Punish the administrators, not the researchers, for campus antisemitism
It is never wise to throw the baby out with the bathwater. But that is the perverse prospect we now face because of the striking failure of many college and university officials to confront campus antisemitism, both during the last academic year and now as the students return to campus.
Political decisionmakers who view the performance of the administrators as unacceptable — and who are answerable to voters rather unimpressed with campus elitism — often have only blunt instruments with which to address the kind of administrative behavior that we have seen.
One such blunt instrument is a potential reduction in federal funding for a wide range of campus activities and functions.
Congressional responsibility for budgeting as part of its role in the foreign and defense policymaking process makes it appropriate, as an example, to eliminate funding for government laboratories in China or other foreign adversaries.
But other programs conducted in substantial part at research universities are hugely efficient economically in terms of spurring technological advances yielding cost reductions, new production processes, new and improved products, and stronger long-term economic growth. Because some products of research efforts are not patentable for various reasons, the private sector is not well positioned to invest the sizable resources needed to pursue them. It is economically efficient for the federal government to make such investments as a substitute, even though the efficient amount of such funding is always a subjective judgment.
Unfortunately, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology — justifiably outraged at the potential antisemitic violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act at universities receiving federal funds — recently sent letters to several federal departments that administer such research grants, pointing out that any such violation of Title VI would make the universities ineligible for federal grant funding.
A cutoff of federal research funding for universities would be deeply problematic in terms of the ongoing process of technological advancement. Universities must maintain the requisite laboratories and centers, and researchers must feel sufficiently confident in terms of their investments in their own human capital. Two examples illustrate the point. Long-term basic research at MIT has proven the utility of superconducting magnets in the long-elusive pursuit of fusion power. Yes, the fusion power lobby has told us for decades that such power is just around the corner. Nonetheless, because the federal funding role for such basic research is wholly justified in any sensible model of limited government, it is justified whatever the specific interests of the research lobby itself.
The Idaho National Laboratory has supported basic research on next-generation sodium-cooled nuclear reactors. Perhaps such a technological advance, if achieved, will prove competitive with natural gas-fired electricity; perhaps not. But the federal financial support of the basic scientific advances needed to prove the theoretical concept clearly is an appropriate function for the federal government.
States would not have the correct incentives because of an obvious free-rider problem, except perhaps in industries that are large components of their respective states' economies. The proper level and allocation of such federal funding are difficult to determine, but there is no obvious reason that the Congressional bargaining process yields inefficient outcomes in this context, and there is no obvious reason that such federal funding should be cut. The only plausible argument is the creation of an interest group on campus (the research institutions) opposed to the long-term progressive drift.
Such basic research is likely to prove more productive when conducted by semi-independent institutions somewhat insulated from political pressures, rather than by federal bureaucracies directly, dependent upon Congress for their budgets. In any event, it is not beyond the ability of Congressional appropriations committees to use federal funding cuts to punish campus antisemitism narrowly without doing damage to the essential need for support of basic research.
Benjamin Zycher is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Date: |
-
Yahoo News - World
Brazil fires need harsher punishment: environmental police boss
1 hour ago - Brazil -
The Hill - Politics
Superbugs could kill 40 million by 2050: Research
Superbugs that are increasingly resistant to infections could kill up to 40 million people between now and 2050, according to new research published in the journal The Lancet. During that time ...23 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
More Americans getting their news from TikTok: Research
A growing share of U.S. adults regularly get their news from TikTok, a trend driven by a surge in the platform’s popularity among adults under 30, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research ...2 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
Most school shootings happen outside campus buildings, data shows
It's easy to focus on building security when it comes to preventing school shootings. Still, CBS News investigators looked through decades of data and found that the majority of these deadly ...Yesterday -
Financial Times - Business
PwC China stops work on $140mn campus as Evergrande crisis mounts
Lavish training institute on tropical island under review as firm reels from fallout from its audits of failed property developerYesterday - China -
BBC News - Top stories
TGI Fridays' UK owner falls into administration
London-listed Hostmore has appointed Teneo as administrators to help it sell the restaurants.2 hours ago - United Kingdom -
The Hill - Politics
Biden administration to convene AI safety summit in California
The Biden administration will host a global safety summit on artificial intelligence in November to discuss the quickly developing technology and efforts to mitigate its risks. Secretary of ...3 hours ago - Joe Biden -
Financial Times - World
UK urged to reform science research funding to compete globally
Report by Lord Mandelson calls for more focus on critical technologies as part of wider industrial strategyYesterday - United Kingdom -
Yahoo News - World
Chinese Researchers Say They Can Detect Stealth Aircraft Using Starlink Satellites
Yesterday
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: Fed Chair Jerome Powell speaks on interest rates, economy
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is expected to announce the first interest rate cuts by the central bank in more than a year on Wednesday afternoon. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has ...33 minutes ago - Federal Reserve -
The Hill - Politics
Telehealth is a lifeline for opioid use disorder. Congress must save it.
In a country where just 1 in 4 people in need of treatment services receive any, expanding access to buprenorphine via telehealth is the best way to connect more people to lifesaving care.33 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Harris leads Trump in Pennsylvania, Michigan, with tighter race in Wisconsin: Poll
Vice President Harris is leading former President Trump in Pennsylvania and Michigan by at least 5 points but has a smaller lead in Wisconsin, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac University. ...56 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
When nations clash, children suffer: Unpacking China's adoption ban
For the impacted families, it is a waking nightmare. For the United States, it is the latest failure of Washington to tame the worst impulses of the Chinese Communist Party.1 hour ago - China -
The Hill - Politics
New partnership unveiled touting White House efforts in Black, Latino communities
Black and Latino voting organizations have teamed up for a new campaign touting the Biden-Harris administration’s efforts to support the two communities over the last three years. The Voto Latino ...1 hour ago