Supreme Court allows Honolulu lawsuit against oil companies to proceed

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request by oil companies to dismiss a lawsuit by the city of Honolulu seeking to hold them responsible for the impacts of climate change.

The defendants — Sunoco, Shell, ExxonMobil, BP and Chevron — argued the lawsuit had no standing in state court and could only proceed under federal law. The state Supreme Court had earlier rejected this argument, noting that the case argues on deceptive marketing grounds rather than seeking to restrict interstate commerce.

The conservative-majority court rejected a similar appeal from oil companies in a lawsuit by cities in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawaii and Rhode Island in 2023. However, the court also previously sided against a similar lawsuit from the city of Baltimore on procedural grounds.

The court has also repeatedly sided against the Biden administration on energy and environmental issues, notably against a mandate for power plants to transition to renewable energy and a rule regulating interstate air pollution.

Justice Samuel Alito did not participate in deliberations over whether to take up the case. Such recusals are not typically explained in the court’s orders but it is likely related to Alito’s ownership of oil stocks. The justice similarly sat out discussions on the earlier appeal the court rejected.

Before deciding whether to take up the appeal, the court had requested feedback from the Biden administration, which asked the court to reject the oil companies’ appeals.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) hailed the move in a statement Monday. “The people of Honolulu are demonstrating remarkable leadership in standing up to powerful fossil fuel companies whose disinformation campaigns have directly contributed to the climate harms they now face,” Delta Merner, lead scientist for UCS’s Science Hub for Climate Litigation, said in a statement. “Their efforts serve as a powerful example for communities around the world. This decision is one step in a larger effort to seek accountability and justice.”

The Hill has reached out to the oil companies for comment.

Topics

Who Might Buy TikTok? These Are Five Potential Buyers If the Supreme Court Rules Against It

One group calls itself the People’s Bid for TikTok and says it will restructure the social media company to collect less data on users.
Inc. - 1d
Supreme Court allows Hawaii climate change lawsuits against energy companies

The court fight brought in Hawaii state court is similar to others filed against the nation's largest energy companies by state and local governments in their courts.
CBS News - 1d
Supreme Court allows Hawaii climate change lawsuit to move forward

The Supreme Court turned away appeals filed by various oil companies seeking to shut down a lawsuit brought in Hawaii aiming to hold them accountable for climate change.
NBC News - 1d
Florida appeals court allows lawsuits against Parkland resource officer to proceed

A Florida appeals court ruled on Thursday that lawsuits against the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School resource officer at the time of the 2018 shooting in Parkland, Fla., can go to trial. The ...
The Hill - 4d
Supreme Court to hear final arguments against TikTok ban

The Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding the future of TikTok in the US. It comes nine days ahead of the impending ban aimed at forcing its Chinese parent-company to sell the platform. NBC’s ...
NBC News - 4d
Nathaniel Rothschild files lawsuit against Lars Windhorst

Legal case comes less than six months after scion of banking dynasty agreed to chair German financier’s firm
Financial Times - 5d
TikTok Case Before Supreme Court Pits National Security Against Free Speech

The court, which hears arguments on Friday in a challenge to a law banning the app, has issued varying rulings when those two interests clashed.
The New York Times - 5d
Nigeria’s Seplat moves in to fill gap as foreign oil companies retreat

Buyer of ExxonMobil’s assets in the west African country wants to double production within six months
Financial Times - Jan. 7
TikTok knew its livestreaming feature allowed child exploitation, state lawsuit alleges

Company’s own inquiry found money laundering and children performing sexualized acts for digital currency. TikTok has long been aware that its video livestream feature has been misused to harm ...
The Guardian - Jan. 4