Many are called: The jury’s verdict on the death of Jordan Neely

When a New York jury acquitted Daniel Penny in the killing of Jordan Neely, it didn’t give us an answer. The jury confronted — and confronted us with — a question: What accommodation does society owe its neuro-diverse members?

Jordan Neely, an agitated, homeless, schizophrenic Black man in crisis, boarded a New York subway F Train, yelling that he had “Had enough.” Some passengers were frightened. Some said Neely threatened them; others denied that.

Daniel Penny, a former Marine from Long Island who was studying architecture, stepped up, put Neely in a chokehold, and maintained that chokehold for approximately six minutes. At the end of this encounter, Neely was dead — killed, according to the Medical Examiner, by Penny’s continued pressure on his throat.

Penny was indicted and tried. Manslaughter charges were dismissed at a mid-point in deadlocked jury deliberations, and the case against Penny was sent back to the jury on the lesser charge of negligent homicide. The jury delivered a verdict of “Not guilty.”

Media responses when the “not guilty” verdict was announced conveyed a sense that they had been long-rehearsed. The case had been covered intensively ever since Neely’s death. Everyone had known that some verdict was coming, and the trial had been reported as a zero-sum contest with one winner and one loser.

Reactions fell into two categories: Either the acquittal amounted to “a green light for white vigilantism,” or it was the resounding vindication of a hero who had protected his neighbors against the forces of disorder.

These takes are both mistaken.

An acquittal in a criminal case states only that the jurors felt a reasonable doubt — that they were unable, in the language of the classic instruction, to arrive at a sense of “moral certainty.” The factual question the Penny jury could not answer affirmatively was whether Penny had taken a risk "of such nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.”

This was not a verdict on the “send the cops or send the social workers” dialectic that dominates the contemporary media debate. In fact, the Penny verdict acknowledged the debate’s inadequacy. The jury apparently took account of the fact that you can send either the cops or the social workers, or both, and still be confronted by harrowing “boundary work” on the scene. You will face in everyday life innumerable interactions when neither the cops nor the social workers are around.

It is hard to think of the Penny case without thinking of Walker Evans’ haunting collection of subway photographs, “Many Are Called” — covert portraits from the subway’s unique zone of solitude-in-public. New Yorkers have always accommodated mental illness in that zone. For years, they accommodated Neeley, whose chronic wanderings had earned him a place on the city’s “Top 50” list of the disruptive mentally ill.

New Yorkers share a tacit understanding, a specialized code that informs what conduct will be ignored, when glances will be averted and verbal objection withheld when space will be ceded and you will move to another car. The grasp of these rules is one of the things that makes you a New Yorker. But is failure to grasp or apply them a crime?

Many are called to face men and women in crisis. Whether and when you are chosen is not up to you. Circumstances chose Penny. His jury did not focus solely on Penny’s conduct at the decisive moments; it widened the lens.

It saw that Penny and Neely were brought together in an encounter that neither man should have been required to manage — that in a safety sense Penny, like an exhausted, undertrained nurse who delivers a fatal overdose of a badly labeled drug in a NICU, was a “second victim.” And it asked what we could expect of each other as reasonable people when these moments arrive.

When we react by angrily attacking the Penny verdict or by self-righteously applauding it, we are taking shelter behind Penny. We are using him to duck the basic question Neely’s death poses: whether, as policing scholar David Thacher puts it, “We should view disability not as a property of individuals with certain impairments but as a property of the society that has failed to accommodate them.”

We should talk about that.

James Doyle is a lawyer and author in Boston.

Topics

Daniel Penny Is Acquitted in Death of Jordan Neely on Subway

Daniel Penny, a former Marine who choked a fellow subway rider on an uptown F train last year, was acquitted on a charge of criminally negligent homicide on Monday, ending a case that had come to ...
The New York Times - 3d
Jordan Neely's family reacts to the Daniel Penny not guilty verdict

There was an audible reaction in the courtroom when the jury in Daniel Penny's trial for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely announced they found the defendant not guilty of criminally negligent ...
CBS News - 4d
'I miss my son': Jordan Neely's father, DA react to Daniel Penny verdict

The Daniel Penny jury will deliberate whether he committed criminally negligent homicide when he placed Jordan Neely in a chokehold on a subway car in May 2023.
ABC News - 4d
Daniel Penny found not guilty in Jordan Neely NYC subway chokehold death

Daniel Penny, the Marine veteran charged for the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, has been found not guilty of criminally negligent homicide. CBS News New York breaks down the verdict with civil ...
CBS News - 4d
Daniel Penny found not guilty in chokehold death of Jordan Neely

Daniel Penny was acquitted Monday of criminally negligent homicide in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man with a history of mental illness whose final moments on a New ...
NBC News - 4d
Daniel Penny found not guilty in subway chokehold death of Jordan Neely

On the fifth day of jury deliberations, Daniel Penny was acquitted of criminally negligent homicide in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway. NBC News' Rehema Ellis reports ...
NBC News - 4d
Family of Missouri teen who fell to his death on Orlando free-fall ride gets $310 million verdict

A Florida jury delivered a $310 million verdict Thursday to the family of Tyre Sampson, the Missouri teenager who plunged to his death on a free-fall ride at an amusement park over two years ago.
NBC News - Dec. 6
Jordan Neely’s Father Sues Daniel Penny, Accusing Him of Assault

Andre Zachery claims that Mr. Penny, who put Mr. Neely in a chokehold on a subway train last year, caused his son’s death through “negligence, carelessness and recklessness.”
The New York Times - Dec. 5
Daniel Penny jury deliberates in chokehold death of Jordan Neely

Jurors have begun deliberations in the chokehold death trial of Daniel Penny, who is accused of killing Jordan Neely on a New York City subway train.
ABC News - Dec. 3