Moderators or manipulators? Blame CNN for the big debate debacle.
Four people were on the CNN debate stage Thursday evening. Two have a chance to be elected president in November. The two others — the event’s moderators — apparently felt compelled to insert themselves into the limelight as well.
That’s a major problem today for televised political debates: Journalists expect to be part of the show.
Moderators are not content simply to raise topics and operate stopwatches. They love to show how enterprising and important they can be on the big political stage. And CNN’s moderators, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, were no different, caving to the temptation of trying to steer the political dialogue according to their journalistic instincts.
Journalists, by their nature, are accustomed to probing, challenging and even grilling newsmakers. But that approach is only suitable for one-on-one interviews, not political campaign forums, when the candidates are right there to do their own interrogations of each other. Once the moderators start to inject themselves into the debate, they are wide open to accusations of bias.
Tapper and Bash, of course, are veteran journalists. They each anchor news shows on CNN. They co-host a weekend public affairs interview show. So, on one level, it is understandable that they would adhere to their journalistic inclinations, turning what is supposed to be a debate between two candidates into dueling press conferences. The problem is that this approach becomes rather unmanageable and diminishes the focus from being solely on the candidates.
No doubt the Tapper and Bash team had a tall task at Thursday’s debate, and it is worth noting that the forum didn’t go totally down a ravine, as happened in 2020, or even in the Donald Trump- Hillary Clinton clashes in 2016. The moderators kept general order, managed time limits, and maintained their poise even when the candidates didn’t. It certainly helped that the production format allowed for keeping a candidate’s microphone muted when he wasn’t speaking. That new practice stifled impromptu interactions, but was probably needed, given the mercurial temperaments of the debaters.
But the moderators spent too much time on long-winded questions that were set up with factoids and premises. They ran with a grocery list approach to the topics raised, trying to cover way more territory than could sensibly be covered in 90 minutes. All public opinion polls show that the economy is No. 1 on prospective voters’ minds, but Tapper and Bash limited discussion of the economy to a single round at the outset of the debate.
Many of the topics raised played to the advantage of one candidate or the other, most seeming to favor President Biden. The questions on abortion, January 6, the climate crisis, destroying democracy and child care were all in the Biden wheelhouse. That he failed to capitalize off such softballs doesn’t excuse the moderators for trying to pave the way. Political debate questions should be framed in a manner that provides an equal challenge to each candidate, but Tapper and Bash failed to craft such questions.
The forum went off the rails at various times, with candidate insults, references to a porn star, claims about golf scores, and even more insults reducing the discussion to a barroom argument. The nation really doesn’t want to hear another quarrel about the “suckers and losers” claims of yesteryear. Biden and Trump bear the blame for such diminished dialogue, but the moderators allowed the nonsense to continue, apparently forgetting they controlled the mute buttons on the microphones.
Both Biden and Trump boldly ignored direct questions at times, particularly as the debate droned on. Trump filibustered the climate change and child care topics. Biden detoured from a question about age concerns to somehow talk about South Korea and Samsung. Again, Tapper and Bash can hardly control such evasions, but on the other hand, they were the ones supposedly managing the playing field.
Given what Americans already knew about the flaws of the presidential candidates on the stage, it was clear that the journalists trying to moderate an evening of chaos had a tall task, indeed. Perhaps it was an impossible chore to wrangle and control these unpolished candidates, who will never go down in American history as great orators. The result of the debate was a bizarre and unimpressive demonstration of political rhetoric at its worst. And there was little indication that the next debate — if it ever happens — has even the slightest chance of being better.
Maybe the next debate should just remove moderators from the picture altogether. A verbal brawl just featuring the two candidates exchanging barbs and insults would hardly be worse than what was witnessed in Atlanta on Thursday.
Jeffrey M. McCall is a media critic and professor of communication at DePauw University. He has worked as a radio news director, a newspaper reporter and as a political media consultant.
Date: |
Filter
-
ABC News - Entertainment
How did CNN's moderators do in the Biden-Trump debate? It almost didn't matter that they were there
It almost didn't seem to matter that CNN's Dana Bash and Jake Tapper were on stage for the much-awaited presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump -
NBC News - Top stories
First presidential debate: Hosted by CNN
Watch live coverage as President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump square off in the first presidential debate, hosted by CNN. -
Financial Times - Business
Joe Biden tries to calm nerves of wealthy backers after debate debacle
President met with Democratic donors amid calls for him to step aside over concerns about his fitnessJoe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Democrats fret about hit to Senate chances after Biden debate debacle
Democrats are worried President Biden's dismal debate performance could doom any slim chance the party has for holding its Senate majority by further depressing turnout in critical battleground states. Democrats were already in a tough electoral ...Joe Biden -
Financial Times - Business
Anger mounts at Biden’s inner circle after debate debacle
Democratic insiders alarmed by advisers’ reluctance to consider president’s exit from White House raceJoe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Sununu blames 'Democratic elite' for Biden's poor debate performance
New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) took a swipe at the "Democratic elite" in an interview Friday, blaming those in leadership for President Biden's poor performance in the recent debate. Sununu highlighted the Democratic National Committee's ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Trump lauds debate moderators at rally: ‘They treated me very fairly’
Former President Trump said at a rally Friday that he thought CNN’s presidential debate moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, treated him “very fairly” on Thursday night. “I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very ...Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Brian Stelter: Voters criticizing debate moderators upset over disappointment with Biden
Former CNN anchor Brian Stelter said voters who are criticizing the moderators from Thursday’s debate for not fact-checking are just “disappointed” and “frustrated” with President Joe Biden’s performance. "Why are these people complaining about it ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Cohen criticizes Biden, debate moderators for avoiding Trump conviction talk
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen criticized the presidential debate moderators and President Biden for avoiding talking about former President Trump’s conviction. Cohen joined MSNBC’s Ali Velshi on Saturday to discuss Biden’s performance. He ...Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Ty Cobb on Sotomayor dissent: 'A lot of screaming and no analysis'
Former Trump White House attorney Ty Cobb criticized Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent on the high court's presidential immunity ruling, calling it a "little hysterical." "So, I thought her dissent was a little hysterical, and it ... -
The Hill - Politics
Trump seeks to set aside hush money verdict after immunity ruling: source
Former President Trump on Monday asked his hush money judge to set aside the recent guilty verdict after the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, according to a person familiar with the matter. The Supreme Court provided former presidents with a broad ...Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
DNC rolls out ad campaign in swing state newspapers calling Trump 'a threat to our democracy'
The Democratic National Committee is rolling out a new ad campaign against former president Donald Trump in major swing state newspapers on Tuesday, labeling him as a "fraud," "liar," denier," and "a threat to our democracy." The ad campaign, ...Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Johnson dismisses Democratic 'hyperbole' over immunity ruling: 'It's madness'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Monday shrugged off Democrats' concern over the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, calling their fears of future presidential criminality "madness." "Look, there's all sorts of hyperbole ... -
The Hill - Politics
July 4 may bring 'dangerous heat' to these areas of US
The National Weather Service (NWS) is warning of “persistent, dangerous heat” for much of the week, especially in the southern and southwestern parts of the country. The “early July heat wave” is expected in the Southern Plains, Gulf Coast, ...