Jack Smith's 'October Surprise' was not that surprising...and that is the problem
"The most stupendous and atrocious fraud." Those words from federal prosecutors could have been ripped from the filing this week of Special Counsel Jack Smith defending his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
Yet they were actually from a Justice Department filing 184 years ago, just days from the 1840 presidential election. Democratic President Martin Van Buren was struggling for reelection against Whig William Henry Harrison, and his Justice Department waited until just before voters went to the polls to allege that Whig Party officials had paid Pennsylvanians to travel to New York to vote for Whig candidates two years earlier.
It was considered by many to be the first "October Surprise," the last-minute pre-election scandal or major event intended to sway voters.
To avoid such allegations of political manipulation of cases, the Justice Department has long followed a policy against making potentially influential filings within 60 or 90 days of an election. One section of the Justice Department manual states “Federal prosecutors… may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election.”
Jack Smith, however, has long dismissed such considerations. For years, Smith has been unrelenting in his demands for a trial before the election. He has even demanded that Donald Trump be barred from standard appellate options in order to expedite his trial.
Smith never fully explained the necessity of holding a trial before the election beyond suggesting that voters should see the trial and the results — assaulting the very premise of the Justice Department's rule against such actions just before elections.
After the Supreme Court rendered parts of his indictment against Trump presumptively unconstitutional, Smith made clear that he was prepared to prosecute Trump up to the very day of his inauguration.
True to his reputation and record, Smith refused to drop the main allegations against Trump to avoid official decisions or acts that the court found to be protected in Trump v. United States. Instead, he stripped out some prior evidence linked to Trump's presidency, including witnesses serving in the White House. Yet the same underlying allegations remain. Smith just repeatedly uses references to Trump as acting as "a private citizen."
It is like a customer complaining that he did not order a Coke and the waiter pouring it into a Mountain Dew bottle and saying, "Done!"
Smith even refused to drop the obstruction of official proceedings, despite another recent Supreme Court decision (Fischer v. United States) rendering that charge presumptively invalid.
Smith is making his case not to Judge Tanya Chutkan, but to America's voters. Chutkan has consistently ruled with Smith to help him expedite the case. She permitted his hastened "rocket docket" despite declaring that she would not consider the election schedule as a factor in the pace of filings or even of the trial itself.
For critics, Judge Chutkan has proven far too motivated in the case. Indeed, many thought that she should have recused herself given her statement from a sentencing hearing of a Jan. 6 rioter in 2022. Chutkan said that the rioters “were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man — not to the Constitution.” She added then “[i]t’s a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” That "one person" was then brought to her courtroom for trial by Smith.
In their latest move, Chutkan and Smith used the Supreme Court decision to file a type of preemptive defense — an excuse to lay out the allegations against Trump in a 165-page filing filled with damaging accounts and testimonials against Trump, just weeks ahead of the election.
Even Chutkin herself acknowledged that Smith's request was “procedurally irregular," but she still allowed it. This was a premature exercise that would ordinarily occur months later, after defense filings. She could have scheduled such filings just a few weeks from now. She could have easily kept the filing under seal to avoid the appearance of political machinations. But the political effect appears to be the point. Chutkin again selected the most politically impactful option, at Smith's urging.
This was so "irregular" that ordinarily anti-Trump legal analysts, such as CNN's senior legal analyst Elie Honig, denounced Smith's filing as "an unprincipled, norm-breaking practice." He added that "Smith has essentially abandoned any pretense; he’ll bend any rule, switch up on any practice — so long as he gets to chip away at Trump’s electoral prospects."
Others, as expected, applauded the filing as not just well-directed but well-timed. Smith was making his closing election argument to voters because he knows that the 2024 election will be the largest jury verdict in history.
If voters reelect Trump, then neither Chutkin nor Smith will likely see a jury in the case. This is why they must convict Trump now in the public eye, or else admit to an effective acquittal by plebiscite.
Their timing could well backfire. The weaponization of the legal system is central to this election, including the role of the Justice Department in pushing the debunked Russia-collusion allegations from the 2016 race. For many, the contents of Smith's filing is not nearly as important as the time stamp over the case caption. Titled a "Motion for Immunity Determination," it seems more like a "Motion for an Election Determination."
Smith's raw political calculation should be troubling for anyone who values the rule of law. None of this excuses anything in these allegations against Trump. But the most disturbing part of Smith's October Surprise was that it was not in the least bit surprising.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Date: |
-
Politics - The Hill
Harris gets October Surprise
Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter {beacon} Business & Economy Business & Economy The Big Story Harris buoyed by strong jobs report, port strike end An expectation-smashing jobs ...19 hours ago - Kamala Harris -
Business - MarketWatch
September jobs report could give stock and bond markets an October surprise
Payroll figures reveal if the Fed is ahead of the curve or behind it.2 days ago -
Business - Financial Times
The surprising benefits of marital rage
How strong and difficult feelings might be used to strengthen intimacy rather than corrode it13 hours ago -
Top stories - NBC News
Falcons win in surprise overtime defeat against Buccaneers
Buccaneers take on the Falcons in AtlantaYesterday -
Science - The New York Times
Scientists Found a Surprising Way to Make Fungus Happy
The discovery that sound improves the growth rate of beneficial fungus suggests that dirges in the dirt may help restore forests.Yesterday -
Sports - The New York Times
Rising N.F.L. Prospects That Could Be Surprise First-Rounders
The Athletic’s draft expert breaks down three non-quarterback college stars who have generated a buzz among league scouts.16 hours ago - NFL -
Sports - ESPN
In surprise, Mets' Senga given G1 nod vs. Phillies
Kodai Senga, who threw 5 1/3 innings in the regular season due to multiple injuries, will start Game 1 for the Mets in Philly. "I'm ready for whatever. If they say 10 pitches, I'm all-in for 10 ...2 hours ago - MLB -
Politics - The Hill
Hillary Clinton is wrong — it's all about the 'November Surprise'
Harris, the shadowy puppet masters behind her and much of the media are working 24/7 to ensure that the American people never learn what she “stands for.”1 hour ago -
Top stories - CBS News
How Donald Trump reacted to Jack Smith's filing
Sources close to Donald Trump say he is angry over special counsel Jack Smith's filing that lays out apparent evidence against the former president in the election interference case. CBS News' ...Yesterday - Donald Trump
More from The Hill
-
Politics - The Hill
Glenn Youngkin and the art of the flip: A guide to winning in tough areas
When Youngkin won the Virginia gubernatorial election in 2021, he used a unique strategy to focus on independent swing voters in the suburbs rather than the devout MAGA base.35 minutes ago -
Politics - The Hill
Former CIA head signals full-scale war inevitable if Israel 'goes all out'
Former Secretary of Defense and CIA Director Leon Panetta said the war in the Middle East is at a crucial point now and future actions will signal whether there will be an imminent “full scale ...54 minutes ago - Israel -
Politics - The Hill
Dolly Parton, Walmart announce millions in donations to Helene victims
East Tennessee's own Dolly Parton is expected to offer her assistance to help with the flood recovery efforts in Newport.1 hour ago -
Politics - The Hill
Where do Trump, Harris stand on marijuana policy?
In a poll taken last year, roughly 70% of American adults said marijuana should be legal — but where do the presidential candidates stand?1 hour ago - Kamala Harris -
Politics - The Hill
Where the Harris-Trump race stands 1 month out from Election Day
Vice President Harris and former President Trump have one month to convince voters to side with them in what appears likely to be one of the tightest presidential races in American history. Harris ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump