Senate privacy hawks push to kill House amendment to warrantless surveillance bill
Senators on both sides of the aisle are banding together to try and kill a House-passed addition to the bill reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that they argue would force more businesses to aid in government surveillance of foreigners.
An amendment from Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and others would strike from the bill a House provision that redefines what types of communications companies would have to comply with the law.
The House amendment from Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Turner (R-Ohio) was intended to address a mysterious battle by the government to get one unnamed communications company to aid in overseas surveillance, with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) determining a change in law was the only way to force compliance.
A one-pager from House Intelligence Democrats said the measure is “designed to respond to a very specific (and classified) fact pattern.”
But opponents argue the provision was written far too broadly and risks sweeping in a number of businesses.
“The administration says it’s going after a narrower set of companies, but they can’t talk about it because it’s all secret. That’s not how laws, especially surveillance authorities, should be written,” Wyden, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on the Senate floor Friday morning.
“Jamming through a last minute provision that dramatically expands surveillance authorities in a way that could affect almost any American is the height of irresponsibility.”
The provision of the bill shifts the definition of electronic communications service providers, but notes that restaurants, hotels and businesses that serve the public would not be required to comply with Section 702 surveillance.
“The exceptions in the provision are designed to cover every concern that has been raised. It carves out any type of food service, any type of public accommodation, every type of dwelling — homes, apartment buildings — every type of community facility, from libraries to hospitals, to recreational facilities and day care centers,” a senior Justice Department official previously told The Hill.
“Claims that this is a broad expansion of the authority are just incorrect.”
But Wyden argued Friday that even if those businesses were exempt, those who supply communications equipment or services for them may not be.
“Under this provision, landlords, the companies that maintain the cables and wifi, and any number of companies whose employees have access to any of that equipment can all be forced to cooperate with the government’s surveillance,” Wyden said.
Tensions over the provision were on display Thursday when the Justice Department distributed a letter previously only sent to Senate Intelligence leaders seeking to allay fears about the House amendment — likewise making a commitment to only use it narrowly.
“The Department commits to applying this definition of ECSP exclusively to cover the type of service provider at issue in the litigation before the FISC—that is, technology companies that provide the service the FISC concluded fell outside the current definition,” Carlos Uriarte, head of legislative affairs for the Justice Department, wrote in the letter, adding it would disclose the company in a classified appendix.
“To protect sensitive sources and methods, the ECSP provision in H.R. 7888 was drafted to avoid unnecessarily alerting foreign adversaries to sensitive collection techniques.”
To Wyden, that was a tacit admission the measure was not narrowly written enough to prevent abuse.
“The DOJ letter does not deny that the provision authorizes the government to force a broad set of Americans and American companies to assist with warrantless surveillance under Section 702. In fact, DOJ basically concedes this fact by promising that it will only apply the new authorities to certain companies on a secret list,” Wyden said.
“That commitment is worth exactly nothing. It is not even binding on this administration. And it certainly isn’t binding on the next administration.”
Wyden was joined by conservatives like Sens. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) in sponsoring the amendment.
Section 702 of FISA expires at midnight, and any change to the bill would require it to be sent back to the House.
Date: |
Filter
-
Greene's bid to topple Johnson veers closer to backfiring
The Georgia Republican now has to make a choice: Either don't call the ouster vote, or force one and watch it fail. Both options risk hurting her politically.Politico - Politics -
Where the Senate stands on passing House antisemitism bill
Politico - Politics -
Washington’s weird marriage of convenience — hoodied John Fetterman and straitlaced Andy Kim
They don’t have much in common besides being Democrats who don’t want Bob Menendez in the SenatePolitico - Politics -
Senate faces bumpy skies ahead on FAA reauthorization amendments
Politico - Politics -
House China panel asks FTC to probe whether TikTok violated child privacy law
House China Committee asks the FTC to investigate if TikTok targeted children with pop-up messages as it lobbied to avoid a U.S. ban.NBC News - Politics - China -
Greene's bid to topple Johnson veers closer to backfiring
The Georgia Republican now has to make a choice: Either don't call the ouster vote, or force one and watch it fail. Both options risk hurting her politically.Politico - Politics -
House passes antisemitism bill with broad bipartisan support amid campus arrests
The House on Wednesday passed a bill aimed at combating antisemitism as pro-Palestinian protests roil colleges across the United States.NBC News - Politics -
Senators try to add kids online safety bills to FAA act
Senators are trying to add bills that are aimed at boosting kids online safety bills into a must-pass Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization act. Two bills aimed at increasing safety of minors online through data privacy updates ...The Hill - Politics -
'I'm so goddamn sick of it': Republican senator yells at Democratic colleague over change to FAA bill
Sen. Dan Sullivan accused Sen. Tom Carper’s staff of killing a provision that would allow his home state of Alaska more time to implement an EPA requirement.NBC News - Politics -
Transgender Tennesseans want state's refusal to amend birth certificates declared unconstitutional
The fate of a decades-old Tennessee policy that does not allow transgender people to change the sex designation on their birth certificates is in the hands of a federal appeals courtABC News - Health
More from The Hill
-
Pentagon admits airstrike killed civilian, not al-Qaeda leader, in Syria last year
The Pentagon on Thursday acknowledged that it mistakenly killed a civilian in an 2023 airstrike in northwest Syria after U.S. service members misidentified the man as a senior al-Qaeda leader. An internal investigation found that American forces ...The Hill - Politics -
Biden gives remarks on rebuilding infrastructure, securing jobs: Watch live
President Biden will address economic issues in a speech from Wilmington, N.C., Thursday afternoon. Biden is expected to announce funding to replace lead pipes around the country. Earlier on Thursday, the president stopped in Charlotte, N.C., to ...The Hill - Politics - Joe Biden -
Senators try to add kids online safety bills to FAA act
Senators are trying to add bills that are aimed at boosting kids online safety bills into a must-pass Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization act. Two bills aimed at increasing safety of minors online through data privacy updates ...The Hill - Politics -
Maryland plans to rebuild collapsed Baltimore bridge in just over four years
Maryland is expecting to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge over the next four years, in a process that could cost up to $1.9 billion, The Associated Press reported Thursday. The state is looking to construct a new bridge by the fall of 2028, ...The Hill - Politics -
Witness divulges scrutiny of Michael Cohen's phones in Trump hush money trial: Live updates
Former President Trump's hush money trial resumed Thursday, beginning with a brief hearing related to whether Trump violated a gag order four more times in addition to the nine he was found in contempt of earlier this week. The judge has not yet ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump