Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices
![Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/05/ocasiocortezalexandria_052224gn03_w.jpg?w=900)
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) announced Monday that she will soon file impeachment articles against at least one justice on the Supreme Court in the wake of their decision to grant partial immunity to former President Trump as he faces felony charges for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
Ocasio-Cortez, a prominent liberal on the House Oversight Committee, said the ruling belies a central premise of America’s constitutional design — namely, that no one is above the law — and threatens to put the country on a path to tyranny.
“Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture,” she wrote on the social platform X. “I intend on filing articles of impeachment upon our return.”
She did not specify which, or how many, of the justices she would target. Her office did not immediately respond to questions seeking clarification on Monday.
The criticisms echo those coming from other Democrats and legal scholars following the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump cannot be prosecuted for “official” actions he undertook as commander in chief. The decision arrived as Trump faces four felony charges related to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to President Biden, and his role in the rampage at the Capitol on Jan. 6, when a mob of Trump’s supporters stormed the building in a failed attempt to stop Congress from certifying Biden’s victory.
“The Framers of the Constitution envisioned a democracy governed by the rule of law and the consent of the American people,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said. “They did not intend for our nation to be ruled by a king or monarch who could act with absolute impunity.”
Trump’s GOP allies, who have accused Biden of “weaponizing” the Justice Department to damage a political opponent, had a decidedly different view. They quickly hailed the ruling as a guardrail protecting presidents from retaliatory political attacks.
“The President of the United States must have immunity, like Members of Congress and federal judges, which is necessary for any presidency to function properly,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), chair of the GOP conference, said in a statement.
The Supreme Court did not define what constitutes an “official” action, leaving that distinction to the discretion of a lower court. The decision all but ensures that the outcome of the case will not be known before voters go to the polls in November to decide the next president — a delayed timeline that prompted howls from Democrats and other Trump critics, who accuse him of orchestrating the violence of Jan. 6.
Fueling the Democrats’ attacks, two of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, both have connections to Trump’s “Stop the Steal” movement. Critics say that, as a result, both should recuse themselves from any cases related to Jan. 6 — an entreaty they have refused.
Ocasio-Cortez, in announcing her impeachment articles, alluded to those connections, suggesting that justices who won’t police themselves demand that Congress step in to fill the void.
“The Supreme Court has become consumed by a corruption crisis beyond its control,” she wrote Monday.
Date: |
Filter
-
The Wall Street Journal - World
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Takes Back Control
In the term just ended, Roberts moved the law to match his priorities—and didn’t worry about getting liberal justices on board. -
MarketWatch - Business
‘None of these will survive’: The Supreme Court’s immunity decision may kill all the criminal cases against Trump
The opinion could hamstring all four criminal cases Trump has faced, legal experts say, leaving prosecutors in several — if not all of them — unable to proceed.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Top stories
Civil rights group files lawsuit alleging housing discrimination against a DACA recipient
A national Latino legal and civil rights organization is suing a property management company for allegedly denying a young woman in New Jersey access to rental units based solely on her immigration status as a DACA recipient. -
The New York Times - World
Why the Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Worries U.S. Allies
Legal experts say the U.S. Supreme Court ruling pushes past most of the norms in effect among American allies, adding more concern about the reliability of U.S. power. -
The Guardian - World
The supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling mocks the rule of law | Corey Brettschneider
Citizens must make this presidential election about rescuing our democracy from authoritarianism. The US supreme court found this week that former presidents have presumptive immunity from prosecution for “official acts”. This ruling doesn’t just ... -
CBS News - Top stories
Jan. 6 victims frustrated over Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunity
Many of the victims and the families of those who were attacked in the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol are sharing their frustration and anger with the Supreme Court.Donald Trump -
NBC News - Top stories
Appeals court rejects Broadway producer's antitrust claim against actors' and stage managers' union
An appeals court on Tuesday rejected an appeal by an award-winning producer who claims a union's illegal boycott prevented him from producing shows. -
NBC News - Politics
Conservative legal scholars say the Supreme Court's Trump immunity decision isn't conservative
The Supreme Court's decision to grant former President Donald Trump absolute immunity for some of his conduct in seeking to overturn the 2020 election has attracted a chorus of criticism from those who saw it as another sign of conservative ...Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Trump's sentencing delayed in New York conviction following Supreme Court immunity decision
Former President Donald Trump's sentencing for his New York criminal conviction has been delayed after the Supreme Court earlier this week ruled presidents have immunity for official acts while in office. CBS News' Robert Costa explains the ...New York -
NBC News - Politics
Ex-DOJ officials who worked for Trump fear the Supreme Court just made it easy for him to weaponize the DOJ
Some ex-Justice Department officials who served under Trump during his first term fear that the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling makes it easier for him to use the DOJ against his enemies if he is re-elected president.Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
More states on track to have abortion measures on ballot
Click in for more news from The Hill {beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story More states on track to have abortion measures on ballot Ballot measures in Arizona and Nebraska ensuring abortion access advanced closer to a vote, with groups ...Abortion -
The Hill - Politics
Fauci says he has 'no doubt' Biden is capable of continuing as president
Former White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said in a new interview he has “no doubt” President Biden is mentally capable of serving as president, amid growing concern among Democrats about the president’s standing as the party’s ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Congress fights nonconsensual deepfakes
Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter {beacon} View Online Technology Technology The Big Story Congress to combat nonconsensual AI porn Political momentum is building to regulate the spread of nonconsensual explicit deepfakes as the ... -
The Hill - Politics
White House seeks to stop the bleeding amid new calls for Biden dropout
The White House and Biden campaign sought to stop the bleeding Wednesday, forcefully saying the president will not be dropping out of the race after a disastrous debate underscored concerns about his age and ability to serve. Allies and staff ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Federal judge issues narrow pause on FTC noncompete ban
A federal judge on Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction on a nationwide ban on noncompete agreements issued this spring, calling into question its future in the face of opposition by prominent business groups. The Dallas-based tax firm Ryan ...