Jan. 6 cases start being reopened after Supreme Court ruling
![Jan. 6 cases start being reopened after Supreme Court ruling](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/03/65eb93dde0a282.72772673-e1709953580594.jpeg?w=900)
Just hours after the Supreme Court narrowed an obstruction charge used to prosecute scores of Jan. 6 rioters, trial-level judges have started to reopen some cases tied to the 2021 Capitol attack.
The federal judge who oversaw the case against Guy Reffitt — the first rioter convicted by a jury — ordered Reffitt’s attorneys and the Justice Department (DOJ) to propose a schedule for “further proceedings” in light of the justices’ decision by July 5, signaling a resentencing is imminent.
Reffitt was convicted on five counts, including obstruction of an official proceeding. The charge, stemming from Section 1512(c)(2), makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct, impede or interfere with official inquiries and investigations by Congress. It carries a maximum of 20 years in prison and has been used to prosecute more than 350 rioters accused of interrupting Congress’s certification of the 2020 electoral vote.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Friday to rein in the obstruction charge after a different rioter, Joseph Fischer, challenged that provision as being improperly applied to those who participated in the Capitol attack.
The judge who handled Reffitt’s case — U.S. District Judge Dabney Langhorne Friedrich, a Trump appointee — reopened several other rioters’ cases Friday afternoon, directing them to adhere to similar instructions as Reffitt.
Among the hundreds of defendants convicted of obstruction of an official proceeding are several members of the extremist Proud Boys and Oath Keepers groups — including the leaders of each group, Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes, respectively, though they were each convicted of the more serious charge of seditious conspiracy.
Their cases remain dormant for now, though an attorney for Tarrio told The Hill earlier Friday that the ex-Proud Boys national chair's lawyers plan to “thoroughly review” Tarrio’s sentence and “any collateral consequences” of the high court’s decision.
Though most rioters charged with the obstruction count also faced other felony counts, 50 rioters were sentenced with the obstruction law as their only felony, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said during arguments before the Supreme Court in April.
Other rioters took plea deals involving the charge, like Tennessee native Ronald Sandlin, whom prosecutors said traveled to Washington in a rental car packed with two pistols, two magazines of ammunition, cans of bear mace and other gear. His case was reopened Friday.
The Supreme Court’s decision could also cause one of the most notorious rioters from the Capitol attack to face prosecution again, the DOJ signaled in recent court filings: Jacob Chansley, dubbed the "QAnon Shaman."
Chansley pleaded guilty to obstruction of an official proceeding and was sentenced to 41 months in prison without a trial. He was released early last year, but in recent court filings, prosecutors said the Supreme Court’s decision “may create a situation where evidence must be preserved and Defendant tried,” not expanding further on the matter.
Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement following the verdict Friday that he is “disappointed” by the decision, but the “vast majority” of rioters charged for their role in the attack “will not be affected by this decision.” The DOJ will take “appropriate steps” to comply with the high court’s ruling, he said.
“We will continue to use all available tools to hold accountable those criminally responsible for the January 6 attack on our democracy,” Garland said.
Date: |
Filter
-
CBS News - Top stories
Changes coming in Jan. 6 cases after Supreme Court ruling on obstruction charge
Judges are now scheduling changes in multiple cases involving Capitol rioters following the Supreme Court's ruling that narrowed the scope of the obstruction law used to prosecute some Jan. 6 defendants. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott ... -
NBC News - Top stories
Supreme Court's immunity ruling will delay Trump's Jan. 6 case until after the election
The Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision will further delay special counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 case against former President Donald Trump.Donald Trump -
The New York Times - Top stories
Supreme Court Says Prosecutors Overstepped With Jan. 6 Charge
The ruling that the Justice Department misused a 2002 law in charging a pro-Trump rioter who entered the Capitol could have an impact on hundreds of other cases, including one against Donald Trump. -
The Hill - Politics
Supreme Court rules in favor of Jan. 6 rioters in obstruction case
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that an obstruction law used to charge scores of Jan. 6 rioters and former President Trump was improperly applied, spelling trouble for the Justice Department’s far-reaching prosecution of the Capitol attack. The ... -
The Wall Street Journal - World
Supreme Court Rules Prosecutors Overreached in Jan. 6 Cases
The court limited the Justice Department’s ability to use an Enron-era obstruction of justice statute to prosecute some people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. -
CBS News - Top stories
How will the Supreme Court's Fischer ruling impact Jan. 6 cases?
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a man accused of playing a role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The justices said prosecutors overstepped when they charged Joseph Fischer with obstruction, and that they need to prove specific actions to ... -
NBC News - Politics
Supreme Court's Jan. 6 ruling expected to ripple through rioters' cases but not necessarily Trump's
The ruling triggered activity in other Capitol rioters' cases to revisit the obstruction charge, but it's unlikely to derail Trump's election interference case.Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
Ex-Trump official lauds Supreme Court ruling on Jan. 6 riot cases: 'Absolutely right'
Former Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker (R) said that the Supreme Court was “absolutely right” in blocking the Justice Department (DOJ) from charging Jan. 6 rioters with obstruction. Whitaker, who served as former President Trump’s Acting ...Donald Trump -
CBS News - Top stories
Supreme Court limits scope of obstruction charge used in Jan. 6 cases
The Supreme Court narrowed the Justice Department's use of a federal obstruction statute leveled against scores of people who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Psaki defends debate prep team: 'Biden was bad'
MSNBC anchor Jen Psaki, who once served as President Biden's press secretary, defended his campaign amid criticism of the president's debate performance last week, instead pinning the blame on the president. Psaki said it is “absurd” to blame ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Head of Trump PAC predicts 'cannibalistic chaos' if Dems replace Biden
The head of the primary super PAC supporting former President Trump said the potential replacement of President Biden as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee would be “impossible” to carry out and essentially spell defeat for the party in ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Doubts have grown over Biden's mental fitness: Poll
Voters' doubts about President Biden’s fitness to serve in the Oval Office have grown over the past few months, according to a new poll released Monday amid the fallout from his shaky debate performance last week. The latest Harvard CAPS-Harris ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Trump lead over Biden unchanged since debate: Poll
Former President Trump’s lead over President Biden in national polling is unchanged following the debate between the candidates last week, according to a new survey. The Harvard CAPS/Harris poll released Monday, which was conducted after the ...Joe Biden -
The Hill - Politics
Luttig: Trump, other presidents now 'above the law'
Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said former President Trump and other U.S. presidents can now be considered "above the law" after the Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from prosecution. “It can never again ...Donald Trump