Massive defense bill sees clear path in Senate, despite transgender measure
![Massive defense bill sees clear path in Senate, despite transgender measure](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/schumerchuck_murraypatty_092424gn01_w.jpg?w=900)
The Senate is on track to vote on the country’s massive annual defense spending bill Wednesday, with signs that it will pass smoothly despite Democratic objections to language involving transgender care for minors and its massive $895.2 billion top line.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which easily passed the House last week, is scheduled for a floor debate Wednesday, after a vote to invoke cloture planned for late Monday.
All signs point to a relatively hiccup-free path ahead, with just days before a deadline to pass an overall government funding measure or contend with a potential government shutdown ahead of Christmas.
Still, there are Democrats in the upper chamber displeased with the bill, with at least a dozen senators expected to oppose it.
Among them are Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley, (D-Ore.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.) Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), with the latter saying Wednesday the bloated bill is being placed ahead of bigger priorities such as health care, housing and feeding Americans.
“Mr. President, most Americans would agree that we need a strong military. I certainly do. But we do not need a defense system that is designed to make huge profits for a handful of giant defense contractors while providing less of what the country needs,” Sanders said in remarks on the Senate floor.
“We do not need to spend almost a trillion dollars on the military, while half a million Americans are homeless, children go hungry and elderly people are unable to afford to heat their homes in the winter.”
The House and Senate earlier this month unveiled their more than 1,800-page compromise version of the NDAA, which includes measures to boost the U.S. presence in the Indo-Pacific, support pay raises for troops, and fund new ships, aircraft and help the defense industrial base.
But the legislation also includes language staunchly rejected by Democrats, including a provision that restricts coverage of gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members; the amendment, the most controversial in the NDAA, stops the Pentagon’s TRICARE health care insurance plan from covering the costs of gender dysphoria treatments for people under the age of 18.
The language, inserted late in the bill’s process at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), was seen by even some Republicans as unnecessary given that President-elect Trump is soon to enter the White House and could administratively order such a ban.
The addition quickly drew condemnation from the left, with pro-LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign accusing Republicans of playing “politics with the healthcare of children of servicemembers.”
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee, said he voted against the NDAA because of the amendment, which he called “pandering to the most extreme elements” of the GOP.
A provision aimed at curtailing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs within the military also made it into the bill and would restrict the Defense Department from creating any new positions related to DEI for a year.
Despite opposition from liberal Democrats and some apprehension from Republicans, the NDAA passed out of the House in a bipartisan 281-140 vote, with 81 Democrats voting in favor of it.
More than 40 Democratic and independent senators signed a letter calling to “keep the FY25 appropriations bills free of any new poison pill policy riders,” including those that “severely restrict access to gender-affirming care.”
But it’s unclear if that many will vote against the bill over the provision. The letter was led by Merkley and fellow Democratic Sens. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), and Cory Booker (N.J.).
The NDAA lays out defense policy and sets funding goals, but a defense appropriations bill must be passed along with it to actually provide the money.
“Dangerous poison pill provisions like those included in the FY25 House appropriations bills will severely undermine Congress’ ability to push forward must-pass legislation and keep the government open and working for the American people,” the lawmakers write. “As such, we urge you to reject these extremist riders from the final FY25 appropriations bills.”
Seen as must-pass legislation, the NDAA has been signed into law every year for the past six decades.
Besides the culture war amendments, the bill has multiple bipartisan measures, including the establishment of a Taiwan fund similar to a Ukraine initiative that allows the U.S. to send arms to the country by purchasing directly from private industry, and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all service members.
The defense bill would also allocate funds to build seven new warships, about 200 aircraft and more than 300 vehicles.
Topics
-
Senate advances annual defense policy bill, teeing up final vote in coming days
The Senate on Monday cleared a key procedural hurdle toward passing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), teeing up a final vote in the coming days before Congress wraps up its work for ...The Hill - 31m -
Democratic senators introduce defense bill amendment to block GOP transgender restriction
A large group of Democratic senators introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Monday that would ensure the right for the children of servicemembers to access ...The Hill - 31m -
Democratic senators seek to ax transgender care ban from defense bill
Fourteen Democratic senators will introduce an amendment to remove language from Congress’ defense spending bill that seeks to ban coverage of gender-affirming care for trans children of ...NBC News - 2h -
Massive annual defense policy bill passes in House
{beacon} Welcome to The Hill's Defense & NatSec newsletter {beacon} Defense &National Security Defense &National Security The Big Story Massive annual defense policy bill passes in House The ...The Hill - 4d -
House Passes Defense Bill Denying Transgender Health Coverage for Minors
The $895 billion measure was approved over the opposition of most Democrats, who rejected a provision inserted by Republicans to deny the coverage to the minor children of military personnel.The New York Times - 5d -
House passes massive defense bill with ban on gender-affirming care for transgender kids
The House passed a massive defense bill that includes a ban on gender-affirming care for children of servicemembers despite opposition from Democrats.NBC News - 5d -
Military with transgender connections see NDAA provision as ‘slap in the face’
Military veterans, families and active-duty service members with transgender children say a provision added to Congress’s annual defense policy bill targeting some medical treatments for trans ...The Hill - 5d -
How Trump's team views Hegseth's chances of clearing Senate process
President-elect Donald Trump's team is still projecting confidence over his pick for secretary of defense, former news host Pete Hegseth. CBS News' Libby Cathey reports.CBS News - 6d -
GOP senators push to take out provision in defense bill to draft women in military
Eight Republican senators sent a letter to the top negotiators for the annual defense bill asking them to take out a provision that would require women to register for the Selective Service System ...The Hill - Dec. 5
More from The Hill
-
Senate advances annual defense policy bill, teeing up final vote in coming days
The Hill - 31m -
Democratic senators introduce defense bill amendment to block GOP transgender restriction
The Hill - 31m -
Terrorism victims push Congress on relief funding
The Hill - 37m -
Attacking Newsom’s climate agenda, environmental activists launch ad campaign in battleground states
The Hill - 39m -
Trump works to ease RFK Jr. worries
The Hill - 45m