Memo to podcasters: Free speech does not justify promoting antisemitism

Joe Rogan, America’s most popular podcaster, recently hosted Darryl Cooper, a Holocaust revisionist and pseudo-historian known for defending Nazi Germany. For almost three hours, Rogan gave Cooper a platform to defend Hitler, downplay the Holocaust and even joined Cooper in describing the current surge in antisemitism as mere Jewish “overreaction.”

This came just weeks after Rogan similarly let “independent researcher” Ian Carroll spew antisemitic diatribes about Jewish world domination. Comedian Theo Von, another massively popular podcaster, this month gave far-right activist Candace Owens a platform to spread antisemitic conspiracy theories about a worldwide Jewish pedophile ring.

With all this coming after Tucker Carlson openly defended Iran and Qatar — just months after hosting Cooper himself and Vladimir Putin — it is painfully clear that conservative media has declined since the days of William F. Buckley.

Contemporary media influencers gain attention by courting controversy. Figures like Carlson and Rogan build their brands by showcasing inflammatory figures who make dangerously a b surd statements, justify atrocities or simply shill for hostile foreign governments. When criticized, these figures rarely take responsibility, instead claiming they are just “asking questions” or “engaging different views.” When challenged, they and their supporters cry “censorship” or “cancel culture” before digging in their heels.

However they see themselves, provocateurs like Rogan and Carlson aren’t free speech warriors. Their platforming of extremism is not morally neutral. The First Amendment guarantees protection from government censorship, but it doesn’t absolve individuals from using their platforms responsibly — and it certainly does not compel the public to listen.

It’s not censorship for private citizens to guard and govern public discourse — it’s responsible citizenship. When podcasters invoke free speech rights to justify platforming vicious thoughts, they trade on the social contract of self-governance that keeps that right safe from government intervention. But individuals have a responsibility to oppose harmful ideas and to call for their removal from public discourse.

It is laughable to argue that “just asking questions” or “having discussions” about harmful ideas has no impact on their prevalence. Parents of toddlers knows that entertaining an idea invites its recurrence. To engage in “discussions” with a toddler who demands that his or her dinner consist only of Oreos would signal the possibility of a future Oreo dinner. In the same way, “asking questions” that amplify extreme and vicious ideas merely normalizes extremism and false information in society.

Research demonstrates that repeated exposure to false or extreme claims, even those framed as mere speculation, makes people perceive those claims as more plausible or true. Thus, by uncritically presenting inflammatory views, figures like Rogan, Carlson and Von are not simply “having conversations” — they are reinforcing and legitimizing harmful ideas, especially when they describe these ideas as “nuanced” or “comprehensive,” as Rogan did to Cooper. This shifts the “Overton window” toward making antisemitism, and other forms of extremism, mainstream.

Podcasting is a newer medium, but normalizing extremism under the guise of “just asking questions” is an old trick. Indeed, George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party, employed it over six decades ago. He said, “If you are denied some of the facts or if the facts are twisted or misrepresented then you cannot possibly guide the ship of state.” The “facts” Rockwell referred to were the same antisemitic libels featured on Rogan’s and Von’s shows — to say nothing of Rockwell’s equally repugnant beliefs about other minorities. Just as a responsible parent should not entertain their toddlers’ unhealthy dietary preferences, a responsible citizen should not entertain the normalization of hateful extremism.

This isn’t to say that good-faith discussions about controversial topics cannot occur. There are countless examples of difficult and even painful discussions exploring different sides of an issue, even ones as fraught as antisemitism.

However, there’s a distinction between genuine discourse and uncritically platforming extremism. Rogan, Von and their crowd have done the latter. Simply nodding along, as Rogan and Von did while their guests made claims about secret Jewish control of America is not a “conversation,” and it most certainly is not “asking questions.” It is a passive endorsement of Jew hatred.

Furthermore, platforming these claims has real-world consequences. Owens and her antisemitic conspiracies — the same ones she advanced on Von’s podcast — were explicitly referenced by a school shooter in Nashville, who said Owens motivated him “above all” in his pursuit of “violence and extremism.” If thought leaders wish to claim they are simply “having conversations,” then they must either call out extremism or refuse to platform it.

However, media figures aren’t solely responsible for which ideas take root in society. Influence and popularity — and thus social power — is granted by those who choose to listen. This means that even if we can’t stop Rogan from giving Cooper three hours to spew Holocaust denial to an audience of millions, we can choose not to join that audience, not even by “hate-watching” or “hate-listening.”

As the adage goes, there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Such figures as Rogan, Von and Owens know how to turn outrage into influence, just as George Lincoln Rockwell did decades ago. Attention, even negative attention, grows their influence. Thus, listeners are ultimately responsible for the spread of extremism and lies.

