Misinterpret Iran’s signals of restraint at your peril
Iran launched two retaliatory strikes against Israel in the wake of the Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus on April 1 and the assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, and IRGC General Abbas Nilforoushan in Beirut on Sept. 27. The strikes resulted in limited damage and no Israeli casualties, with many of its missiles and drones intercepted by Israeli and allied air defenses. Israeli and U.S. officials have widely celebrated these outcomes as evidence of their superior military capabilities and advanced missile defense systems. U.S. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan concluded that the Iran retaliation in October as “defeated and ineffective.”
This is an attractive self-congratulatory narrative that plays into entrenched beliefs among some security experts of Western military technological supremacy. However, this interpretation is a dangerous misreading of the situation. My own research on the revenge cycle in international crisis suggests an alternative explanation: Iran's low impact responses are not a reflection of incapacity, but an intentional escalation management strategy designed to limit damage to Israel and prevent a vengeful escalatory spiral into regional war.
No matter how much Israel and the U.S. attempt to downplay the military significance of Iran's retaliation, emerging evidence suggests that the second response in October was more successful than initially appeared and suggests Iran possesses the capability to inflict significant damage.
Reports indicate that Iranian missiles hit several IDF targets despite Israel's layered missile defense systems. Satellite images of the Nevatim Airbase, where the Israel Defense Force's F-35 fleet is stationed, reveal as many as 30 missile impacts, challenging the narrative of Iran's military ineffectiveness. And based on U.S. estimates, even before the escalation of regional tensions in October 2023, Tehran already possesses over 3,000 ballistic missiles that can threaten Israel, U.S. assets and oil production in the region, so additional Iranian strikes of similar or greater magnitude remain possible.
A more likely explanation for the limited impact of Iran’s retaliatory strikes is that its leadership is instead engaged in a strategy of intentional escalation management. Iran has utilized both back-channel communications and public messaging to choreograph its retaliation methods and targets. By allowing Israel and its allies to prepare and evacuate, Iran minimizes casualties while still demonstrating its resolve to strike back. This is a retaliatory strategy long used by Iran since the assassination of IRGC General Qasem Soleimani to keep limited conflicts from boiling over.
Second, the significant delays between the Israeli assassinations and Iran's retaliatory strikes have allowed Israel and its allies ample time to deploy defensive measures. Despite facing domestic pressure to exact swift revenge, the Iranian leadership has chosen to delay its responses rather than follow the domestic political expediency of immediate retaliation. This delay should be interpreted as a costly signal of restraint.
Third, although some political leaders may label Iran's retaliation as indiscriminate, the evidence suggests otherwise. Iran has deliberately avoided civilian targets, focusing on military installations. This targeting strategy is likely aimed at reducing the Israeli civilian casualties and subsequent public desire for revenge and preventing further escalation.
The domestic sentiment in Iran undeniably compels its leaders to take retaliatory actions, both as a matter of revenge and to support allies within the "axis of resistance." Tehran is acutely aware that low-casualty outcomes could be perceived as signs of military weakness, especially after its April retaliation. Yet, Iranian leaders continue to employ a consistent strategy of restraint, fully cognizant of the potential for military embarrassment. This willingness to risk appearing weak is itself a costly signal of their intent to de-escalate tensions.
A strategy of restraint only works if both sides are committed escalation control. If Israel and the United States wish to control escalation, a wise course of action would be for Israel to reciprocate Iran's restraint with proportional responses against military targets, avoiding escalation toward oil fields and nuclear facilities. The U.S. should leverage its influence to persuade its Israeli ally to exercise restraint.
If, however, Israel and its allies consistently respond to Iranian restraint with escalation, Tehran will have no choice but to conclude that Israel and the U.S. attach little value to peace. This could leave Iran with no option but to resort to more drastic deterrent measures, including crossing the threshold of acquiring nuclear capabilities — an outcome well within Iran’s reach and precisely what policymakers in Washington and Tel Aviv are seeking to prevent.
X Zhang is a social science and humanities international security fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University.
