Patients, not government, should set health care prices
One of us trained with a world-renowned neurosurgeon who practices outside of the U.S. and operates on “inoperable brain tumors” with outcomes that leave other neurosurgeons in awe. He provides free or discounted care to half of his patients. For others, he charges 10-100 times what Medicare pays. Patients from around the world eagerly wait to see him and gladly pay, with many even wanting to pay more after surgery. That’s the value of his labor.
If this neurosurgeon were to practice in the U.S., no patients would have access to his care through Medicare. This is because Medicare, which sets a universal rate for all neurosurgeons, does not pay for the value of rare skills like his. The price-setting process, which costs billions of taxpayer dollars each year, incorporates neither patients’ value assessments nor providers’ variation in care delivery.
He cannot provide free care to Medicare patients either. Medicare regulations prohibit physicians from not billing patients, due to the assumptions made by Congress in the 1980s that physicians only offer free care to their friends.
Americans should ask ourselves: Do we prefer to buy our own health care, or would we rather have the government take our money, buy it for us, and make the rules? Is there anyone better suited than patients — the beneficiaries of all care — to serve as the arbiters of its value and set prices?
What if Medicare stopped setting prices and allowed patients to control their dollars? Patients would bear both the financial and clinical consequences. In response, physicians would adjust their services and fees to enhance value and attract patients, just as direct-to-consumer providers (e.g., plastic surgery) have been practicing: voluntary transparency, competitive quality, and declining prices. As a result, a provider’s prices would reflect her patients’ collective willingness to pay and her willingness to accept, thereby representing the true value of her labor.
Bureaucratically set prices are rarely right. For example, Medicare pays more to hospitals than to physician practices for the same service, citing higher operating costs in hospitals. However, if patients control their money, few would prefer hospitals at higher prices, which would shift routine, low-acuity services out of hospitals. The market would naturally and efficiently specialize, allowing hospitals and physician practices to focus on what they do best, while patients reap the greatest value.
Medicare is also concerned about physician kickbacks. The Stark Law was introduced because Congress decided in the 1980s that physicians were self-referring patients to financially affiliated entities. Similarly, the Affordable Care Act banned the establishment and expansion of physician-owned hospitals, citing concerns over physicians’ conflicts of interest and profiteering motives.
Certainly, physicians want to care for their patients and make a profit — who doesn’t? Some policymakers believe they can legislate greed out of physicians, overlooking the fact that every other player in health care is also trying to make money. Dialysis care was better and cheaper when nephrologists owned and operated their dialysis centers, and most profitable hospitals are largely non-profit.
The best antidote to greed is greed itself. Eliminating anticompetitive regulations would allow greedy players to compete among themselves and allow greedy patients to pick winners and weed out losers. The freer the market, the greater the innovation and competition, and the better off the patients and taxpayers will be.
Every American, especially Medicare beneficiaries, should have access to health savings accounts and low-premium insurance plans that exclude routine, elective procedures. Subsidies for low-income patients should be directed to their Health Savings Accounts, which should also accept tax-deductible contributions from private entities and individuals.
The direct-pay market would operate as efficiently as other retail industries. Patients would pay the same transparent price to the same provider, with no one denied access to the best physician or clinic due to their insurance restrictions — that’s health equality. Providers would retain the freedom to charge less or nothing for patients at their discretion — that’s charity care.
Our health care policies have grand intentions but offer disappointing outcomes because they pursue the fool’s errand of relying on government to set the “right” prices and engineer the “right” behavior in the name of patient protection — while only the collective wisdom of patients knows what those are. Health care is patients’ lives, others’ business. Nothing protects patients more than free markets. Let patients, not government, lead.
Phillip Cezayirli is a neurological surgeon in Birmingham, Ala. Ge Bai is a professor of accounting and health policy at Johns Hopkins University.
Topics
-
These Settings Aren’t Real. But for Dementia Patients, What Is?
Fake nurseries and town squares seem to comfort patients. But some experts wonder whether they are patronizing, even infantilizing.The New York Times - 9h -
Lawsuit Seeks to Undo Affordable Mental Health Care Rule
A trade group wants to undo a Biden administration-backed rule helping 175 million Americans access affordable mental health services.Inc. - Jan. 17 -
Former GOP congressman predicts bipartisan support for health care legislation
Former Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-Ind.) said in an interview Thursday that he expects pieces of health care legislation that were dropped amid talks to avert a government shutdown last month will be ...The Hill - Jan. 16 -
Insulin Prices Dropped. But Some Poor Patients Are Paying More.
A law that coaxed companies to lower the price of drugs came with a little-known consequence: smaller discounts for low-income health clinics.The New York Times - Jan. 16 -
My health care is under attack — but not from who you think
America's veterans have We’ve earned the basic dignity of deciding where our medical care comes from, whether that upsets the status quo in Washington or not.The Hill - Jan. 11 -
Massachusetts law aims to prevent repeat of Steward Health Care crisis
The law is intended to prevent the financial maneuvers Steward used to siphon money away from direct patient care.CBS News - Jan. 8 -
UnitedHealth shareholders demand review of policies that 'delayed or denied' health care access
Shareholders of UnitedHealth Group (UHG) are calling on the company's board of directors to release a report on how its policy of limiting or delaying access to health care may be impacting the ...The Hill - Jan. 8 -
A(nother) Government Plan for Social Care
Health and Social Care Secretary promises to "grasp the nettle on social care reform”BBC News - Jan. 3 -
US health care reform: Why there are no easy fixes
While attention has been focused on the manner in which insurance companies handle claims, the broader issue is how the U.S. health system should be improved to serve the public interest.The Hill - Jan. 3
More from The Hill
-
The Age of Fear: How fear is suffocating America
Fear is suffocating America, contributing to its spiritual and moral disintegration, and contributing to tribalism, where individuals are judged by their identity rather than their actions.The Hill - 49m -
Michigan priest has license revoked after imitating Musk's gesture at Pro-Life Summit
A Michigan priest had his license rescinded by the Anglican Catholic Church after imitating a cross-body gesture that tech billionaire Elon Musk made at an event following President Trump's ...The Hill - 1h -
Live updates: Trump tariff threats materialize; Minnesota's Ken Martin to lead Democrats
President Trump is slated to make good on his campaign promise and enact steep tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners Saturday. For months, Trump has threatened Canada and Mexico with ...The Hill - 1h -
As DEI falters, Black Americans should revisit the vision of Marcus Garvey
Marcus Garvey ignited one of the most phenomenal social movements in modern history and was admired around the world. Yet few today understand his quest to promote the economic and cultural ...The Hill - 1h -
Ken Martin elected next DNC chair
Minnesota state party chair Ken Martin was elected on Saturday as the next leader of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after securing more than 246 votes out of the 428 members who voted, ...The Hill - 1h
More in Politics
-
The Age of Fear: How fear is suffocating America
Fear is suffocating America, contributing to its spiritual and moral disintegration, and contributing to tribalism, where individuals are judged by their identity rather than their actions.The Hill - 49m -
Michigan priest has license revoked after imitating Musk's gesture at Pro-Life Summit
A Michigan priest had his license rescinded by the Anglican Catholic Church after imitating a cross-body gesture that tech billionaire Elon Musk made at an event following President Trump's ...The Hill - 1h -
Live updates: Trump tariff threats materialize; Minnesota's Ken Martin to lead Democrats
President Trump is slated to make good on his campaign promise and enact steep tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners Saturday. For months, Trump has threatened Canada and Mexico with ...The Hill - 1h -
Ken Martin elected next DNC chair
Minnesota state party chair Ken Martin was elected on Saturday as the next leader of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after securing more than 246 votes out of the 428 members who voted, ...The Hill - 1h -
As DEI falters, Black Americans should revisit the vision of Marcus Garvey
Marcus Garvey ignited one of the most phenomenal social movements in modern history and was admired around the world. Yet few today understand his quest to promote the economic and cultural ...The Hill - 1h