The entanglement myth: The US has options to stay out of an Israel-Iran conflict
Decision-makers in the Biden administration are afraid Israel’s retaliation against Iran will drag the U.S. into a widening conflict in the Middle East. While Israel continues weighing options, the Netanyahu government continues making threats suggesting massive retaliation is on the table.
“Our strike will be powerful, precise and above all — surprising," Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said. "They will not understand what happened and how it happened.”
Former Middle East Envoy David Satterfield echoed the fears of many in the Biden administration when he told Politico, “What could Israel by itself do without drawing in the United States?”
But fears of entanglement (also referred to as entrapment and chain-ganging) are exaggerated. Great powers such as the U.S. have been able to avoid being dragged into wars over which they only partially share their allies’ interests using several tools. This includes using alliances as tools of management, exploiting loopholes in alliance “contracts” and distancing themselves from war-prone, risk-acceptant clients.
Here’s how the Biden administration may use these tools to avoid a conflict with Iran.
President Biden has said the U.S. would not support Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear installations. However, some, such as the Atlantic Council’s Matthew Kroenig, argue Israel should exploit its “escalation dominance” by striking Iran’s nuclear facilities because Iran has shortened its breakout timeline to one to two weeks, and there does not appear to be any diplomatic solution on the horizon.
Entanglement refers to a state with only a partial interest at stake being drawn into an ally's fight. It is one of two pathologies in international politics with respect to alliances, the other being buck-passing, whereby states refuse to engage in balancing against a threat in hopes that another power will take up the responsibility.
Biden has broad discretion to prevent Israel from attacking Iran because, without American aid, Israel’s ability to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities and energy facilities is limited.
Several factors stand in the way of Israel taking out the Iranian nuclear program in the same way it struck Iraq’s in 1981 and Syria’s in 2007. These include the loss of strength gradient, fuel, Iranian air defenses, Israel’s lack of long-range bombers, and the fact that Natanz and Fordow are buried deep underground and therefore difficult to bomb.
The Biden administration’s attempts to limit Israel’s widening of the war — the “hug Bibi strategy” — have thus far largely failed. This does not mean that the U.S. is out of options. To prevent being chain-ganged into a fight with Iran, Biden could use the alliance with Israel as a tool of management.
The U.S. has done this before. During the Cold War, the U.S. exploited loopholes in alliance contracts with Taiwan and South Korea to prevent them from dragging America into a war with China. The U.S.-Israeli alliance is vague, based on commitments made by U.S. presidents starting with John F. Kennedy in 1962. The U.S. has not made a commitment to Israel like NATO’s Article 5.
The U.S. could tell Israel that if it attacks Iran, the U.S. will deny it the kind of military assistance and intelligence it received in fending off Iran’s attack at the beginning of October. The U.S. deployed two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers that launched a dozen interceptors against Iranian missiles.
Biden could apply additional pressure by threatening economic sanctions. This is not unprecedented. It recently sanctioned a dozen Israelis the State Department said had engaged in violence against Palestinians and were an obstacle to peace. During the Suez Crisis, in February 1957, Eisenhower threatened to withhold $100 million in annual aid unless Israel completely pulled out of the Sinai. Within a month, Israel withdrew its forces.
Biden could distance the U.S. from Israel in case of a widening of the war by taking a page out of Saudi Arabia's handbook and reaching out to Iran. Either publicly or through a third party, the U.S. could inform the Iranians that attacks on American troops and installations are intolerable. However, the U.S. could underscore its distancing itself from Israel by refusing to coordinate troops and fighters with its forces. The U.S. could up the ante by reissuing Gerald Ford’s 1975 threat to reassess the U.S.-Israeli alliance.
Finally, in case of an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, the Biden administration could follow in Ronald Reagan’s footsteps after Osirak.
Reagan had United Nations Ambassador Jeanne Kirkpatrick confer with her Iraqi counterpart in drafting a Security Council resolution condemning the Osirak strike. Should Netanyahu go ahead and attack Iran’s nuclear and oil facilities, the U.S. could draft a similar resolution of condemnation and include Iran by working through a third party, such as Oman.
