Liz Cheney: Supreme Court should decide Trump immunity quickly so voters can hear Jan. 6 case
Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) on Monday called on the Supreme Court to rule “quickly and decisively” on whether former President Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election — arguments that will be heard before the nation’s high court this coming Thursday.
In an op-ed in The New York Times on Monday, Cheney — who served as vice chair of the committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot — stressed the importance of the federal election fraud indictment against the former president going to trial before the American people decide whether to send him back to the White House this November.
“If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this year, the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed before the grand jury, and our system may never hold the man most responsible for Jan. 6 to account,” Cheney wrote in her Times piece.
Cheney noted that, while the House select committee collected a significant amount testimony against Trump related to his efforts on Jan. 6 — much of which is credited with compelling the Justice Department to launch its own probe — there is still new information and evidence that Cheney said she is sure will be outlined during the federal trial.
“The indictment and public reporting suggest that the special counsel was able to obtain key evidence our committee did not have,” she said, noting it appears Trump’s former White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and former Trump aide Dan Scavino seem to have given evidence to DOJ, while refusing to speak to the committee.
“There is little doubt that Mr. Trump’s closest advisers also gave the federal grand jury minute-to-minute accounts of his malicious conduct on Jan. 6, describing how they repeatedly begged the president to instruct the violent rioters to leave our Capitol and how Mr. Trump refused for several hours to do so as he watched the attack on television,” she wrote. “This historic testimony about a former president’s conduct is likely to remain secret until the special counsel presents his case at trial.”
Cheney stressed that Trump has had access to the federal grand jury material and all the Jan. 6 committee testimony, despite his occasional claims otherwise. She said she thinks Trump is seeking to do what he can to delay the trial until after the November election because he “knows what all these witnesses have said under oath and understands the risks he faces at trial.”
All this evidence, Cheney argued, should be presented in open court so “so that the public can fully assess what Mr. Trump did on Jan. 6 and what a man capable of that type of depravity could do if again handed the awesome power of the presidency.”
“It cannot be that a president of the United States can attempt to steal an election and seize power but our justice system is incapable of bringing him to trial before the next election four years later,” she wrote.
“If Mr. Trump’s tactics prevent his Jan. 6 trial from proceeding in the ordinary course, he will also have succeeded in concealing critical evidence from the American people — evidence demonstrating his disregard for the rule of law, his cruelty on Jan. 6 and the deep flaws in character that make him unfit to serve as president. The Supreme Court should understand this reality and conclude without delay that no immunity applies here.”
Date: | |
Tag: | Donald Trump |
Filter
-
In Super Metroid, No One Can Hear You Scream
Super Metroid recently celebrated its 30-year anniversary. Below, we look back at how it used and helped to create horror game tropes.It begins with a benign pulse over black. An otherworldly synth shriek interrupting. Random shots of dead ...GameSpot - Tech -
Former Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer: ‘Are you kidding? You’ll get more cases than ever!’
The American lawyer on the problem of overturning of Roe vs Wade, the ‘psychological difficulty’ of retirement — and what ‘Macbeth’ tells us about WashingtonFinancial Times - Business -
Democrats alarmed over conservative judges in Trump court cases
Democratic lawmakers are sounding the alarm over what they see as conservative justices and judges tipping the scales in favor of former President Trump in two federal cases. The two cases accuse the former president of attempting to subvert the ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
12:30 Report — Fewer April jobs may bode well for interest rates
{beacon} 12:30 REPORT Happy Friday! This is a weekend full of festivities: The Kentucky Derby is tomorrow, and Cinco de Mayo is on Sunday! Here’s what’s in today’s edition: The U.S. economy added far fewer jobs than expected last month. The Fed ...The Hill - Politics -
White House news briefing: Watch live
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is scheduled to brief reporters on Friday afternoon. The briefing comes after President Biden drew a clear line in a Thursday address between his administration’s support for Israel in its war against ...The Hill - Politics -
Stabilizing crime victims' funding is a win America’s kids desperately need
The act calls attention to the threat facing victims of violent crimes and asks for support to save the fund that offers those victims justice and healing.The Hill - Politics -
Hope Hicks recalls Trump's 2016 campaign in disarray after 'Access Hollywood' tape: Live updates
Former President Trump’s ex-political adviser Hope Hicks has taken the witness stand in his hush money trial in Manhattan on Friday. Hicks, once a close confidant of Trump’s when he ran in 2016 and after he entered the White House, has testified ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
Judge corrects Trump's claim that gag order prevents his testimony
The judge handling former President Trump's hush money case clarified Friday that Trump is allowed to testify during the trial, correcting the former president's assertion a day earlier that a gag order prevented him from doing so. Judge Juan ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump