Supreme Court justices return to bench for new term
Supreme Court justices returned to the bench for the first time since leaving for their summer recess as their new term officially commenced Monday.
“I have the honor to announce, on behalf of the court, that the October 2023 term of the Supreme Court of the United States is now closed,” Chief Justice John Roberts said in the courtroom.
The upcoming year is set to be dominated by cases implicating transgender rights, guns, the environment, vaping and more.
Even still, the court has fewer blockbuster cases compared to the last few terms. And the court on Monday declined to hear a series of high-profile disputes implicating abortion, campaign finance and special counsel Jack Smith’s warrant of former President Trump’s account on the social platform X.
The presidential election could change things, however, with court watchers largely expecting legal challenges ultimately ending up before the justices one way or another.
The justices kicked off the term Monday with two lower-profile cases centered on unemployment claims in Alabama and pet food.
In the former case, the court reviewed nearly two dozen Alabama residents’ lawsuit against the state for “extreme delays and other irregularities” in processing their unemployment applications during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Supreme Court is weighing whether Alabama could require applicants to exhaust the unemployment system’s appeal process before suing in court.
Adam Unikowsky, the attorney representing the residents, called that process “Kafkaesque” since the problem was an inability to exhaust in the first place.
“We're not saying in this court that we necessarily deserve to win. We just want a chance to be heard,” Unikowsky told the justices.
Edmund LaCour, Alabama’s solicitor general, told the justices that the backlog of applicants who have waited at least 21 days for a hearing has declined from more than 131,000 in January 2022 to about 7,410.
“We anticipate clearing that backlog by the end of the year,” LaCour added.
The second case heard Monday arose from two people’s purchase of “prescription” pet food manufactured by Royal Canin and Purina.
The class-action lawsuit alleges the companies ran afoul of federal food and drug law by misrepresenting that pet owners were legally required to get a prescription before purchasing the products.
At issue is the companies’ bid to move the case from Missouri state court to federal court, which hinges on the original lawsuit alleging violations of federal law.
To keep the case in state court, the two pet owners responded by amending their lawsuit to delete all references to the federal statute. The Supreme Court is now reviewing whether to allow the gambit.
“Respondents cannot cite a single decision of this Court, a single decision of a court of appeals outside of the Eighth Circuit, or a single treatise that supports their position,” said Katherine Wellington, who represented the pet owners.
Ashley Keller, the attorney representing the companies, responded by saying “despite my friend's professed commitment to textualism, she has no choice but to flee to public policy.”
“We can't have these mischievous plaintiffs’ lawyers shopping around for their judges, we're told,” Keller continued. “Now, that concern is not happening in the real world. And my friend's solution wouldn't solve the problem even if it were.”
Things will pick up later this week. On Tuesday, the justices will take the bench to review President Biden’s crackdown on “ghost guns,” and on Wednesday, the court will hear a high-profile execution case.
Decisions in all of the cases are expected by summer 2025.
The court’s return follows a busy summer for the justices. The full court resolved 28 emergency applications during their summer recess, a significant increase from the year prior.
“Our summers used to be, actually, summers,” Justice Elena Kagan joked in July at a judicial conference in California.
Meanwhile, two justices released new books over the summer and went on promotional tours across the country. Justice Neil Gorsuch co-authored a book criticizing overregulation and an explosion of laws, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson released a memoir about her background and journey to becoming the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court.
Date: |
Topics
-
Top stories - CBS News
Supreme Court convenes for new term. Here's a look at some of the cases.
The U.S. Supreme Court is reconvening for its new session Monday. The court's docket includes cases dealing with the regulation of so-called ghost guns and the controversial concept of medical ...5 hours ago -
Politics - NBC News
Supreme Court to take up cases on 'ghost guns' and gender-affirming care in new term
The Supreme Court has begun its new term and has agreed to take up cases on gender-affirming care, "ghost guns" and the death penalty, among others. NBC News' Lawrence Hurley has details on what ...4 hours ago -
Top stories - The New York Times
Supreme Court, Back on the Bench, Is Diligent and Dour
The justices considered a routine case on unemployment benefits in characteristic style, peppering the lawyers with questions and dropping hints about their views.2 hours ago -
Business - Inc.
Supreme Court Will Tackle Workplace Discrimination Case This Term
The high court’s docket includes cases that could recast the threshold for hiring bias claims, as well as suits addressing guns, transgender rights and online pornography.6 hours ago -
Politics - NBC News
The threat of election chaos looms as the Supreme Court returns to action
The Supreme Court returns from its summer break on Monday with a new slate of cases to decide, but it is an issue not even on the docket yet that is the center of attention: the upcoming ...6 hours ago -
Politics - The Hill
Supreme Court declines to resuscitate Georgia Republican’s racketeering suit against Fox News
The Supreme Court will not revive a Georgia Republican’s far-fetched lawsuit against Fox News accusing the conservative news company of racketeering and conspiring to elect his opponent in a 2022 ...7 hours ago -
Top stories - ABC News
Oklahoma death row inmate had three 'last meals.' He's back at Supreme Court in new bid for freedom
Nine times the state of Oklahoma has set a date to execute death row inmate Richard Glossip5 hours ago -
Business - CNBC
Supreme Court rejects Martin Shkreli fine appeal
Martin Shkreli in 2022 was banned from the pharmaceutical industry and ordered to disgorge profits earned from raising the price of the drug Daraprim.21 minutes ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
White House, Fox News' Peter Doocy spar over Helene response
White House press secretary Karine Jean Pierre and Fox News reporter Peter Doocy sparred on Monday over the Biden administration's response to the damage and destruction wrought by Hurricane ...34 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Sen. Rubio: Milton looks 'almost identical' to worst-case storm scenario for Florida
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (R) said Monday that Hurricane Milton looks “almost identical” to a worst-case storm scenario presented to him for the Sunshine State. “Several years ago I asked [the ...43 minutes ago - Florida -
Politics - The Hill
Al Pacino claims he almost died of COVID: 'I was gone'
During a podcast appearance on The New York Times’ “The Interview," Al Pacino claims he once nearly died of COVID.46 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Costco gold bars are selling out as prices for the precious metal break records: Survey
Move over, gas and hot dogs. Costco shoppers are snatching up the store's 1-ounce gold bars despite the market's lofty price for the precious metal.1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
FTC antitrust case against Amazon moves forward, several state claims dismissed
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust case against Amazon will move forward, but several state claims against the e-commerce giant were dismissed, according to a newly unsealed ruling. In ...1 hour ago