Free speech is a right that implies responsibility. The First Amendment protects against government censorship, but it doesn’t compel anyone to platform extremism, nor does it absolve audiences of examining the consequences of their consumption. Viewers and listeners must hold media figures accountable for what they platform.

Refusing to engage with hateful, extremist nonsense isn’t censorship. It is the bare minimum for responsible citizenship, and no amount of crying “cancel culture” can change that.

Dr. Aaron Pomerantz is a social psychologist and research fellow at Rice University’s Doerr Institute for New Leaders and a Middle East Peace fellow with Young Voices.

Topics

U.S. support for free speech drops by 3%, survey finds

A new survey released Monday by the nonpartisan think tank Future of Free Speech found a 3% drop in support for free speech in the U.S., which puts America's rank at number 9 out of the 33 ...
CBS News - 4d
Are Trump’s campus funding cuts an attack or a defense of free speech?

What critics fail to acknowledge is that there are dangers to free speech on both sides — in inaction as well as overreaction.
The Hill - Mar. 13
Sydney caravan a ‘fake terrorism plot’ and antisemitic attacks a scheme to divert police resources, authorities allege

‘The caravan plot was an elaborate scheme contrived by organised criminals domestically and from offshore,’ AFP deputy commissioner Krissy Barrett says. Get our breaking news email , free app ...
The Guardian - Mar. 10
Ann Coulter questions arrest of Columbia protester on free speech grounds

Conservative media pundit Ann Coulter on Monday questioned the arrest of a pro-Palestinian advocate on free speech grounds. "There's almost no one I don't want to deport, but unless they've ...
The Hill - Mar. 10
Ex-Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil hearing expected to focus on free speech

Former Columbia University student and pro-Palestinin activist Mahmoud Khalil’s hearing in Manhattan federal court on Wednesday is expected to focus on free speech. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ...
The Hill - Mar. 12
Detroit Lions Podcast: Breaking down free agency moves and Detroit's rule change proposals

The latest episode of the Detroit Lions Podcast breaks down recent free agency moves, who's left on FA market, and the Lions' rule change proposals
Yahoo Sports - 1d
Mahmoud Khalil case 'not about free speech': Rubio

Secretary of State Marco Rubio knocked the notion that Mahmoud Khalil’s federal court case is about First Amendment rights but rather his legal standing to remain in the U.S. after he led ...
The Hill - Mar. 12
How antisemitism avoided the fate of antiracism | Jeff Melnick and Jessie Lee Rubin

The promotion of Israel’s national narrative remains exempt from Trump’s wholesale attack on DEI. On 7 March, the Trump administration announced that it had cancelled $400m in federal grants and ...
The Guardian - 5d
Frontier Airlines offers free checked bags promotion in swipe at Southwest

Budget carrier Frontier Airlines is offering free checked luggage and economy bundles that come with seat assignments and carry-on bags.
CNBC - 3d
This Is the Greatest Threat to Free Speech Since the Red Scare

Mahmoud Khalil’s detention is a frightening sign of an authoritarian slide.
The New York Times - Mar. 10
There can be no ‘Israel exception’ for free speech | Kenneth Roth

Trump should reverse his misguided effort to deport Mahmoud Khalil. The Trump administration’s threatened deportation of Mahmoud Khalil seems to reflect a dangerous disregard for freedom of ...
The Guardian - Mar. 14
Cardinals free agency grades, reactions, recaps

Jess Root and Seth Cox react to the Cardinals' moves in free agency in the latest edition of the podcast.
Yahoo Sports - Mar. 14
‘Everybody does it’: Why we all love a good gossip, from The White Lotus, to books and podcasts

Sharing secrets is a natural human instinct – and the boom in audio is providing new platforms for the juiciest stories. In the latest series of The White Lotus , childhood best friends Laurie, ...
The Guardian - 6d
Frontier Airlines offers free checked bags promotion in swipe at Southwest

Frontier Airlines took a swipe at Southwest Airlines’ plan to start charging for seat assignments and checked luggage by doing the opposite.
NBC News - 3d
The Tell-All Book That Facebook Doesn’t Want You to Read

The “free speech” champion Mark Zuckerberg tries to shut up a critic.
The New York Times - 3d
The real history of free speech — from supreme ideal to poisonous politics

The 300-year-old doctrine is being tested by the excesses of digital oligarchs, says historian Fara Dabhoiwala
Financial Times - 6d
The US assault on free speech is not going to end with Mahmoud Khalil

The significance of the Trump administration’s arrest and threat to deport the Palestinian activist cannot be overstated. It’s 2027 and you’re doom-scrolling in your apartment while eating a single ...
The Guardian - 6d
Wikimedia challenges India content takedown, warns of chilling effect on free speech

Yahoo News - 3d
How the G.O.P. Went From Championing Campus Free Speech to Fighting It

