Lawmakers push Wall Street giveaway disguised as increased worker security
The nation is facing a retirement income crisis. Too many workers will never be able to retire and maintain their standards of living. Employer-sponsored traditional pensions have largely disappeared, replaced with wholly inadequate 401(k)s and other tax-favored individual savings and investment plans.
The solution to the crisis is simple: Expand Social Security. Frustratingly, there are politicians and think tanks that instead want to expand the very individual savings and investment approach that contributed to the crisis. A good example is the Retirement Savings for Americans Act, currently pending in Congress. It would automatically enroll all employees not covered by an employer plan into a savings and investment account with mandatory contributions of 3 percent of wages.
To understand the incomparably superior approach of expanding Social Security over throwing more money, in the form of tax expenditures, at 401(k)s and similar plans, we have to understand the stark difference between retirement insurance and retirement savings.
Social Security is insurance. Those who are insured — working families, in the case of Social Security — pay premiums or insurance contributions (in the case of Social Security, insurance contributions or premiums, required by the Federal Insurance Contributions Act or FICA) to a collective fund out of which benefits are paid when an insured event occurs. In the case of Social Security’s wage insurance, employers match their employees’ contributions dollar for dollar and the insured events triggering payouts are old age, disability or death leaving covered survivors.
In contrast to retirement insurance, in which risks are pooled and the benefits are designed to replace pre-retirement earnings, retirement savings and investment plans such as 401(k)s and similar plans, proposed to be expanded by the pending Retirement Savings for Americans Act plan, pay out whatever happens to be in one’s individual account at retirement. Investment risk is borne completely by individual account holders. Participants are supposed to use that payout to afford the costs of retirement. Those payouts may be totally unrelated to pre-retirement wages.
There are many reasons why retirement savings and investment plans do not provide adequate old age security. If money is lost in a stock market downturn or investments do poorly, say goodbye to a secure retirement. The Wall Street financial services industry skims considerable profits from these accounts. That significantly diminishes payouts. In contrast, Social Security spends less than a penny of every dollar on administration. More than 99 cents is spent on benefits.
Over 40 years’ experience with 401(k) and similar accounts has shown that very few account holders are able to accumulate enough to afford a decent, secure retirement. A dollar contributed to Social Security provides much greater and better economic security than a dollar contributed to these accounts.
Put starkly, our Social Security system benefits contributors. Individual investment and savings accounts primarily benefit the financial services industry that manages and profits off of them.
Notably, if the 3 percent of wages that the Retirement Savings for Americans Act calls for, were instead contributed to Social Security by all employees and employers, Social Security’s projected shortfall would disappear and we could expand benefits substantially. But there is an even better way to pay for an expanded Social Security.
Given the income and wealth inequality of recent decades, we should require the uber-rich to contribute their fair share, rather than increase the FICA rate on low- and middle-income workers. Importantly, a number of bills have been introduced in Congress which greatly expand benefits paid for by requiring millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share.
If members of Congress want to improve retirement security, they should expand Social Security rather than Wall Street-favored individual savings and investment schemes. What they should not do is throw more money at private-sector savings plans at the expense of Social Security. The absolute worst thing Congress could do is backdoor privatization of Social Security. That would happen if Congress expands private savings schemes and cuts Social Security’s modest but vital benefits. That would result in substantially less economic security for the nation’s working families. It must be avoided.
Nancy J. Altman is president of Social Security Works and chairs the Strengthen Social Security Coalition. James W. Russell is the author of “The Labor Guide to Retirement Plans.” He was a member of the State of Connecticut Retirement Security Board.
Date: |
Topics
Filter
-
US job market shows signs of cooling, with just 175,000 jobs added in April
The latest snapshot on US employment was a shocker: The economy added 175,000 jobs, far below expectations for 235,000 and a reversal of the trend for robust monthly gains.CNN - Top stories -
Talent war between family offices and Wall Street drives up salaries
Wealthy families are spending an average of $3 million to run their family offices, according to a J.P. Morgan Private report, and the biggest cost is staffing.CNBC - Business -
Jobs Data Revives Wall Street’s Hopes for a Rate Cut
A cooler-than-expected jobs report for April shifted the tone on Wall Street, rekindling investors’ expectations that the Federal Reserve may cut rates soon.The New York Times - Business -
U.S. stocks rally on ‘Goldilocks’ jobs report as Wall Street’s fear gauge slides
U.S. stocks have swung to an upbeat start in May, with Wall Street’s “fear gauge” easing to its lowest level since the end of March as investor anxieties tied to inflation appeared to subside.MarketWatch - Business -
Sweden prepares for Eurovision with heightened security
The celebration of pop is set to take place amid protests at Israel's involvement in the competition.BBC News - Top stories -
Immigrant workers are helping boost the U.S. labor market
The government predicts that the influx of immigrant workers will grow gross domestic product over the next decade by $7 trillion.CNBC - Business -
The top 5 countries where companies are scooping up American tech workers
Companies around the world are eager to hire U.S. tech talent.CNBC - Business -
Dairy worker with bird flu never developed respiratory symptoms, only pinkeye
Details of the bird flu infection in a Texas dairy worker were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.NBC News - Top stories -
‘America First’ conservatives aren’t putting American workers first
We know these senators aren’t on the side of the American worker, which begs the question — whose side are they on? The answer is obvious: people and corporations with money.The Hill - Politics -
Jessica Pratt, out of the L.A. underworld and into a (gentle) wall of sound
The folk singer made her name with stripped-down recordings but has now found a bigger approach on "Here in the Pitch." It wasn't an easy road to get there.Los Angeles Times - Entertainment
More from The Hill
-
California man charged with threatening Fulton County DA Fani Willis
A California man has been indicted by an Atlanta grand jury on charges of threatening Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D), according to a Friday press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia. Marc ...The Hill - Politics - California -
Fox anchor pushes back on Mace's claim of George Soros funding student protests
Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto pushed back on a claim by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) that progressive billionaire George Soros has funded groups involved in pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses. “There's a push right now on the part of some of ...The Hill - Politics -
University of Vermont cancels UN ambassador's address amid Gaza protests
The University of Vermont (UVM) has canceled United Nations Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield's commencement speech amid pro-Palestinian protests on campus as protests sweep colleges across the nation. “We are looking forward to the upcoming ...The Hill - Politics - United Nations -
George Conway: Hope Hicks 'absolutely' corroborates Cohen story on Trump
Conservative lawyer George Conway said former Trump aide Hope Hicks’ testimony at former President Trump's hush money trial “absolutely” corroborates his ex-lawyer Michael Cohen’s story about Trump in the case. “She put in Donald Trump's mouth, ...The Hill - Politics - Donald Trump -
Underwood to immediately replace Cuellar in prominent funding role after indictment
Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.) is set to become top Democrat on the House subcommittee that crafts Homeland Security Department (DHS) funding, replacing Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) shortly after he was indicted on bribery charges. Aides confirmed ...The Hill - Politics