Press pause on college sports' grand redesign
The long-advertised settlement in the private antitrust case House v. NCAA, is now public. The voluminous filing includes excruciatingly sparse detail on a complete overhaul of college sports in the U.S.
The antitrust consumer class action that gave rise to this ambitiously odd redesign puts an end to the illegal restrictions by the NCAA and five power conferences on how college athletes may be compensated. Not surprisingly, the main financial impact of the settlement will be on men’s Division I football and basketball. But it will reverberate throughout college sports, as is clear from critique and pushback over the last several weeks.
The House v. NCAA settlement compensates college athletes for illegally denied past proceeds from, for example, their name, image and likenesses. The centerpiece of the settlement, however, is injunctive relief, or preventing future harm.
This revolves around a player compensation model that includes no scholarship limits, name, image and likeness deals through academic institutions and third parties, salaries, vehicles and other benefits that could amount to millions of dollars for top players.
The settlement in House v. NCAA was hammered out without a trial in federal district court. Instead, defendants were strongly encouraged to settle. Upon obtaining this concession, the plaintiffs’ lawyers took a brush to an empty canvas — creating a grand design for college sports with sweeping and unintended effects.
In deciding whether to approve the settlement, the question for Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California will be: Is it fair, reasonable and adequate? The answer for most fans, athletes and institutions of higher education should be a hard no.
The problem is not so much that college athletes will be compensated. Rather, it is how they will be compensated. The settlement establishes a benefits pool, to which each member institution contributes revenues, subject to a cap.
Generally, revenue sharing of any type invites strategic maneuvering and joint decision-making by the sharers. Many are concerned that the settlement simply replaces the NCAA’s illegal, collusive agreement with another one, but among a different set of stakeholders.
The settlement’s rules for the pool also create incentives that assure money will flow only to the high-revenue sports in the most lucrative, well-resourced programs. This will create a new super league of professional college men’s football and basketball teams, operating in an insulated arena of competition. It will leave lesser schools in the proverbial dust, grappling with a different flavor of competition in the sub-league, while subsidizing the super-league benefits pool.
Many will say that college sports were heading in this direction anyway. But few would agree that the reverberation of the settlement throughout the U.S. college sports system is warranted.
For example, the settlement contains loosely specified connections between athletes and the process of actually obtaining a degree. Colleges less able to compete for players are likely to abandon non-revenue sports.
The existing conference structure will likely collapse, to the dismay of fans and athletic competition itself. Title IX is likely to suffer, as will the Olympic development program. Women’s sports, except for basketball, will be the big losers.
Judge Wilken should hit the pause button on the settlement in House v. NCAA. Remaking the model of college sports in the U.S. is not a job for parties with a financial interest in the size of the settlement. It is a job for Congress, through national legislation that also carefully considers state laws, the goals of education and amateurism in college sports.
But the settlement even has this problem covered, suggesting that legislation should simply “implement or codify” the terms of the settlement. That’s a lot of hubris that would be nipped in the bud by a judicial finding that the settlement overreaches.
Diana L. Moss is the Progressive Policy Institute's vice president and director of Competition Policy. She is a former president of the American Antitrust Institute.
Date: |
Topics
-
BBC News - Top stories
'Sport's trial of the century to begin': Premier League v Man City on 115 charges
Man City's trial on 115 charges of breaking Premier League rules is set to begin on Monday. BBC Sport looks at why it matters and how we got here.1 hour ago - Premier League -
The Wall Street Journal - World
College Grades Have Become a Charade. It's Time to Abolish Them.
When most students get As, grading loses all meaning as a way to encourage exceptional work and recognize excellence.2 hours ago -
CBS Sports - Sports
Buffalo vs. UMass live stream, how to watch online, CBS Sports Network channel finder, odds
CBS Sports Network is home to three games in the Week 3 slate2 hours ago -
GameSpot - Tech
Grand Theft Auto 6 Might Not Benefit From PS5 Pro In Ways That You Expect
With Sony announcing the PlayStation 5 Pro earlier this week, a lot of attention has now shifted towards how the improved power of the console might be used to enhance both games on the market, ...3 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Watch live: White House holds press briefing
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is slated to deliver remarks Thursday during a press briefing. The event is scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m. EDT. Watch the video above.5 hours ago -
CBS Sports - Sports
Where to watch USMNT coach Mauricio Pochettino's introductory press conference: Live stream, TV channel, time
The Argentine will be officially introduced on Friday in New York6 hours ago -
Yahoo News - World
Fiat 500 electric production pauses for one month
6 hours ago -
CBS News - Top stories
Presidential candidates pause campaigns to honor 9/11 victims at Ground Zero
On Wednesday, presidential candidates stood alongside President Biden at Ground Zero to honor victims of the 9/11 attacks. Today, Democrats are ramping up campaign efforts with Vice President ...7 hours ago -
NBC News - Top stories
Harvey Weinstein indicted on new charges by New York grand jury
Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced mogul whose alleged sexual misconduct fueled the #MeToo movement, has been indicted on new charges by a New York City grand jury.7 hours ago - New York -
Politico - Politics
Democrats press oil executives on Trump's $1B ask
2 days ago - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Harris campaigned $47M in 24 post-debate
Vice President Harris’s campaign raised $47 million in the 24 hours after the debate against former President Trump, a campaign official said on Thursday. The haul was driven by grassroots ...17 minutes ago - Kamala Harris -
The Hill - Politics
Senate Dem: ‘Neither party has any credibility’ on taxes and debt levels
Ahead of expirations in the tax code scheduled for next year, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) said Thursday that neither Democrats nor Republicans were particularly trustworthy when it comes to the ...27 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
FDA approves Apple's AirPod hearing aid capability
Apple’s new Airpod Pros will double as an over the counter hearing aid. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a hearing aid feature, which is a software-only mobile medical application on ...31 minutes ago - FDA -
The Hill - Politics
Harris mocks Trump's debate performance at campaign rally
Vice President Harris on Thursday mocked former President Trump’s debate performance, calling him out for having “concepts of a plan” at a rally in North Carolina. Harris poked at Trump for saying ...34 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Democrats seek to tax fossil fuel companies over climate change
A large group of Democrats is looking to force the fossil fuel industry to pay for climate change. Lawmakers unveiled a bill Thursday that would allow the Treasury Department to impose fees on ...54 minutes ago - Climate