Date: |
-
Top stories - CBS News
Deadly strikes at Gaza hospital as Israel potentially signals Iran attack response
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly signaled a potential response to Iran's missile attacks. This comes as more details emerge about an Israeli attack at a Gaza hospital. CBS ...5 days ago - Israel -
Politics - The Hill
Strike on Netanyahu home 'a signal' Iran proxies not incapacitated, expert says
A recent drone strike targeting the home of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is sending "a signal" that Iran-backed militant groups are not "incapacitated," despite losing senior ...Yesterday - Iran -
World - The Guardian
Yahya Sinwar’s death raises ceasefire hopes and is a ‘moment of justice’ says Biden – Middle East crisis live
US president tells Netanyahu ‘let’s make this moment an opportunity to seek a path to peace, a better future in Gaza without Hamas’. At least 28 people have been killed in an Israeli airstrike on a ...2 days ago - Joe Biden -
Politics - The Hill
The West must offer an ultimatum to Iran: Free your people or face attack
With its recent missile attack on Israel, Iran has stoked more tension and danger in the Middle East, but it has also given Israel and the West the opportunity to obtain the ultimate security ...2 days ago -
Business - Financial Times
The power and the perils of Trump’s ‘flow state’
The former president’s latest town hall was a spectacle even by the standards of modern American politics18 hours ago - Donald Trump -
World - The Guardian
Of course teenagers want to be pop idols like Liam Payne. Given the perils, should we let them? | Martha Gill
The singer is the latest casualty of an industry that thrusts fame on children too young to cope. Sex, drinking, smoking, gambling, joining the army, being put to work – we now take it as obvious ...Yesterday -
World - Yahoo News
Iran country profile
6 days ago - Iran -
Business - Financial Times
Reeves signals business taxes will rise in Budget
Chancellor says companies understand government must make ‘difficult decisions’ to balance books6 days ago
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Trump and Harris campaigns spotlight religion in recent appeals to Christian voters
Former President Trump and Vice President Harris have focused on religion in recent days as they make their final appeals to Christian voters just weeks before the election. Thursday night’s Al ...45 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Fox News host pushes back on Trump’s false Springfield claims
Fox News’s Howard Kurtz pushed back on former President Trump’s claims about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, during an interview Sunday. “Your famous line about Springfield, Ohio, and I take your ...50 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Here's what to do if you lose an absentee ballot before Election Day
While misplacing a ballot can be stressful, there are still ways to make sure your vote is counted.1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
Republicans head to court in expanding battle about overseas ballots
Overseas voting has become the latest battlefront in Republicans’ legal challenges leading up to the election. Judges in two crucial battleground states, Michigan and Pennsylvania, this week heard ...1 hour ago - Republican Party -
Politics - The Hill
Lawler: Rhetoric about Trump-related fascism 'needs to stop'
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said the rhetoric about former President Trump and fascism hurts other Republicans and “needs to stop.” Lawler joined CBS News's “Face the Nation” on Sunday morning to ...2 hours ago - Donald Trump
Latest in Politics
-
Politics - The Hill
Trump and Harris campaigns spotlight religion in recent appeals to Christian voters
Former President Trump and Vice President Harris have focused on religion in recent days as they make their final appeals to Christian voters just weeks before the election. Thursday night’s Al ...45 minutes ago - Donald Trump -
Politics - The Hill
Fox News host pushes back on Trump’s false Springfield claims
Fox News’s Howard Kurtz pushed back on former President Trump’s claims about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, during an interview Sunday. “Your famous line about Springfield, Ohio, and I take your ...50 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Here's what to do if you lose an absentee ballot before Election Day
While misplacing a ballot can be stressful, there are still ways to make sure your vote is counted.1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
Republicans head to court in expanding battle about overseas ballots
Overseas voting has become the latest battlefront in Republicans’ legal challenges leading up to the election. Judges in two crucial battleground states, Michigan and Pennsylvania, this week heard ...1 hour ago - Republican Party -
Politics - NBC News
'What kind of country do we want to live in?' Harris asks congregation
During remarks at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Ga., Vice President Kamala Harris encouraged congregants to vote.1 hour ago