The Chinese electric vehicle tariff conundrum
![The Chinese electric vehicle tariff conundrum](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/07/GettyImages-2121899877.jpg?w=900)
Good trade policy is not easy. It is economically complex and often politically intractable, always hard to balance between winners and losers, especially in an election year.
President Joe Biden’s decision to raise tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles is a striking example. The president has added new tariffs on Chinese EVs, semiconductors, batteries, solar cells, steel and aluminum. The tariffs on EVs jumped to 100 percent from 25 percent.
The goal is to keep China from undercutting American companies and threatening manufacturing jobs.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s recent meeting with China’s economic leadership foreshadowed the tariffs. China’s growth model — to find lucrative consumer markets, produce with war-production ferocity, often to overcapacity, and then export aggressively — cannot be tolerated by its trading partners. “China is now simply too large,” Yellen notes, “for the rest of the world to absorb this enormous capacity.” EU President Ursula von der Leyen repeated this message: the EU’s relationship with China “is also challenged, for example through state-induced overcapacity, unequal market access and over dependencies.”
To be clear, tariff protection is designed to reduce the competition that would threaten jobs — but also executive pay, bonuses, and capital gains and dividends to shareholders — all at the expense of consumers. This risk shift and wealth transfer is a form of socialism for the wealthy. It may be necessary given the Chinese juggernaut, just as it might have seemed so in the face of previous German and Japanese juggernauts.
On the other hand, for a quarter of a century, environmentalists have pushed hard for electric vehicles and other clean energy sources to reduce greenhouse emissions. Moreover, there are millions of low-income Americans for whom even a decent $10,000 car — electric or not — would be a godsend.
EVs have always been too expensive. Now, thanks to China’s worrisome growth model, EVs are too cheap. China is producing more than 10 million electric cars a year, some for less than $10,000. The president, horrified at this, couldn’t move fast enough to keep people from buying them. And Trump is right there with him, claiming that tariffs should be higher, and on all Chinese products.
This conundrum would be funny if it weren't potentially tragic. A flood of imports could seriously injure the domestic auto industry, just as China decimated the U.S. solar panel and wind turbine industries. But here is the hard choice: save the auto industry or let Americans get very good cars really cheap while helping save the planet. An injection of tens of millions of low-cost EVs on the world’s roads — subsidized by the Chinese — would definitely slow emissions and increase consumer welfare, thanks to China’s ferocious growth model.
Some have suggested voluntary export restraints, a standard trade tool under President Ronald Reagan, in which the exporting country is “requested” to form a cartel to control exports. Such a cartel, however, would let the exporters reap the higher profits of their Beijing-managed sales to the U.S. Instead, the administration chose Section 301 to unilaterally impose a 100 percent tariff. Tariffs at least transfer the import tax levied on American consumers to the U.S. government.
However, this need not be a rash binary choice. A better strategy is available in American law consistent with our World Trade Organization treaty obligations.
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 offers parties who suffer “serious injury” by excessive imports a “safeguard” protection. This process reaches a more considered, evidence-based outcome and bolsters the role of the rules-based trading system the U.S. has led for the past 75 years.
Safeguard measures, not meant to target a particular country, can be allocated in exceptional circumstances where imports have increased extremely quickly. Importantly, safeguard measures should not last more than four years, but can be extended up to eight years, subject to a determination by competent national authorities that the measure is needed, and that the industry is making the effort to adjust to the new competition. In the U.S., free traders in Congress required a federal investigation after two years to ensure that the protected industry is making a good-faith effort to come up to speed against competitors.
Under this temporary safeguard protection, the president has flexibility to construct a remedy to effectively protect domestic interests and balance winners and losers. With the rigorous analysis of the nature of the “serious injury” to domestic industry provided by the U.S International Trade Commission, the president could, for example, impose a tariff rate quota in which a set number of Chinese EVs could enter the country each year at the existing 25 percent tariff, above which the 100 percent tariff would apply. He could adjust the number of imports and the level of tariffs each year based on analysis of the current effect. Meanwhile, support for domestic industry could speed the needed adjustments to meet Chinese competition, all while Americans are benefitting from good, cheap, low-polluting automobiles.