Critics may say that abandoning Israel in such a manner would damage U.S. credibility with its other allies and embolden American adversaries. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this idea.
In some instances, disloyalty to one reckless ally may be welcomed by other allies. The United States’ Persian Gulf allies may see the withdrawal of military aid and sanctions as prudent measures if it helps shield them from an Iranian or Houthi counterattack.
To prevent U.S. entanglement in an Israeli-Iranian war, the Biden administration could use its influence, through sanctions and denial of military assistance to limit Israeli retaliation. Should hostilities break out, the U.S. could distance itself from Israel by threatening to reassess the relationship and even condemn such an attack in concert with Tehran.
Albert B. Wolf is a global fellow at Habib University.
Date: | |
Tag: | Israel |
-
Top stories - ABC News
Why America's THAAD defense deployment to Israel is a 'gamble' in Iran conflict
Around 100 U.S. troops will soon be on active duty in Israel to help defend the country against the potent missile threat from Iran and its regional allies.4 hours ago - Iran -
Business - Financial Times
Israel assures US that retaliation against Iran will target military
Oil prices fall on signs Benjamin Netanyahu plans to avoid energy sector and nuclear sites2 days ago - Iran -
Top stories - CBS News
How the Army is testing out new tech for future conflicts
Charlie D'Agata goes inside a training exercise at Fort Johnson in Louisiana with the Army's 101st Airborne Division to see how they're preparing for future conflicts.2 days ago -
World - Yahoo News
Lebanese military reports troops killed in Israel-Hezbollah conflict
3 days ago - Israel -
Top stories - NBC News
U.S. is sending a powerful defense system to Israel, deepening its involvement in the conflict
The United States announced it is sending the powerful THAAD advanced anti-missile system and a number of troops to Israel.3 days ago - Israel -
Top stories - CBS News
Lebanon hospitals treating more Israel, Hezbollah conflict victims
Medical facilities in Lebanon are being overwhelmed with increasing numbers of civilians needing attention as Israel continues to target Lebanese sites where Hezbollah members are apparently ...2 days ago - Israel -
World - The Guardian
Middle East crisis live: US warns Israel it will withhold arms funding if Gaza aid doesn’t improve
US state department confirms reports that secretary of state and defense secretary warned Israel . See all our Middle East coverage here Israeli military strikes killed at least 40 ...Yesterday - Israel -
World - Yahoo News
I'm a tech founder who's had to flee Lebanon. The conflict has spiraled at a terrifying rate, but the tech community is still pressing ahead.
3 days ago -
Business - MarketWatch
‘For years, I chalked it up to bad hearing’: My partner has signs of dementia. He’s already spent $750,000. How can I stop him from wiping us out?
“Some of these expenditures were along the lines of ‘Guess what I bought today?’ bad surprises.”6 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Farah Griffin: Vance leaning into 2020 election claims ‘should be disqualifying’
Former White House aide Alyssah Farah Griffin blasted Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) Wednesday for seemingly leaning into former President Trump's claims that the 2020 election was stolen, saying it ...29 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Harris’s record on trade paints a dire picture for American producers, consumers
Vice President Harris' commitment to raising taxes, enacting Venezuelan-style price controls, and further shackling America's energy production would be disastrous for American working families, ...33 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Trump rally shooting review finds 'deep flaws' in Secret Service
An independent review of the July 13 assassination attempt on former President Trump offered a critical review of the Secret Service, said the episode “reveal[s] deep flaws” in the agency and ...35 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Trump’s music break may turn more voters than you think
Based on psychological studies I performed during the 2016 election, the presence or absence of music makes a significant difference in the way people perceive political candidates.48 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Israeli military investigating whether Hamas leader Sinwar killed
The Israeli military on Thursday said it was investigating whether Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was killed in a recent operation. Three militants were killed in Gaza, but their identities are not yet ...52 minutes ago - Israel