Mulvaney: Trump is correct, authority over abortion should be returned to the states
What Donald Trump said about abortion last week has many Republicans pulling their hair out.
“My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint,” he said. “The states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land. In this case, the law of the state.”
Judging by the response of many on the right, you would have thought he was calling for more federal support for Planned Parenthood.
The president of the Susan B. Anthony List, a leading pro-life voice, declared that she was “disappointed” with the statement. She added that “[u]nborn children and their mothers deserve national protections and national advocacy from the brutality of the abortion industry.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was more blunt: “The states’ rights only rationale today runs contrary to an American consensus … and will age about as well as the Dred Scott decision.”
Former Vice President Mike Pence bemoaned that the statement was a “slap in the face to the millions of pro-life Americans who voted for him in 2016 and 2020.”
I’ve worked with SBA on-and-off since I got to Washington. Lindsey Graham is my senator and we are close. I served with Mike Pence, both in the House and the White House, and our team helped build arguably the strongest pro-life administration in history. I have great respect for all of those people generally, and most especially on the issue of protecting human life.
But I am also one of the “millions of pro-life Americans who voted for” Trump in 2016 and 2020. And I certainly don’t feel slapped in the face.
I honestly don’t know what all the hubbub is about. After all, giving authority over abortion to the states has been Republican orthodoxy for nearly five decades. Indeed, it has been a prominent weapon for exposing the failings of Roe v. Wade for two generations.
Judicial Watch recently suggested that the Supreme Court “should overturn Roe…and return abortion regulation to the States where it began, and where it belongs.”
The Christian Legal Society commented that Roe “profoundly departs from our deep-seated history of federalism,” and that abortion “concerns matters of health care and family law traditionally left to the states.”
A group of 12 Republican governors has decried that the court’s abortions rulings before Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization “are prime examples of invading an area that has not been committed to the federal government and remains reserved to the states.”
Their statements about returning abortion to the states weren’t made in a vacuum, either, nor at some pro-life conference or GOP fundraiser. Rather, I am referring the amicus briefs that these groups submitted to the Supreme Court as part of the arguments in the Dobbs decision.
All of these leading voices, both inside and outside of government, have made strong statements about federalism on the issue of abortion, and they are all correct.
Even the Susan B. Anthony List, which is now attacking Trump’s position, argued in its brief on Dobbs that the court “can and should show greater deference to the outcomes of state legislative processes.”
So, help me out here: Isn’t Donald Trump saying the exact same thing now that many of the leading voices in the pro-life movement said as part of the Dobbs debate? Isn’t he saying the same thing that pro-life conservatives have been saying since 1973?
Don’t misunderstand me: I would very much like for abortion to be illegal everywhere. And as someone who believes that life begins at conception, even the typical exceptions contained in abortion laws create serious moral conundrums.
But I am also a conservative, who recognizes that we live in a constitutional republic. There are certain rules to how we are governed that are sacrosanct. One of those rules is that the federal government is strictly limited in what it can regulate.
We should not — indeed, we cannot — ignore that, no matter how much we want to protect the unborn.
Let’s say Republicans go into this election cycle clamoring for a federal law limiting abortion. What, then, will our argument be if we lose that election and Congress passes a federal law guaranteeing abortion-on-demand during all nine months of pregnancy, precisely as Democrats have promised to do?
My bigger concern is that many Republicans are now so quick to reject Trump’s statement because they worry that, having won the battle to move the abortion issue to the states, we cannot win at the state level. Just as liberals could not get their way legislatively on abortion in the 1970s and turned to the federal judiciary, Republicans would now be counting on Washington to bail them out of the 50 battles they need to be fighting.
The executive director of another pro-life group said that “when (Trump) made that statement … I nearly spit out my water… It is certainly not consistent with the behavior of his fellow conservatives across the country.”
Yes, it is. Or at least it was, right up until last week.
Mick Mulvaney, a former congressman from South Carolina, is a contributor to NewsNation. He served as director of the Office of Management and Budget, acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and White House chief of staff under President Donald Trump.
Date: | |
Tag: | Donald Trump |
Filter
-
17 states sue over rule entitling workers to some abortion accommodations
Republican attorneys general from 17 states have filed a lawsuit challenging a rule entitling workers to some abortion accommodations, alleging the regulation adopted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is in overreach. The ...The Hill - Politics - Abortion -
PEN America Has Stood By Authors. They Should Stand By PEN.
PEN America needs to ensure more than one point of view is heard on even the most contentious issue.The New York Times - Top stories -
Corrections & Amplifications
Corrections & Amplifications for the edition of April 27, 2024.The Wall Street Journal - World -
‘This will be a little bit worse than a normal correction’: April’s stock-market selloff isn’t over yet
Technical analysts Ralph Acampora, Larry Williams and Vance Howard see market weakness ahead.MarketWatch - Business -
Supreme Court Weighs Emergency Abortions in States Where Procedure Is Banned
Justices considered whether federal law permits emergency-room doctors to perform abortions to preserve a woman’s health even in states that outlaw the procedure.The Wall Street Journal - World - Abortion -
Arizona state House passes bill to repeal 1864 abortion ban after several failed attempts
Arizona lawmakers will again attempt to repeal a near-total ban on abortion from 1864 that was upheld by the state Supreme Court earlier this month.NBC News - Top stories - Abortion -
Supreme Court decision on Idaho abortion ban could affect other states
A case before the U.S. Supreme Court on Idaho's near-total abortion ban could impact what demands the federal government can impose on hospitals in other states. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson breaks down how Moyle v. United States ...CBS News - Top stories - Abortion -
Arizona house votes to repeal state’s near-total ban on abortion
Three Republicans join Democrats to support repeal of law first approved in 1864, with measure now heading to state senate. Lawmakers in the Arizona house have voted to repeal a controversial 1864 law banning nearly all abortions, amid mounting ...The Guardian - World - Abortion -
Effort to repeal Arizona abortion law heads to state Senate
Arizona lawmakers moved forward Wednesday in their efforts to repeal a Civil War-era law that bans all abortions except to save the woman's life. CBS News campaign reporter Shawna Mizelle has the details.CBS News - Top stories - Abortion -
Abortion Data Wars: States and Cities Debate How Much Information to Collect
Some states with Republican-controlled legislatures want more data, while some controlled by Democrats want less, fearing it could be used to target patients or providers.The New York Times - Health - Abortion
More from The Hill
-
Riot police drag away protesters at University of Texas as Gaza tensions flare
State troopers in riot gear moved on Monday afternoon to clear out students attempting to occupy a quad at the University of Texas at Austin. Dozens of protesters were arrested on site, escalating tensions that began on Wednesday when the ...The Hill - Politics -
Jill Stein accuses police of assaulting her at protest
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on Sunday alleged police assaulted her and other demonstrators shortly before being arrested at a pro-Palestinian protest on the campus of Washington University in St. Louis. “Basically, the police ...The Hill - Politics -
US finds Israeli military units violated human rights
Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story US finds Israeli military units violated human rights The State Department has determined that at least five Israeli ...The Hill - Politics - Israel -
Evening Report — Protests continue to spread on college campuses
A quick recap of the day and what to look forward to tomorrow {beacon} Evening Report © AP Pro-Palestinian protests escalate on college campuses Hundreds of students have been arrested on college campuses across the country as ...The Hill - Politics -
FCC fines wireless carriers
Presented by Microsoft — {beacon} Technology Technology PRESENTED BY The Big Story FCC fines major mobile carriers $200M The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a fine totaling $200 million to the nation’s four largest mobile ...The Hill - Politics