Republicans tout Supreme Court immunity ruling as victory in 'weaponization' fight
![Republicans tout Supreme Court immunity ruling as victory in 'weaponization' fight](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/04/johnsonmike_scalisesteve_022924gn02_w.jpg?w=900)
Republicans are hailing the Supreme Court’s ruling that presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts as a major victory over government “weaponization” as the decision deals a blow to special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of former President Trump over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
“Today’s ruling by the Court is a victory for former President Trump and all future presidents, and another defeat for President Biden’s weaponized Department of Justice and Jack Smith,” Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a statement, adding that it is “based on the obviously unique power and position of the presidency, and comports with the Constitution and common sense.”
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) similarly said the “weaponization” of the Justice Department’s case against Trump “is outrageous, unconstitutional, and must cease.”
“While it’s becoming increasingly clear Democrats believe their only path to victory in November is through prosecuting their political opponent, today’s decision makes it clear this is not allowed in our constitutional system,” Scalise said in a statement.
Claims of a government “weaponized” against Biden’s political opponents have become core to the Republican party as Trump has faced numerous lawsuits, criminal charges, convictions, and investigations since he rose to power. Combined, it has fueled GOP defenses of the former president.
Sen. John Barrasso (Wyo.), the chair of the Senate GOP and the highest-ranking Republican to comment on the decision as of Monday afternoon, called the opinion "another victory for democracy and the rule of law against Democrat lawlessness,” accusing Democrats and Biden of “weaponizing the justice system” against Trump.
There is no evidence that Biden directed any prosecution of Trump. His campaign, though, said on Monday that the ruling has “amplified” the president’s arguments about the threat Trump poses.
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision on Monday ruled that presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts. It sent the case back to the D.C. District Court, where proceedings had been paused to weigh Trump’s immunity claims.
The ruling gives space, however, for areas of the prosecution to move forward, such as Trump's pressure campaign on former Vice President Mike Pence leading up to Jan. 6, to move forward in court.
Chief Justice John Roberts directed the lower court to assess "whether a prosecution involving Trump’s alleged attempts to influence the Vice President’s oversight of the certification proceeding in his capacity as President of the Senate would pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”
Dissenting justices and Democrats expressed alarm about the implications of the decision, and questioned how far that immunity could reach.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent suggested that the ruling meant a president could order the assassination of his political rivals.
“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune,” she wrote. “Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) took direct aim at that dissent.
“The Supreme Court’s dissent in this case is foolish in every way, particularly Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson’s argument that this decision allows a president to assassinate their opponent. The liberal members of the Court and the Left have lost their minds when it comes to President Trump,” Graham wrote on the social platform X.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the chair of the House Judiciary Committee and its select subcommittee on government weaponization, called on the ideological left to “stop its attacks on President Trump and uphold democratic norms” while hailing the decision — adopting phrasing about democratic norms that Democrats have often used to express alarm about Trump’s refusal to accept the results of the 2020 election and the Jan. 6 riot that defied the tradition of a peaceful transfer of power.
Date: | |
Tag: | Republican Party |
Topics
Filter
-
The Guardian - World
The supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling mocks the rule of law | Corey Brettschneider
Citizens must make this presidential election about rescuing our democracy from authoritarianism. The US supreme court found this week that former presidents have presumptive immunity from prosecution for “official acts”. This ruling doesn’t just ... -
The New York Times - World
Why the Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Worries U.S. Allies
Legal experts say the U.S. Supreme Court ruling pushes past most of the norms in effect among American allies, adding more concern about the reliability of U.S. power. -
CBS News - Top stories
Jan. 6 victims frustrated over Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunity
Many of the victims and the families of those who were attacked in the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol are sharing their frustration and anger with the Supreme Court.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Politics
Ex-DOJ officials who worked for Trump fear the Supreme Court just made it easy for him to weaponize the DOJ
Some ex-Justice Department officials who served under Trump during his first term fear that the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling makes it easier for him to use the DOJ against his enemies if he is re-elected president.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Politics
Conservative legal scholars say the Supreme Court's Trump immunity decision isn't conservative
The Supreme Court's decision to grant former President Donald Trump absolute immunity for some of his conduct in seeking to overturn the 2020 election has attracted a chorus of criticism from those who saw it as another sign of conservative ...Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Trump's sentencing delayed in New York conviction following Supreme Court immunity decision
Former President Donald Trump's sentencing for his New York criminal conviction has been delayed after the Supreme Court earlier this week ruled presidents have immunity for official acts while in office. CBS News' Robert Costa explains the ...New York -
MarketWatch - Business
‘None of these will survive’: The Supreme Court’s immunity decision may kill all the criminal cases against Trump
The opinion could hamstring all four criminal cases Trump has faced, legal experts say, leaving prosecutors in several — if not all of them — unable to proceed.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Top stories
White House weighs options after ruling on immunity as Democrats react with outrage
The White House is considering its options for a response to the Supreme Court's blockbuster ruling on immunity that handed Donald Trump a major victory, as President Joe Biden warns that an amoral future president could abuse those powers. -
NBC News - Politics
After immunity ruling, Trump’s hush money sentencing delayed
After the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity decision, the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York has postponed his sentencing that was scheduled for July 11, moving it to mid-September. NBC’s Laura Jarrett ... -
CBS News - Top stories
Why Trump's "hush money" sentencing is being delayed over immunity ruling
Donald Trump's sentencing for the conviction in his New York "hush money" trial is being postponed until September after his lawyers moved to toss the guilty verdict because of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling. Attorney and CBS ...Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
More states on track to have abortion measures on ballot
Click in for more news from The Hill {beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story More states on track to have abortion measures on ballot Ballot measures in Arizona and Nebraska ensuring abortion access advanced closer to a vote, with groups ...Abortion -
The Hill - Politics
Fauci says he has 'no doubt' Biden is capable of continuing as president
Former White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci said in a new interview he has “no doubt” President Biden is mentally capable of serving as president, amid growing concern among Democrats about the president’s standing as the party’s ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Congress fights nonconsensual deepfakes
Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter {beacon} View Online Technology Technology The Big Story Congress to combat nonconsensual AI porn Political momentum is building to regulate the spread of nonconsensual explicit deepfakes as the ... -
The Hill - Politics
White House seeks to stop the bleeding amid new calls for Biden drop-out
The White House and Biden campaign sought to stop the bleeding on Wednesday, forcefully saying the president will not be dropping out of the race after a disastrous debate underscored concerns about his age and ability to serve. Allies and staff ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Federal judge issues narrow pause on FTC noncompete ban
A federal judge on Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction on a nationwide ban on noncompete agreements issued this spring, calling into question its future in the face of opposition by prominent business groups. The Dallas-based tax firm Ryan ...