Those who worry that blocking imports will slow the global emission-reduction process can rest easy. China will produce the electric vehicles whether Americans buy them or not. What we don’t buy, others will. Perhaps the climate will be even better served if those low-polluting vehicles replace cars in less regulated countries.
In a perfect world, the good cheap EVs would go to people for whom a $10,000 car is a lifesaver and not just a way to upgrade the next Caribbean vacation. Perhaps the president could save bold intervention in free-markets for, say, a tax incentive for low-priced Chinese EVs for people who make less than 80 percent of the national median income. If the government insists on interfering in the market, at least do it in a manner both consistent with our trade laws and helpful to the people that most need the help.
Robert A. Rogowsky is professor of trade and diplomacy at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies and adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. He is a former chief economist and director of operations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Date: | |
Tag: | EV |
Filter
-
ABC News - World
Europe is slapping tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles — for now. Here's what to know
The European Union is moving to sharply increase customs duties on electric vehicles made in ChinaEurope -
ABC News - Tech
Europe is slapping tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Here's what to know.
The European Union is moving to sharply increase customs duties on electric vehicles made in ChinaEurope -
BBC News - Top stories
EU hits Chinese electric cars with new tariffs
The move poses a challenge to Beijing, which hopes EVs will help revive the country's flagging economy.European Union -
The Guardian - World
EU brushes aside risk of China trade war over electric vehicle tariffs
Higher tariffs on Chinese EV imports to come into force despite carmakers’ fears of retaliation. Business live – latest updatesThe EU’s top trade official, Valdis Dombrovskis, has brushed aside concerns of trade-war retaliation from Beijing ...China -
The Wall Street Journal - World
EU Confirms Tariffs on Chinese-Made EVs
The European Union confirmed plans to impose additional tariffs on electric cars made in China, dashing hopes of a solution sought by several carmakers whose executives fear reprisal from an escalating trade war.European Union -
The Wall Street Journal - Business
EU Confirms Tariffs on Chinese-Made EVs
The European Union confirmed plans to impose additional tariffs on electric cars made in China, dashing hopes of a solution sought by several carmakers whose executives fear reprisal from an escalating trade war.European Union -
The Wall Street Journal - World
The EU confirmed plans to impose additional tariffs on electric cars made in China, dashing hopes of a solution sought by several carmakers whose executives fear reprisal from an escalating trade war.
The EU confirmed plans to impose additional tariffs on electric cars made in China, dashing hopes of a solution sought by several carmakers whose executives fear reprisal from an escalating trade war. -
BBC News - Top stories
Scammed by the fake Chinese police
Con men threaten to extradite their victims to China if they don’t pay “bail”. -
Wired - Tech
The Best Electric Kick Scooters (2024)
These WIRED-tested two-wheelers will help you scoot scoot scoot around town.
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Pennsylvania capitol evacuated after bomb threat
The Pennsylvania State Capitol building was evacuated Saturday after state lawmakers received an email from an individual claiming they had placed explosives in the complex and were armed with a knife. A House Democratic Caucus spokesperson ... -
The Hill - Politics
Democratic donors call on Biden to step down
More than a week after President Biden’s poor debate performance, calls continue for him to step aside and allow someone else the chance to run. Even after he sat for an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Friday, the president has not ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Hamas clears the way for a possible cease-fire in Gaza after dropping key demand, officials say
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza (AP) — Hamas has given its initial approval of a U.S.-backed proposal for a phased cease-fire deal in Gaza, dropping a key demand that Israel commit up front to a complete end to the war, a Hamas official and an Egyptian ... -
The Hill - Politics
These Democratic lawmakers, officials have publicly backed Biden since the debate
President Biden and his campaign have been in clean-up mode this week after his poor debate performance sparked panic within the Democratic Party and some calls for him to step down. As of Saturday evening, five House Democrats have publicly gone ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Marianne Williamson presses Biden to withdraw: ‘We need to recalibrate quickly’
Former presidential candidate Marianne Williamson is putting pressure on President Biden to withdraw from the race, arguing that the Democratic Party needs to “recalibrate quickly” ahead of the election. Williamson joined Fox News Channel’s Neil ...Joe Biden