The crucial immigration discussion overlooked at the debate
Tuesday’s presidential debate, accurately reflecting voters’ priorities, spent more time on immigration and border security than any other issue except the economy. Unfortunately, post-debate commentators focused on former President Donald Trump’s unsubstantiated claim that migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating dogs and cats, but the two questions before and after that bizarre exchange were actually much more important and deserve a serious follow-up.
Immigration and border security highlight the stark differences between the two candidates’ visions for America. Are we a nation of immigrants, or are immigrants a threat? Both sides say enforce the law, then point to different laws. As a senior Department of Homeland Security official for more than a decade in the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations, I know the challenges of securing our borders. The stakes could not be higher.
To ABC’s David Muir’s previous question, Vice President Kamala Harris said she supported the bipartisan Senate compromise on immigration and border security — a bill that would have made wide-ranging policy, operational and resource improvements, as well as a sizable down payment on making the immigration system more just, fair and secure. After disposing of the dog-eating story, Muir asked Trump the next-crucial question: How would he actually carry out his plan to deport 11 million unauthorized migrants? Trump never got close to answering the question.
Given that mass deportation is central to Trump’s approach to immigration and border security, this non-answer needs follow up, because it is highly likely Trump’s plan will end up creating mass detention camps in America, the scale of which was last seen in the U.S. during the shameful 1940s internment of U.S. citizens of Japanese ancestry.
Here’s why: The U.S., like other wealthy countries, has millions more migrants claiming asylum than our immigration system can handle. Federal courts have ruled that the government cannot detain immigrants indefinitely while waiting to see if they will be granted asylum, so many are released into the U.S. But Republicans decry this as “catch and release,” and want it stopped.
Despite Trump’s claim of “the strongest border in American history,” Trump had two border crises during his term: an intentional policy of child separation in 2018, and a 2019 migrant surge that was solved only after a $4.6 billion supplemental appropriation. Arrivals plummeted during the 2020 pandemic as global travel shut down worldwide — a success that is hardly useful for the future.
The Biden administration reversed many Trump immigration policies but capped the budgets for the three departments that administer the immigration system — DHS, Justice, and Health and Human Services — to little more than Trump-era numbers. The policy changes produced a surge in migrant arrivals, but without additional resources to quickly reject unfounded asylum claims, the case backlog, which had doubled under Trump, doubled again in the first two full years under Biden, leading to more releases but also to more deportations and removals.
Most Americans do not realize that by January 2025, the Biden administration will eventually remove about as many unauthorized migrants from the border as the 1.5 million removed on Trump’s watch.
A Washington “czar” controls policy, resources, operations and messaging across multiple departments. Despite what Trump said, Harris was never truly the border czar. If anything, the Biden administration could be faulted for not having a border “czar” until October 2023, when it sent Congress its first multi-departmental border supplemental appropriation request.
Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas stepped forward in November to negotiate a tough but realistic bipartisan Senate compromise. As Harris said Tuesday night, Trump killed the measure in mid-January. After Biden announced policy changes in June to tighten up asylum procedures and keep families together, unauthorized arrivals fell dramatically.
Harris’s commitment to passing and signing the bipartisan Senate compromise is thus striking. It means there will be no going back to earlier policies with inadequate resources. She committed to an approach that has (Trump excepted) bipartisan appeal. Republicans get a path to ending catch-and-release and stronger enforcement of immigration laws, while Democrats get a process for asylum seekers that is fast, fair and final.
In contrast, Trump promises “the largest deportation operation” in history. But there are not enough Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, or beds in immigration detention—especially for families — to make this work. Trump has consistently said, as he agreed on Tuesday night, he would call on the national guard and local law enforcement to help carry out mass arrests. Trump adviser Stephen Miller has said that the military will build detention facilities behind barbed wire to hold all the people.
Despite what Trump claims, it will be impossible to deport people fast enough. Lower courts will likely block or delay mass deportations until people with legal claims to remain can be heard.
Trump may expect a favorable Supreme Court ruling, but that will take months. Trump could defy lower court orders by offering pardons to officials doing his bidding, as he promised in 2019. Even if Trump uses the military, he will run up against the limited number of aircraft and buses to transfer hundreds of thousands of detainees within the U.S. or to third countries willing to take them.
The nightmare becomes obvious: A second Trump administration could detain hundreds of thousands of people, but it does not have the ability or the capacity to move them out of the country as fast as ICE, the National Guard and local law enforcement can bring them in. Expect to see families behind barbed wire in overcrowded camps, desperate U.S.-citizen children looking for missing immigrant parents, and U.S. citizens swept up in immigration raids.