President Trump and state politicians are pushing new laws and policies that crack down on curriculum, protests and speakers.
The New York Times - 1d
What to Know About Colleges Offering Free Tuition

Dozens of schools say they provide free tuition to students whose families earn under a certain income. How does it work?
The New York Times - 4d
How Much Does the Carabao Cup Really Matter to Liverpool’s Season

How Important is the Carabao Cup Final for Liverpool?As Liverpool prepare to face Newcastle in the Carabao Cup final, the Big Decisions podcast on Anfield Index saw Davis Davis and Trev Downey ...
Yahoo Sports - Mar. 14
ESPN analyst believes UNC win doesn't justify them in tournament still

ESPN analyst Seth Greenberg believes that UNC basketball's win over San Diego State doesn't justify anything yet.
Yahoo Sports - 2d
There's A Free Game To Grab On Steam Today

As a special 24-hour promotion, developer Lucid 11 is offering Party Club for free on Steam , with the price rising to $16 afterward. There is also a special in-game outfit that players can unlock ...
GameSpot - 4d
Jacksonville Jaguars roster outlook at first wave of NFL free agency

After making nine free agent signings, what does the Jacksonville Jaguars roster now look like?
Yahoo Sports - 4d
Jaguars OL depth chart after Fred Johnson free agent signing

With the Jaguars reportedly signing free agent Fred Johnson, what does the offensive line depth chart now look like?
Yahoo Sports - 2d
Conservatives claim to be fighting antisemitism. Don’t believe them.

Conservative Christians are pushing themselves to the front of the fight against antisemitism and claiming, in essence, to be better Jews than the Jews themselves.
The Hill - 4d
Chase Young must change this trend to justify his big Saints contract

Chase Young was one of the NFL's leaders in QB pressures, but didn't register many sacks. He needs to finish plays to justify his new contract.
Yahoo Sports - Mar. 14
The Bearcat Tip Off Talk Podcast: Cole Baughman

The Bearcat Tip Off Talk Podcast: Cole Baughman
Yahoo Sports - Mar. 14
Indianapolis Colts roster outlook after first wave of NFL free agent signings

After the first wave of NFL free agency, what does the Indianapolis Colts roster outlook currently look like?
Yahoo Sports - 4d
Free online virtual reality tool helps people tackle public speaking nerves

Cambridge scientist behind VR platform says it could help those put off by high cost of speech anxiety treatment. A free online platform that allows speakers to practise in front of thousands of ...
The Guardian - 6d
Australia cops say apparent antisemitic terror wave was a "criminal con"

Australian police say a wave of seemingly antisemitic attacks and threats was really a "fabricated terrorist plot, essentially a criminal con job."
CBS News - Mar. 10
Transportation secretary rescinds Biden memos prioritizing infrastructure resilience to climate change

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy rescinded memos from the Biden administration prioritizing infrastructure resilience to climate change, according to a Monday press release. According to the ...
The Hill - Mar. 10
The left talks about antisemitism. The right actually fights it.

A Republican consulting firm has helped build a department to fight antisemitism and support Israel, while the Democratic Party has failed to crack down on pro-Hamas mobs and has defended a Hamas ...
The Hill - 5d
The founding fathers baked reason, truth and free speech into the US. That’s all gone now | Will Hutton

Donald Trump’s actions go against the Enlightenment values that gave rise to the constitution. His might-is-right politics have nothing to offer Britain. The founding fathers of the USA – James ...
The Guardian - Mar. 9
Supreme Court takes up free speech challenge to conversion therapy bans aimed at LGBTQ youth

The Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to law in Colorado that bans “conversion therapy” aimed at teens questioning their sexual orientation or gender identity.
NBC News - Mar. 10
Threaten campuses, shut down debate: that’s what free speech looks like under Trump | Owen Jones

The president has slashed $400m in funding from Columbia University. He wants to stifle criticism of Israel – but the real target is dissent. For those who fear Donald Trump is a despot in the ...
The Guardian - Mar. 11
Mahmoud Khalil lawyers say activist being punished for free speech as hundreds protest against detention – live

Actor Susan Sarandon among demonstrators calling for pro-Palestinian activist’s release outside New York courthouse. Government asks court to move Khalil case out of New York Who is Mahmoud ...
The Guardian - Mar. 12
Is the case against pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil about immigration or free speech?

Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil's lawyers were in court to argue against his deportation. CBS News' Katrina Kaufman has more on the legal proceedings and how the case may involve two ...
CBS News - Mar. 12
Amazing: of all the books in all the world Mr Free Speech Zuckerberg wants to ban, it’s the one about him | Marina Hyde

Whether the Meta boss and his ex-lieutenant Sheryl Sandberg are truly beyond awful is neither here nor there. I thought he was done with factchecking. I am as shocked as I am confused that Mark ...
The Guardian - Mar. 14