It’s almost too late to protect our elections from AI — Congress must act now
The 2024 general election is nearly upon us, and artificial intelligence is already playing a significant role. This emerging technology is changing how we communicate with one another — as well as creating new opportunities to influence and manipulate voters.
Bad actors can use AI to create deceptive audio or visual content — sometimes called a “deepfake” — that convincingly portrays a false or distorted reality. AI can mislead voters about what a person has said or done, even showing them events that have never happened. We’ve already seen deepfakes being used to spread falsehoods about candidates, and it’s likely we’ll see more before the 2024 election is over.
For example, ahead of New Hampshire’s 2024 presidential primary, robocalls featuring an AI-generated message mimicking President Biden’s voice told would-be Democratic voters not to vote in the primary because doing so would preclude them from voting in the general election, which is patently untrue.
Likewise, on the eve of a hotly contested mayoral election in Chicago last year, an anonymous social media account posted a deepfake message falsely depicting a candidate saying, “back in my day, cops would kill 17 or 18 people and nobody would bat an eye.” The post went viral before it was taken down, and the targeted candidate lost the election by fewer than 26,500 votes, or 4.5 percent of the votes cast.
These examples may soon appear amateurish as this nascent technology continues to advance. As AI becomes more widespread, the potential for electoral mischief will only grow.
Politicians may not be the only ones falsely depicted or targeted: AI could be used to falsely portray an influential person, like Taylor Swift or Elon Musk, encouraging their massive audience to support a specific candidate or misrepresenting where or how to cast a ballot.
This threat doesn’t end on Election Day, either: AI-generated deepfakes could be used to falsely show election workers throwing away ballots or bringing in fake ballots to alter election results, in a bid to inflame people and even perpetrate post-election violence like we saw during the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
It is imperative that Congress establish guardrails around this essentially unregulated area now — not after a disastrous electoral event has taken place. Federal regulatory agencies have taken some useful, albeit small, steps in the right direction. But their limited efforts are woefully inadequate to meet the challenge at hand.
For instance, the Federal Election Commission, the agency primarily responsible for ensuring the integrity of federal elections, just issued an “interpretive rule” effectively confirming that a decades-old law prohibiting “fraudulent misrepresentation of campaign authority” — including falsely claiming to speak for or on behalf of a candidate in a way that is “damaging” to them — applies whether or not a bad actor uses AI.
While that guidance is helpful, it doesn’t come close to addressing the myriad election-related dangers that AI presents.
Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which regulates broadcasters like TV and radio stations, is in the midst of crafting a regulation to require broadcasters to provide disclaimers on any political ad that uses AI. Such disclaimers would make voters aware when an ad they’re seeing uses AI to distort reality, which is a great idea. But the FCC can only apply this rule to radio and TV ads — in an era where a huge chunk of political advertising appears online, on apps, or via streaming video, regulating radio and TV alone won’t cut it.
What’s needed are new federal laws that, at a minimum, accomplish two things: prohibit ads that fraudulently deceive and manipulate voters, and require disclaimers on political ads that use AI regardless of the medium used to distribute those ads.
First, Congress should ban the use of deepfakes in ads featuring candidates or election workers. There is no place in our democracy for outright lies and manipulation about our elections. While the First Amendment protects free expression, it does not protect fraudulent speech.
Second, Congress should require disclaimers on political ads appearing in any medium, which inform viewers when the ad’s content has been materially created, altered or disseminated with AI. Disclaimers on the face of a communication will put voters on notice that something they are seeing or hearing has been altered, giving them the opportunity to investigate the changes, or at least treat the message with the required degree of skepticism.
The good news is that Congress is currently considering several bills that would accomplish these goals: the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act, the AI Transparency in Elections Act, the Preparing Election Administrators for AI Act, the Fraudulent Artificial Intelligence Regulations (FAIR) Elections Act, and the AI Ads Act.
The less good news is that time is running extremely short for Congress to act before the 2024 election.
Over the next few weeks, Americans will continue to be inundated with political ads every time they turn on their TVs, browse the internet, or open their favorite social media apps. For decades, voters have had to parse such ads to cut through the political spin and decide who to vote for. Now, thanks to AI, they’ll have to decide whether what they’re seeing or hearing is even real.
That’s asking a lot to exercise the most basic right of democratic participation, and there’s a genuine risk that frustrated and distrustful Americans will simply tune out and turn away.
Congress shouldn’t allow that to happen. It should act now to prevent AI from undermining our democracy, in 2024 and well beyond.
Saurav Ghosh serves as director for Federal Campaign Finance Reform at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. Previously, he served in the Office of General Counsel at the Federal Election Commission, investigating alleged violations in dozens of campaign finance matters.
Date: |
Topics
-
MarketWatch - Business
‘We have no health insurance’: My wife died, leaving behind a lot of medical debt. Am I responsible for her debt?
“Can they take our house?”5 hours ago -
The Hill - Politics
Georgia Election Board rules ballots must be hand counted
The Georgia Election Board ruled Friday that ballots must be hand-counted by local precincts despite concerns from election officials and opposition from some state officials. The Georgia Election ...1 hour ago -
The Guardian - World
Children vaping and alcohol warning labels: takeaways from the World Cancer Congress
Event heard findings of research on advertising for tobacco products and estimates of economic cost of ovarian cancer. The World Cancer Congress 2024 , the biannual conference of the Union for ...2 hours ago -
Wired - Tech
Xavier Niel, a Driving Force of French AI, Is Now Shaping TikTok
The TikTok owner’s newest board member revels in challenging the establishment.7 hours ago - Tiktok -
The New York Times - Lifestyle
She Was Fired From ‘Summer House’ but Now Gets the Last Laugh
The former reality television star has found her footing in comedy, with a hit Netflix special and a podcast tour.20 hours ago -
Financial Times - World
Coffee producers fear being cut off from EU by new land protection law
Drinks company JDE Peets pleads for year’s delay on ban on supplies from deforested areas over lack of guidelines14 hours ago - European Union -
The Hill - Politics
Congress should block aid to Egypt
Sisi has consolidated power in the presidency and its security apparatus, gutting the state’s political parties and amending the constitution to enshrine his authority.3 hours ago
More from The Hill
-
The Hill - Politics
Putin's conceptual error: A language does not a nation make
Russian President Vladimir Putin's belief that Russians and Ukrainians are one people is based on a highly inaccurate reconstruction of Russian and Ukrainian history, and the shared language of the ...38 minutes ago -
The Hill - Politics
Red states ask court to reject Google privacy settlement
A group of Republican-led states have asked a U.S. appeals court to reject a $62 million consumer privacy settlement with Google, citing large amounts of money awards going to class members' ...43 minutes ago - Google -
The Hill - Politics
Nate Silver finds Harris with edge on Trump for first time since Aug. 28
Vice President Harris has taken the lead in pollster Nate Silver's election forecast and model for the first time since Aug. 28. Harris now leads in the polling aggregation with 48.9 percent to ...1 hour ago - Donald Trump -
The Hill - Politics
A lesson for CBS: Live fact-checking is incompatible with good debate moderation
ABC News moderators Lindsey Davis and David Muir fact-checked former President Donald Trump during a presidential debate, raising questions about the impartiality of media network debate events and ...1 hour ago -
The Hill - Politics
Jill Biden: 'We have to have a peaceful transfer of power' in January
First lady Jill Biden emphasized the importance of a “peaceful transfer of power” in January in an article from NBC News that published Friday. “I think we have to vote. As Americans, you know, ...1 hour ago