Trump could avoid this by going slow on deportations, increasing the capacity of the system to fairly but swiftly handle migrants’ claims, and work on a bipartisan basis to secure the personnel and money to implement his policy. But listening to Trump on the campaign trail and Tuesday night, this is not his plan.
Given the undisputed importance of immigration and border security in the 2024 presidential campaign, any interviews or press conferences should press Harris and Trump about their actual plans for the future of immigration and border security. Voters need to understand that Harris and Trump differ more than just in their policy proposals. They have dramatically different visions of what kind of America we will be.
Thomas Warrick is a former DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism Policy and a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, where he directs the Future of DHS Project and convenes the Experts’ Coalition on Borders, Immigration, and Trade.
Date: |
Topics
-
ABC News - World
Many in Indian-controlled Kashmir plan to vote this time to deny Modi total control
For decades, boycotting elections in Indian-controlled Kashmir was a sign of protest against Indian rule12 hours ago -
The Guardian - World
Justin Trudeau under pressure as his party loses Montreal election
Victory by separatist Québécois candidate in once-safe Liberal seat raises questions over Canadian PM’s leadership. Canada’s ruling Liberal party has lost a once-safe seat in Montreal, a result ...11 hours ago -
The Guardian - World
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump’s rhetoric on immigrants: ‘A complete lie that he knows is a lie’
The late-night host discusses Republican lies about Haitian immigrants eating pets in Ohio and Trump’s anger over Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris. With other late-night hosts on holiday ...7 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
Harris slams "hateful rhetoric" from Trump about Haitian immigrants
Vice President Kamala Harris spoke to a National Association of Black Journalists panel in Philadelphia on Tuesday.46 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
CBS Sports - Sports
B1G Time: Indiana's dominance amid 3-0 start should not be overlooked, thoughts on Michigan's QB change
The manner in which the Hoosiers are winning games should serve as a warning to the rest of the Big Ten7 hours ago - NFL -
The Hill - Politics
Joe Rogan says Harris is 'nailing it' in debate with Trump
Podcaster Joe Rogan gave Vice President Harris her props after the Sept. 10 ABC News debate telling listeners she’s “nailing it.” “I just wanna say, whoever’s helping her, whoever’s coaching her, ...4 hours ago - Donald Trump -
GameSpot - Tech
EA Discusses The Possibility Of A Battlefield TV Show Or Movie
EA's Battlefield franchise began 24 years ago with a World War II game, and the early word on the next installment will bring it back to the present . But will Battlefield head to Hollywood after ...11 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
The immigrants you fear are just like your ancestors. Don’t fall for political scare tactics.
Immigrants to America have always faced prejudice and discrimination, but their children assimilate into American culture, proving that they are just like their ancestors who came generations ago.12 hours ago -
CBS Sports - Sports
Victory over Tennessee crucial for Brent Venables? Why Oklahoma coach is (and isn't) facing must-win scenario
The Sooners host their first ever SEC conference game with a familiar face returning on the opposite sideline6 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
Mayoral candidate in Brazil hits rival with chair during live TV debate
Sao Paulo mayoral candidate José Luiz Datena hit rival Pablo Marçal with a chair during a TV debate as they traded jabs over sexual misconduct allegations.11 hours ago - Brazil
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Senate defense committee to hold UFO hearing
The Senate Armed Services Committee is looking to hold a UFO hearing after the November elections, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s (D-N.Y.) office confirmed to The Hill. The hearing announcement follows ...5 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Senate GOP’s patience with Johnson wears thin
Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter {beacon} Business & Economy Business & Economy The Big Story Senate GOP’s patience with Johnson wears thin GOP senators fear Congress may ...12 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Republicans sink IVF bills. Again.
Presented by Plan B One Step — Republicans derided the bill as a show vote {beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story Republicans sink IVF bills. Again. In a repeat of this past June, ...23 minutes ago - Republican Party -
The Hill - Politics
GOP senator insults Arab American witness at hate crimes hearing
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) told an Arab American witness that she should "hide [her] head in a bag" after repeatedly asking her if she supported Hamas and Hezbollah during a Tuesday congressional ...47 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Former governors press for election certification by federal deadline
Former governors pressed for election certification by the federal December deadline, saying the process "is not open to debate" in a Tuesday letter addressed to current governors. “The voters in ...58 minutes ago