia’s stationing of the weapons in Belarus appears to be likewise legal under international law.
What is more questionable is whether use of the weapons by Belarus — not Russia — would violate the nuclear treaty. As soon as control of the weapons is transferred to Belarus, Article I and II of the treaty are triggered, thus constituting a violation of international law.
The other obvious question is whether the use of such weapons violates international law. Here Belarus is likely relying upon Article X of the treaty, which states: “Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country.”
It is no accident that Belarus’ statement contains similar language to Article X, stressing state “sovereignty.”
But a threat to sovereignty is highly subjective. Does international law provide a mechanism by which states may gauge the legitimacy of a purported threat?
The answer is yes. Article X sets out that a state withdrawing from the non-proliferation treaty “shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardized its supreme interests.”
Here, international law provides an objective constraint on the use of nuclear weapons and an opportunity for the international community to come together and define what does, and does not, constitute a valid threat to state sovereignty freeing states to use nuclear weapons.
Belarus’s statement is a warning. It is now up to the world to respond.
Anthony J. Colangelo is the Robert G. Storey Distinguished Faculty Fellow and Professor of Law at the Dedman School of Law, SMU Dallas.
Date: |
Topics
Filter
-
Financial Times - World
Masoud Pezeshkian: Iranian reformer who wants to end his country’s nuclear stand-off
Heart surgeon turned president pledges reform of system millions of his compatriots believe can’t be changedIran -
The Wall Street Journal - World
Canada Averts New Threat of Strikes at British Columbia Ports
Canada averted a new labor disruption affecting its Pacific Coast ports after the country’s labor-relations board deemed as illegal a strike notice issued by a union representing ship and dock foremen. -
Financial Times - World
Belarus opposition calls for Brussels to protect stateless exiles
Also in this newsletter: How mafia organisations are infiltrating local governments in Italy -
The Hill - Politics
Nuclear arms race intensified during Trump’s presidency
Donald Trump's presidency saw the destruction of key nuclear arms control agreements, the beginning of a new nuclear arms race, and a threat of nuclear war against North Korea, all of which have contributed to the increasing likelihood of nuclear ...Donald Trump -
The Wall Street Journal - World
'Nuclear' Jury Verdicts Rise Alongside American Anger
The insurance industry says more U.S. cases are ending with outsize damage awards against corporations. Victims’ lawyers say the amounts are justified. -
ABC News - World
Cancer-stricken Belarusian political prisoner is released after authoritarian president's promise
A prominent Belarusian opposition politician who is suffering from a severe form of cancer has been released from prison, three years after his arrest in the authoritarian country’s crackdown on dissent -
The New York Times - World
Trump Advisers Call for U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing if He Is Elected
A former national security adviser says Washington “must test new nuclear weapons for reliability and safety in the real world,” while critics say the move could incite a global arms race that heightens the risk of war.Donald Trump -
Yahoo News - World
Belarus is building up its military on Ukraine's border and bragging about the 'high combat readiness' of its troops
Ukraine -
ABC News - World
Belarus rights group says 10 ill political prisoners have been freed
A Belarusian human rights group says at least 10 political prisoners have been freed since the country's authoritarian president this week promised to release seriously ill people who were put behind bars in connection with massive protests nearly ...
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
McCarthy calls Jeffries a 'thermometer' amid debate over Biden
Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Monday criticized House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) for his approach to the growing number of Democrats calling for President Biden to step aside as the party’s presumptive nominee for ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Senate panel to hold privacy-focused AI hearing
The Senate Commerce Committee will hold a hearing Thursday centered on privacy-related concerns stemming from the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), the committee announced Monday. The hearing will examine how AI has “accelerated the need for ... -
The Hill - Politics
California must retire gas-guzzling trucks to meet 2045 emissions targets: Study
California must retire existing heavy-duty trucks to meet the state’s 2045 carbon neutrality goals, in addition to promoting the purchase of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs), a new study has found. Stricter policies that cover both the rollout of ...California -
The Hill - Politics
Congressional Black Caucus chair backs Biden
Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), on Monday joined the growing number of Black leaders who have thrown their support behind President Biden as an increasing number of Democrats urge him to end his ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Satanists in Florida offer to fill school counselor roles after DeSantis law
Florida Satanists are volunteering to fill school counselor roles after Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a law allowing religious chaplains into public schools amid staffing shortages. “Nothing in the text of the bill serves to exclude us, and no ...Florida